IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v205y2021ics0951832020307353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of logic regression to assess the importance of interactions between components in a network

Author

Listed:
  • Rocco, Claudio M.
  • Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis
  • Mun, Johnathan

Abstract

Logic regression (LR), not to be confused with logistic regression, is a well-known alternative tree-based method and powerful statistical learning technique that can be used to classify a binary response using Boolean combinations of binary predictors. In our case, given the binary states of the components of a network and its corresponding operating or failed status, LR can quantify the importance of the interactions of components according to their predictive capabilities (strength for classification). Meaning that, unlike traditional approaches in the reliability field, a completely different assumption is used. This paper shows the application of logic regression in six networks. Each example is characterized by a matrix representing the status of each component and a vector showing the corresponding network status. These data are analytically derived or using simulation procedures. The results show that LR could be considered as an additional assessment tool, where the most important effects (single or interactions) of components emerge naturally as a result of an optimization problem. As a byproduct, LR is also able to detect possible minimal cut/path sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocco, Claudio M. & Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis & Mun, Johnathan, 2021. "Application of logic regression to assess the importance of interactions between components in a network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:205:y:2021:i:c:s0951832020307353
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832020307353
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "The reliability importance of components and prime implicants in coherent and non-coherent systems including total-order interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 485-495, August.
    2. Yun Lu & Sridhar Hannenhalli & Tom Cappola & Mary Putt, 2014. "An evaluation of Monte-Carlo logic and logicFS motivated by a study of the regulation of gene expression in heart failure," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1956-1975, September.
    3. David A. Butler, 1979. "A complete importance ranking for components of binary coherent systems, with extensions to multi‐state systems," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 565-578, December.
    4. Nunkesser, Robin & Bernholt, Thorsten & Schwender, Holger & Ickstadt, Katja & Wegener, Ing, 2007. "Detecting high-order interactions of single nucleotide polymorphisms using genetic programming," Technical Reports 2007,24, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    5. Gao, Xueli & Cui, Lirong & Li, Jinlin, 2007. "Analysis for joint importance of components in a coherent system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 282-299, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dui, Hongyan & Wu, Shaomin & Zhao, Jiangbin, 2021. "Some extensions of the component maintenance priority," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Di Maio, Francesco & Baronchelli, Samuele & Zio, Enrico, 2014. "Hierarchical differential evolution for minimal cut sets identification: Application to nuclear safety systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 645-652.
    3. Wu, Shaomin & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2013. "A cost-based importance measure for system components: An extension of the Birnbaum importance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 189-195.
    4. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    5. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    6. Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Xie, Min & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Generalized moment-independent importance measures based on Minkowski distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 449-455.
    7. Borgonovo, E. & Smith, C.L., 2012. "Composite multilinearity, epistemic uncertainty and risk achievement worth," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 301-311.
    8. Fangyu Liu & Hongyan Dui & Ziyue Li, 2022. "Reliability analysis for electrical power systems based on importance measures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 317-328, April.
    9. Dui, Hongyan & Zhang, Chi & Tian, Tianzi & Wu, Shaomin, 2022. "Different costs-informed component preventive maintenance with system lifetime changes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2018. "Marginal and joint reliability importance based on survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 118-128.
    11. Nunkesser, Robin & Morell, Oliver, 2008. "Evolutionary algorithms for robust methods," Technical Reports 2008,29, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    12. Hsun‐Wen Chang & F.K. Hwang, 2002. "Rare‐event component importance for the consecutive‐k system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(2), pages 159-166, March.
    13. Liu, Mingli & Wang, Dan & Si, Shubin, 2023. "Mixed reliability importance-based solving algorithm design for the cost-constrained reliability optimization model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    14. Do Van, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2010. "From differential to difference importance measures for Markov reliability models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 513-521, August.
    15. Gao, Rong & Zhang, Shijie, 2024. "Reliability importance analysis of uncertain random k-out-of-n systems with multiple states," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Dui, Hongyan & Li, Shumin & Xing, Liudong & Liu, Hanlin, 2019. "System performance-based joint importance analysis guided maintenance for repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 162-175.
    17. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Sedlacek, Peter & Kvassay, Miroslav & Rabcan, Jan, 2021. "Logical differential calculus for calculation of Birnbaum importance of non-coherent system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    18. Dutuit, Yves & Rauzy, Antoine, 2015. "On the extension of Importance Measures to complex components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 161-168.
    19. Huang, Xianzhen & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2019. "A heuristic survival signature based approach for reliability-redundancy allocation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 511-517.
    20. Zhong Wang & Tian Liu & Zhenwu Lin & John Hegarty & Walter A Koltun & Rongling Wu, 2010. "A General Model for Multilocus Epistatic Interactions in Case-Control Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-9, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:205:y:2021:i:c:s0951832020307353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.