IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v234y2020i1p88-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An extended geometric process and its application in replacement policy

Author

Listed:
  • Wenke Gao

Abstract

In this article, we develop an extended geometric process model with a recovery factor and propose a two-dimensional evaluation function for each maintenance effect. The developed model can describe the mean inter-failure time which can be improved by the first or several former repairs in some repairable systems. We also propose parameter estimation methods for the developed geometric process model and use some real failure datum to prove the model’s application. Focused on the developed geometric process model, two novel replacement policies and their optimizations are also presented in detail. Then, two real case studies are discussed to illustrate the modelling and optimizing process. Modelling results show that each recovery factor is related to the effect of each repair, and the developed geometric process model has a good-fitting property for some real cases. Optimization results display that the optimal ( N, m ) replacement policy is applicable for some small-sized manufacturing systems, whereas the proposed ( N ) replacement policy is suitable for some expensive systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenke Gao, 2020. "An extended geometric process and its application in replacement policy," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(1), pages 88-103, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:1:p:88-103
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X19868891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X19868891
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X19868891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2017. "Two new stochastic models of the failure process of a series system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 763-772.
    2. Wu, Shaomin & Clements-Croome, Derek, 2005. "Preventive maintenance models with random maintenance quality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 99-105.
    3. Chaoqun Duan & Chao Deng & Abolfazl Gharaei & Jun Wu & Bingran Wang, 2018. "Selective maintenance scheduling under stochastic maintenance quality with multiple maintenance actions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(23), pages 7160-7178, December.
    4. Zhang, Yuan Lin & Wang, Guan Jun, 2009. "A geometric process repair model for a repairable cold standby system with priority in use and repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1782-1787.
    5. Shaomin Wu, 2011. "Preventive Maintenance Models: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Lotfi Tadj & M.-Salah Ouali & Soumaya Yacout & Daoud Ait-Kadi (ed.), Replacement Models with Minimal Repair, pages 129-140, Springer.
    6. Nakagawa, T. & Mizutani, S., 2009. "A summary of maintenance policies for a finite interval," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 89-96.
    7. Toledo, Maria Luíza Guerra de & Freitas, Marta A. & Colosimo, Enrico A. & Gilardoni, Gustavo L., 2015. "ARA and ARI imperfect repair models: Estimation, goodness-of-fit and reliability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 107-115.
    8. G.Q. Cheng & L. Li, 2012. "A geometric process repair model with inspections and its optimisation," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1650-1655.
    9. Nafisah, Ibrahim & Shrahili, Mansour & Alotaibi, Naif & Scarf, Phil, 2019. "Virtual series-system models of imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 604-613.
    10. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2015. "Decline and repair, and covariate effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 219-226.
    11. Shaomin Wu, 2018. "Doubly geometric processes and applications," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 66-77, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rasay, Hasan & Taghipour, Sharareh & Sharifi, Mani, 2022. "An integrated Maintenance and Statistical Process Control Model for a Deteriorating Production Process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnold, Richard & Chukova, Stefanka & Hayakawa, Yu & Marshall, Sarah, 2020. "Geometric-Like Processes: An Overview and Some Reliability Applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Zhou, Yu & Kou, Gang & Xiao, Hui & Peng, Yi & Alsaadi, Fawaz E., 2020. "Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance model with failure intensity reduction with an application to urban buses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Junyuan Wang & Jimin Ye & Qianru Ma & Pengfei Xie, 2022. "An extended geometric process repairable model with its repairman having vacation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 401-415, April.
    4. Syamsundar, A. & Naikan, V.N.A. & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Extended Arithmetic Reduction of Age Models for the Failure Process of a Repairable System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    6. Beutner, Eric, 2023. "A review of effective age models and associated non- and semiparametric methods," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 105-119.
    7. Yan, Tao & Lei, Yaguo & Wang, Biao & Han, Tianyu & Si, Xiaosheng & Li, Naipeng, 2020. "Joint maintenance and spare parts inventory optimization for multi-unit systems considering imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    8. Jiang, R., 2020. "A novel two-fold sectional approximation of renewal function and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Miaomiao Yu & Yinghui Tang, 2024. "Analyze periodic inspection and replacement policy of a shock and wear model with phase-type inter-shock arrival times using roots method," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(2), pages 233-246, April.
    10. Junyuan Wang & Jimin Ye, 2022. "A new repair model and its optimization for cold standby system," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 105-122, March.
    11. Nafisah, Ibrahim & Shrahili, Mansour & Alotaibi, Naif & Scarf, Phil, 2019. "Virtual series-system models of imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 604-613.
    12. Wu, Shaomin, 2019. "A failure process model with the exponential smoothing of intensity functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 502-513.
    13. Luo, Ming & Wu, Shaomin, 2019. "A comprehensive analysis of warranty claims and optimal policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 144-159.
    14. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    15. Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Sheu, Shey-Huei & Zhang, Zhe George, 2017. "A trivariate optimal replacement policy for a deteriorating system based on cumulative damage and inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 74-88.
    16. Moriguchi, Kai & Ueki, Tatsuhito & Saito, Masashi, 2020. "Establishing optimal forest harvesting regulation with continuous approximation," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    17. Dilaver, Halit Metehan & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2023. "Integrated planning of asset-use and dry-docking for a fleet of maritime assets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Clavareau, Julien & Labeau, Pierre-Etienne, 2009. "A Petri net-based modelling of replacement strategies under technological obsolescence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 357-369.
    19. M D Pandey & T Cheng & J A M van der Weide, 2011. "Finite-time maintenance cost analysis of engineering systems affected by stochastic degradation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 241-250, June.
    20. Yevkin, Alexander & Krivtsov, Vasiliy, 2020. "A generalized model for recurrent failures prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:1:p:88-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.