IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v222y2012i2p301-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Composite multilinearity, epistemic uncertainty and risk achievement worth

Author

Listed:
  • Borgonovo, E.
  • Smith, C.L.

Abstract

Risk achievement worth is one of the most widely utilized importance measures. RAW is defined as the ratio of the risk metric value attained when a component has failed over the base case value of the risk metric. Traditionally, both the numerator and denominator are point estimates. Relevant literature has shown that inclusion of epistemic uncertainty (i) induces notable variability in the point estimate ranking and (ii) causes the expected value of the risk metric to differ from its nominal value. We investigate the conditions under which the equality of the nominal and expected values of a reliability risk metric holds. We then study how the presence of epistemic uncertainty affects RAW and the associated ranking. We propose an extension of RAW (called ERAW) which allows one to obtain a ranking robust to epistemic uncertainty. We discuss the properties of ERAW and the conditions under which it coincides with RAW. We apply our findings to a probabilistic risk assessment model developed for the safety analysis of NASA lunar space missions.

Suggested Citation

  • Borgonovo, E. & Smith, C.L., 2012. "Composite multilinearity, epistemic uncertainty and risk achievement worth," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 301-311.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:222:y:2012:i:2:p:301-311
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221712003554
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Borgonovo & C. L. Smith, 2011. "A Study of Interactions in the Risk Assessment of Complex Engineering Systems: An Application to Space PSA," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1461-1476, December.
    2. Grabisch, Michel & Labreuche, Christophe & Vansnick, Jean-Claude, 2003. "On the extension of pseudo-Boolean functions for the aggregation of interacting criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 28-47, July.
    3. Smith, Curtis & Knudsen, James & Kvarfordt, Kellie & Wood, Ted, 2008. "Key attributes of the SAPHIRE risk and reliability analysis software for risk-informed probabilistic applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1151-1164.
    4. Borgonovo, E. & Gatti, S. & Peccati, L., 2010. "What drives value creation in investment projects? An application of sensitivity analysis to project finance transactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 227-236, August.
    5. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Mathonet, Pierre, 2011. "Weighted Banzhaf power and interaction indexes through weighted approximations of games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 352-358, June.
    6. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "The reliability importance of components and prime implicants in coherent and non-coherent systems including total-order interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 485-495, August.
    7. Hoepfer, V.M. & Saleh, J.H. & Marais, K.B., 2009. "On the value of redundancy subject to common-cause failures: Toward the resolution of an on-going debate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1904-1916.
    8. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Pierreval, Henri & Zhang, Jin, 2011. "Methodology for determining the acceptability of system designs in uncertain environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 176-183, March.
    9. Do Van, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2010. "From differential to difference importance measures for Markov reliability models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 513-521, August.
    10. Robert F. Bordley & Craig W. Kirkwood, 2004. "Multiattribute Preference Analysis with Performance Targets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 823-835, December.
    11. Reeves, Gary R. & Gonzalez, Juan J., 1989. "A comparison of two interactive procedures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 203-209, July.
    12. Dubois, Didier & Prade, Henri & Sabbadin, Regis, 2001. "Decision-theoretic foundations of qualitative possibility theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 459-478, February.
    13. Gao, Xueli & Cui, Lirong & Li, Jinlin, 2007. "Analysis for joint importance of components in a coherent system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 282-299, October.
    14. Saaty, Thomas L., 1994. "Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 426-447, May.
    15. Alonso-Meijide, J.M. & Casas-Mendez, B. & Holler, M.J. & Lorenzo-Freire, S., 2008. "Computing power indices: Multilinear extensions and new characterizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 540-554, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatsuya Sakurahara & Seyed Reihani & Ernie Kee & Zahra Mohaghegh, 2020. "Global importance measure methodology for integrated probabilistic risk assessment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 377-396, April.
    2. Emanuele Borgonovo & Alessandra Cillo & Curtis L. Smith, 2018. "On the Relationship between Safety and Decision Significance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1541-1558, August.
    3. Martorell, S. & Martón, I. & Villamizar, M. & Sánchez, A.I. & Carlos, S., 2014. "Evaluation of risk impact of changes to Completion Times addressing model and parameter uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 190-201.
    4. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "The reliability importance of components and prime implicants in coherent and non-coherent systems including total-order interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 485-495, August.
    2. E. Borgonovo & C. L. Smith, 2011. "A Study of Interactions in the Risk Assessment of Complex Engineering Systems: An Application to Space PSA," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1461-1476, December.
    3. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Aliee, Hananeh & Glaß, Michael & Teich, Jürgen, 2016. "A new time-independent reliability importance measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 427-442.
    4. Wu, Shaomin & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2013. "A cost-based importance measure for system components: An extension of the Birnbaum importance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 189-195.
    5. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    6. Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Xie, Min & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Generalized moment-independent importance measures based on Minkowski distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 449-455.
    7. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    8. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2016. "Fuzzy Measures and Integrals in MCDA," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 553-603, Springer.
    9. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2010. "A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 247-286, March.
    10. Dui, Hongyan & Wu, Shaomin & Zhao, Jiangbin, 2021. "Some extensions of the component maintenance priority," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Di Maio, Francesco & Baronchelli, Samuele & Zio, Enrico, 2014. "Hierarchical differential evolution for minimal cut sets identification: Application to nuclear safety systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 645-652.
    12. Toppila, Antti & Salo, Ahti, 2017. "Selection of risk reduction portfolios under interval-valued probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 69-78.
    13. Rocco, Claudio M. & Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis & Mun, Johnathan, 2021. "Application of logic regression to assess the importance of interactions between components in a network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    14. Grabisch, Michel, 2006. "Representation of preferences over a finite scale by a mean operator," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 131-151, September.
    15. Zaitseva, Elena & Levashenko, Vitaly & Kostolny, Jozef, 2015. "Importance analysis based on logical differential calculus and Binary Decision Diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-144.
    16. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Boushaba, Mahmoud & Coit, David W. & Benyahia, Azzeddine, 2017. "Reliability and importance measures for m-consecutive-k, l-out-of-n system with non-homogeneous Markov-dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1-9.
    17. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    18. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    19. Levary, Reuven R. & Wan, Ke, 1999. "An analytic hierarchy process based simulation model for entry mode decision regarding foreign direct investment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 661-677, December.
    20. Tianyang Wang & James S. Dyer & Warren J. Hahn, 2017. "Sensitivity analysis of decision making under dependent uncertainties using copulas," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 117-139, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:222:y:2012:i:2:p:301-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.