IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v178y2018icp269-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved inverse Gaussian process and bootstrap: Degradation and reliability metrics

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Jingbo
  • Wang, Changxi
  • Cabrera, Javier
  • Elsayed, Elsayed A.

Abstract

The inverse Gaussian (IG) process is commonly used in modeling monotonically increasing degradation processes. Traditional degradation modeling considers the process parameters as functions of time and environmental conditions. However, in many practical situations, the degradation increment in the next time interval may depend on degradation state at the current time interval. Therefore, in this paper, we propose an improved inverse Gaussian (IIG) process which considers the dependency between degradation increments and prior degradation states. Reliability metrics of the IIG process are estimated and validated using crack length growth data as well as simulated degradation data. Results show that the proposed model provides more accurate reliability metrics than the IG process model. Bootstrap of degradation increments or detrended degradation increments is introduced as a supplementary method to estimate the remaining life probability interval.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Jingbo & Wang, Changxi & Cabrera, Javier & Elsayed, Elsayed A., 2018. "Improved inverse Gaussian process and bootstrap: Degradation and reliability metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 269-277.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:178:y:2018:i:c:p:269-277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.06.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017314102
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2018.06.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molini, A. & Talkner, P. & Katul, G.G. & Porporato, A., 2011. "First passage time statistics of Brownian motion with purely time dependent drift and diffusion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(11), pages 1841-1852.
    2. Wang, Xiaolin & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy & Guo, Bo, 2014. "Residual life estimation based on a generalized Wiener degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-23.
    3. Haitao Liao & Elsayed A. Elsayed, 2006. "Reliability inference for field conditions from accelerated degradation testing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(6), pages 576-587, September.
    4. Kallen, M.J. & van Noortwijk, J.M., 2005. "Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 177-185.
    5. Peng, Weiwen & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Zuo, Ming J., 2014. "Inverse Gaussian process models for degradation analysis: A Bayesian perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 175-189.
    6. Wang, Xiao, 2010. "Wiener processes with random effects for degradation data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 340-351, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Changxi & Elsayed, Elsayed A., 2020. "Stochastic modeling of corrosion growth," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Salem, Marwa Belhaj & Fouladirad, Mitra & Deloux, Estelle, 2022. "Variance Gamma process as degradation model for prognosis and imperfect maintenance of centrifugal pumps," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Xu, Yanwen & Kohtz, Sara & Boakye, Jessica & Gardoni, Paolo & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Hao, Songhua & Yang, Jun & Berenguer, Christophe, 2019. "Degradation analysis based on an extended inverse Gaussian process model with skew-normal random effects and measurement errors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 261-270.
    6. Mikhail, Mina & Ouali, Mohamed-Salah & Yacout, Soumaya, 2024. "A data-driven methodology with a nonparametric reliability method for optimal condition-based maintenance strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    7. Li, Zan & Wang, Fengming & Wang, Chengjie & Hu, Qingpei & Yu, Dan, 2021. "Reliability modeling and evaluation of lifetime delayed degradation process with nondestructive testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    2. Yan, Bingxin & Ma, Xiaobing & Yang, Li & Wang, Han & Wu, Tianyi, 2020. "A novel degradation-rate-volatility related effect Wiener process model with its extension to accelerated ageing data analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Le Liu & Xiao-Yang Li & Enrico Zio & Rui Kang & Tong-Min Jiang, 2017. "Model Uncertainty in Accelerated Degradation Testing Analysis," Post-Print hal-01652218, HAL.
    4. Zhang, Fode & Ng, Hon Keung Tony & Shi, Yimin, 2020. "Mis-specification analysis of Wiener degradation models by using f-divergence with outliers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Hao, Songhua & Yang, Jun & Berenguer, Christophe, 2019. "Degradation analysis based on an extended inverse Gaussian process model with skew-normal random effects and measurement errors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 261-270.
    6. Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Chen, Nan & Shen, Yan, 2015. "A new class of Wiener process models for degradation analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 58-67.
    7. Peng, Weiwen & Li, Yan-Feng & Mi, Jinhua & Yu, Le & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability of complex systems under dynamic conditions: A Bayesian multivariate degradation perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 75-87.
    8. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    9. Tianyu Liu & Zhengqiang Pan & Quan Sun & Jing Feng & Yanzhen Tang, 2017. "Residual useful life estimation for products with two performance characteristics based on a bivariate Wiener process," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(1), pages 69-80, February.
    10. Xudan Chen & Guoxun Ji & Xinli Sun & Zhen Li, 2019. "Inverse Gaussian–based model with measurement errors for degradation analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1086-1098, December.
    11. Liu, Di & Wang, Shaoping & Cui, Xiaoyu, 2022. "An artificial neural network supported Wiener process based reliability estimation method considering individual difference and measurement error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    12. Zhou, Shirong & Tang, Yincai & Xu, Ancha, 2021. "A generalized Wiener process with dependent degradation rate and volatility and time-varying mean-to-variance ratio," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    13. Huang, Jianlin & Golubović, Dušan S & Koh, Sau & Yang, Daoguo & Li, Xiupeng & Fan, Xuejun & Zhang, G.Q., 2016. "Lumen degradation modeling of white-light LEDs in step stress accelerated degradation test," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 152-159.
    14. Chen, Nan & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Xiang, Yisha & Zhang, Linmiao, 2015. "Condition-based maintenance using the inverse Gaussian degradation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 190-199.
    15. Wang, Han & Zhao, Yu & Ma, Xiaobing & Wang, Hongyu, 2017. "Optimal design of constant-stress accelerated degradation tests using the M-optimality criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 45-54.
    16. Zhai, Qingqing & Chen, Piao & Hong, Lanqing & Shen, Lijuan, 2018. "A random-effects Wiener degradation model based on accelerated failure time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 94-103.
    17. Wang, Changxi & Elsayed, Elsayed A., 2020. "Stochastic modeling of corrosion growth," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Wang, Huan & Wang, Guan-jun & Duan, Feng-jun, 2016. "Planning of step-stress accelerated degradation test based on the inverse Gaussian process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 97-105.
    19. Bae, Suk Joo & Yuan, Tao & Ning, Shuluo & Kuo, Way, 2015. "A Bayesian approach to modeling two-phase degradation using change-point regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 66-74.
    20. Pang, Zhenan & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Du, Dangbo & Pei, Hong, 2021. "A Bayesian Inference for Remaining Useful Life Estimation by Fusing Accelerated Degradation Data and Condition Monitoring Data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:178:y:2018:i:c:p:269-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.