IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v250y2024ics0951832024003053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Holistic collision avoidance decision support system for watchkeeping deck officers

Author

Listed:
  • SzÅ‚apczyÅ„ski, RafaÅ‚
  • SzÅ‚apczyÅ„ska, Joanna
  • Gil, Mateusz
  • Å»yczkowski, Marcin
  • Montewka, Jakub

Abstract

The paper presents a 3-stage synthesis-based Decision Support System for watchkeeping deck officers. Its functional scope covers conflict detection, maneuver selection, and maneuver execution, all phases supplemented by collision alerts. First, a customized elliptic ship domain is used for checking if both OS and TS will have enough free space. A survey-based navigators’ declarative OS arena is then used to determine the time at which OOW would like to take evasive action. Next, a safety level is assigned to the current situation based on the predicted violations of the ship domain and the declarative arena. The safety levels are also attributed to potential evasive maneuvers (single actions combining course alteration and rudder deflection). For a selected maneuver, Collision Avoidance Dynamic Critical Area (CADCA) is displayed, which informs OOW about the time window when the maneuver remains feasible. All of the above contribute to a holistic system of multi-level safety assessment utilizing: empirical ship domain, survey-based declarative arena, and ship dynamics-based CADCA. These, in turn, take into account navigators’ knowledge and preferences, ship maneuverability, and the impact of environmental conditions. The system is presented in three real-life scenarios located in the southern part of the Baltic Sea around the Danish straits.

Suggested Citation

  • SzÅ‚apczyÅ„ski, RafaÅ‚ & SzÅ‚apczyÅ„ska, Joanna & Gil, Mateusz & Å»yczkowski, Marcin & Montewka, Jakub, 2024. "Holistic collision avoidance decision support system for watchkeeping deck officers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003053
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024003053
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.