IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v212y2021ics0951832021000697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive use of replicated Latin Hypercube Designs for computing Sobol’ sensitivity indices

Author

Listed:
  • Damblin, Guillaume
  • Ghione, Alberto

Abstract

As recently pointed out in the field of Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) of computer simulations, the use of replicated Latin Hypercube Designs (rLHDs) is a cost-saving alternative to regular Monte Carlo sampling to estimate first-order Sobol’ indices. Indeed, two rLHDs are sufficient to compute the whole set of those indices regardless of the number of input variables. This relies on a permutation trick which, however, only works within the class of estimators called Oracle 2. In the present paper, we show that rLHDs are still beneficial to another class of estimators, called Oracle 1, which often outperforms Oracle 2 for estimating small and moderate indices. Even though unlike Oracle 2 the computation cost of Oracle 1 depends on the input dimension, the permutation trick can be applied to construct an averaged (triple) Oracle 1 estimator whose great accuracy is presented on a numerical example.

Suggested Citation

  • Damblin, Guillaume & Ghione, Alberto, 2021. "Adaptive use of replicated Latin Hypercube Designs for computing Sobol’ sensitivity indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:212:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021000697
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021000697
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kucherenko, S. & Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. & Pantelides, C. & Shah, N., 2009. "Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1135-1148.
    2. Sobol’, I.M. & Tarantola, S. & Gatelli, D. & Kucherenko, S.S. & Mauntz, W., 2007. "Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 957-960.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ballester-Ripoll, Rafael & Leonelli, Manuele, 2022. "Computing Sobol indices in probabilistic graphical models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Xing Liu & Enrico Zio & Emanuele Borgonovo & Elmar Plischke, 2024. "A Systematic Approach of Global Sensitivity Analysis and Its Application to a Model for the Quantification of Resilience of Interconnected Critical Infrastructures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Li, Shen & Kim, Do Kyun & Benson, Simon, 2021. "A probabilistic approach to assess the computational uncertainty of ultimate strength of hull girders," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Neves Costa, João & Ambrósio, Jorge & Andrade, António R. & Frey, Daniel, 2023. "Safety assessment using computer experiments and surrogate modeling: Railway vehicle safety and track quality indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azzini, Ivano & Rosati, Rossana, 2021. "Sobol’ main effect index: an Innovative Algorithm (IA) using Dynamic Adaptive Variances," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Nikishova, Anna & Comi, Giovanni E. & Hoekstra, Alfons G., 2020. "Sensitivity analysis based dimension reduction of multiscale models," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 205-220.
    3. Xiaoyan Zhu & Way Kuo, 2014. "Importance measures in reliability and mathematical programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 241-267, January.
    4. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2018. "Global sensitivity analysis: a generalized, unbiased and optimal estimator of total-effect variance," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 361-386, March.
    5. Lamboni, M. & Iooss, B. & Popelin, A.-L. & Gamboa, F., 2013. "Derivative-based global sensitivity measures: General links with Sobol’ indices and numerical tests," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 45-54.
    6. Sudret, B. & Mai, C.V., 2015. "Computing derivative-based global sensitivity measures using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 241-250.
    7. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    8. Sobol' Ilya M. & Shukhman Boris V., 2007. "On Global Sensitivity Indices: Monte Carlo Estimates Affected by Random Errors," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 89-97, April.
    9. Medeiros-Sousa, Antônio Ralph & Lange, Martin & Mucci, Luis Filipe & Marrelli, Mauro Toledo & Grimm, Volker, 2024. "Modelling the transmission and spread of yellow fever in forest landscapes with different spatial configurations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
    10. Ge, Qiao & Menendez, Monica, 2017. "Extending Morris method for qualitative global sensitivity analysis of models with dependent inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 28-39.
    11. Hou, Tianfeng & Nuyens, Dirk & Roels, Staf & Janssen, Hans, 2019. "Quasi-Monte Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and error estimation in engineering applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Lamboni, Matieyendou, 2021. "Derivative-based integral equalities and inequality: A proxy-measure for sensitivity analysis," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 137-161.
    13. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    14. Liu, Yaning & Yousuff Hussaini, M. & Ökten, Giray, 2016. "Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 281-295.
    15. Lamboni, Matieyendou, 2022. "Weak derivative-based expansion of functions: ANOVA and some inequalities," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 691-718.
    16. Gatelli, D. & Kucherenko, S. & Ratto, M. & Tarantola, S., 2009. "Calculating first-order sensitivity measures: A benchmark of some recent methodologies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1212-1219.
    17. Lamboni, Matieyendou, 2020. "Derivative-based generalized sensitivity indices and Sobol’ indices," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 236-256.
    18. Sobol' I. M. & Myshetskaya E. E., 2008. "Monte Carlo estimators for small sensitivity indices," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 13(5-6), pages 455-465, January.
    19. Jiacheng Liu & Haiyun Liu & Cong Zhang & Jiyin Cao & Aibo Xu & Jiwei Hu, 2024. "Derivative-Variance Hybrid Global Sensitivity Measure with Optimal Sampling Method Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Sinan Xiao & Zhenzhou Lu & Pan Wang, 2018. "Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Distance Components Decomposition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2703-2721, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:212:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021000697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.