IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v183y2019icp400-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust prediction of dense gas flows under uncertain thermodynamic models

Author

Listed:
  • Merle, X.
  • Cinnella, P.

Abstract

A Bayesian approach is developed to quantify uncertainties associated with the thermodynamic models used for the simulation of dense gas flows, i.e. flows of gases characterized by complex molecules of moderate to high molecular weight, in thermodynamic conditions of the general order of magnitude of the liquid/vapor critical point. The thermodynamic behaviour of dense gases can be modelled through equations of state with various mathematical structures, all involving a set of material-dependent coefficients. For several organic fluids of industrial interest abundant and high-quality thermodynamic data required to specify such coefficients are hardly available, leading to undetermined levels of uncertainty of the equation output. Additionally, the best choice for the kind of equation of state (mathematical form) to be used is not always easy to determine and it is often based on expert opinion. In other terms, equations of state introduce both parametric and model-form uncertainties, which need to be quantified to make reliable predictions of the flow field. In this paper we propose a statistical inference methodology for estimating both kinds of uncertainties simultaneously. Our approach consists of a calibration step and a prediction step. The former allows to infer on the parameters to be input to the equation of state, based on the observation of aerodynamic quantities like pressure measurements at some locations in the dense gas flow. The subsequent prediction step allows to predict unobserved flow configurations based on the inferred posterior distributions of the coefficients. Model-form uncertainties are incorporated in the prediction step by using a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) approach. This consists in constructing an average of the predictions of various competing models weighted by the posterior model probabilities. Bayesian averaging also provides a useful tool for making robust predictions from a set of alternative calibration scenarios (Bayesian model-scenario averaging or BMSA). The proposed methodology is assessed for a class of dense gas flows, namely transonic flows around an isolated airfoil, at various free-stream thermodynamic conditions in the dense-gas region.

Suggested Citation

  • Merle, X. & Cinnella, P., 2019. "Robust prediction of dense gas flows under uncertain thermodynamic models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 400-421.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:400-421
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017310104
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheung, Sai Hung & Oliver, Todd A. & Prudencio, Ernesto E. & Prudhomme, Serge & Moser, Robert D., 2011. "Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1137-1149.
    2. Marc C. Kennedy & Anthony O'Hagan, 2001. "Bayesian calibration of computer models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 425-464.
    3. Merle, X. & Cinnella, P., 2015. "Bayesian quantification of thermodynamic uncertainties in dense gas flows," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 305-323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zou, Aihong & Chassaing, Jean-Camille & Persky, Rodney & Gu, YuanTong & Sauret, Emilie, 2019. "Uncertainty Quantification in high-density fluid radial-inflow turbines for renewable low-grade temperature cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 313-330.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jincheng & Zhao, Xiaowei, 2020. "Quantification of parameter uncertainty in wind farm wake modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Kim, Wongon & Yoon, Heonjun & Lee, Guesuk & Kim, Taejin & Youn, Byeng D., 2020. "A new calibration metric that considers statistical correlation: Marginal Probability and Correlation Residuals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Merle, X. & Cinnella, P., 2015. "Bayesian quantification of thermodynamic uncertainties in dense gas flows," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 305-323.
    4. Vanslette, Kevin & Tohme, Tony & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2020. "A general model validation and testing tool," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Matthias Katzfuss & Joseph Guinness & Wenlong Gong & Daniel Zilber, 2020. "Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 383-414, September.
    6. Jakub Bijak & Jason D. Hilton & Eric Silverman & Viet Dung Cao, 2013. "Reforging the Wedding Ring," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(27), pages 729-766.
    7. Hao Wu & Michael Browne, 2015. "Random Model Discrepancy: Interpretations and Technicalities (A Rejoinder)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 619-624, September.
    8. Villez, Kris & Del Giudice, Dario & Neumann, Marc B. & Rieckermann, Jörg, 2020. "Accounting for erroneous model structures in biokinetic process models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    9. Xiaoyu Xiong & Benjamin D. Youngman & Theodoros Economou, 2021. "Data fusion with Gaussian processes for estimation of environmental hazard events," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), May.
    10. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.
    11. David Breitenmoser & Francesco Cerutti & Gernot Butterweck & Malgorzata Magdalena Kasprzak & Sabine Mayer, 2023. "Emulator-based Bayesian inference on non-proportional scintillation models by compton-edge probing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Drignei, Dorin, 2011. "A general statistical model for computer experiments with time series output," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 460-467.
    13. Yuan, Jun & Nian, Victor & Su, Bin & Meng, Qun, 2017. "A simultaneous calibration and parameter ranking method for building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 657-666.
    14. Barde, Sylvain, 2024. "Bayesian estimation of large-scale simulation models with Gaussian process regression surrogates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Gross, Eitan, 2015. "Effect of environmental stress on regulation of gene expression in the yeast," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 224-235.
    16. Hwang, Youngdeok & Kim, Hang J. & Chang, Won & Yeo, Kyongmin & Kim, Yongku, 2019. "Bayesian pollution source identification via an inverse physics model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 76-92.
    17. Choi, Wonjun & Menberg, Kathrin & Kikumoto, Hideki & Heo, Yeonsook & Choudhary, Ruchi & Ooka, Ryozo, 2018. "Bayesian inference of structural error in inverse models of thermal response tests," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1473-1485.
    18. Yuan, Jun & Ng, Szu Hui, 2013. "A sequential approach for stochastic computer model calibration and prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 273-286.
    19. Edward Boone & Jan Hannig & Ryad Ghanam & Sujit Ghosh & Fabrizio Ruggeri & Serge Prudhomme, 2022. "Model Validation of a Single Degree-of-Freedom Oscillator: A Case Study," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Overstall, Antony M. & Woods, David C. & Martin, Kieran J., 2019. "Bayesian prediction for physical models with application to the optimization of the synthesis of pharmaceutical products using chemical kinetics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 126-142.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:400-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.