IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v193y2020ics0951832018312754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for probabilistic model-based engineering and data synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Ray, Douglas
  • Ramirez-Marquez, Jose

Abstract

Modern computing resources provide scientists, engineers, and system design teams the ability to study phenomena, such as system behavior, in a virtual setting. Computational modeling and simulation (M&S) enables engineers to avoid many of the challenges encountered in traditional design engineering, including the design, manufacture, and testing of expensive prototypes prior to having an optimized design. However, the use of M&S carries its own challenges, such as the computational time and resources required to execute effective studies, and uncertainties arising from simplifying assumptions inherent to computer models, which are intended to be an approximate representation of reality. In recent year advances have been made in a number of areas related to the efficient and reliable use of M&S for system evaluations, including design & analysis of computer experiments, uncertainty quantification, probabilistic analysis, response optimization, and data synthesis techniques. In this review paper, a general framework for systematically executing efficient M&S studies at the component-level, product-level, system-level, and system-of-systems-level is described. A case study is used to demonstrate how statistical and probabilistic techniques can be integrated with M&S to address those challenges inherent to model-based engineering, and how this aligns with the proposed workflow. The example is a gun-launch dynamics model of an artillery projectile developed by US Army engineers, and illustrates the application of this workflow in the study of subsystem system reliability, performance, and end-to-end system-level characterization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ray, Douglas & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose, 2020. "A framework for probabilistic model-based engineering and data synthesis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:193:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018312754
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018312754
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaizer, Joshua S. & Heller, A. Kevin & Oberkampf, William L., 2015. "Scientific computer simulation review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 210-218.
    2. Cordes, J.A. & Thomas, J. & Wong, R.S. & Carlucci, D., 2009. "Reliability estimates for flawed mortar projectile bodies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1887-1893.
    3. Zhu, Shun-Peng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Peng, Weiwen & Wang, Hai-Kun & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2016. "Probabilistic Physics of Failure-based framework for fatigue life prediction of aircraft gas turbine discs under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Rebba, Ramesh & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Huang, Shuping, 2006. "Validation and error estimation of computational models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1390-1397.
    5. Sankararaman, Shankar & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2015. "Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 194-209.
    6. V. Roshan Joseph & Evren Gul & Shan Ba, 2015. "Maximum projection designs for computer experiments," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(2), pages 371-380.
    7. Jack P.C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-18087-8, December.
    8. Mullins, Joshua & Ling, You & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Sun, Lin & Strachan, Alejandro, 2016. "Separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic model validation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 49-59.
    9. Peter Z. G. Qian, 2012. "Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 393-399, March.
    10. Marc C. Kennedy & Anthony O'Hagan, 2001. "Bayesian calibration of computer models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 425-464.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Yanwen & Kohtz, Sara & Boakye, Jessica & Gardoni, Paolo & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Neves Costa, João & Ambrósio, Jorge & Andrade, António R. & Frey, Daniel, 2023. "Safety assessment using computer experiments and surrogate modeling: Railway vehicle safety and track quality indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maupin, Kathryn A. & Swiler, Laura P., 2020. "Model discrepancy calibration across experimental settings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Vanslette, Kevin & Tohme, Tony & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2020. "A general model validation and testing tool," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Wang, Chong & Matthies, Hermann G., 2019. "Novel model calibration method via non-probabilistic interval characterization and Bayesian theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 84-92.
    4. Bjerga, Torbjørn & Aven, Terje & Zio, Enrico, 2014. "An illustration of the use of an approach for treating model uncertainties in risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 46-53.
    5. Jung, Yongsu & Lee, Ikjin, 2021. "Optimal design of experiments for optimization-based model calibration using Fisher information matrix," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Sankararaman, Shankar & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2015. "Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 194-209.
    7. Perrin, G., 2020. "Adaptive calibration of a computer code with time-series output," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Ao, Dan & Hu, Zhen & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2017. "Design of validation experiments for life prediction models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 22-33.
    9. Bozağaç, Doruk & Batmaz, İnci & Oğuztüzün, Halit, 2016. "Dynamic simulation metamodeling using MARS: A case of radar simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 69-86.
    10. Guillaume Perrin & Christian Soize, 2020. "Adaptive method for indirect identification of the statistical properties of random fields in a Bayesian framework," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 111-133, March.
    11. Tohme, Tony & Vanslette, Kevin & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2020. "A generalized Bayesian approach to model calibration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    12. Yang You & Guang Jin & Zhengqiang Pan & Rui Guo, 2021. "MP-CE Method for Space-Filling Design in Constrained Space with Multiple Types of Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Mullins, Joshua & Ling, You & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Sun, Lin & Strachan, Alejandro, 2016. "Separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic model validation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 49-59.
    14. Jung, Yongsu & Jo, Hwisang & Choo, Jeonghwan & Lee, Ikjin, 2022. "Statistical model calibration and design optimization under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Matthias Katzfuss & Joseph Guinness & Wenlong Gong & Daniel Zilber, 2020. "Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 383-414, September.
    16. Hao Wu & Michael Browne, 2015. "Random Model Discrepancy: Interpretations and Technicalities (A Rejoinder)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 619-624, September.
    17. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    18. Leurent, Martin & Jasserand, Frédéric & Locatelli, Giorgio & Palm, Jenny & Rämä, Miika & Trianni, Andrea, 2017. "Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe: Lessons learnt from Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-150.
    19. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    20. Xiaoyu Xiong & Benjamin D. Youngman & Theodoros Economou, 2021. "Data fusion with Gaussian processes for estimation of environmental hazard events," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:193:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018312754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.