IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v178y2018icp12-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entering data correctly: An empirical evaluation of the theory of planned behaviour in the context of manual data acquisition

Author

Listed:
  • Haegemans, Tom
  • Snoeck, Monique
  • Lemahieu, Wilfried

Abstract

This study investigates to what extent psychosocial factors, as identified by the theory of planned behaviour, determine the intention of the data producers to enter data correctly and to what extent their intention explains the actual errors in the entered data. The research goal is achieved by means of an observational study in a major Belgian financial institution. The results show that the degree of intention of the data producers to enter data correctly explains a certain share of the actual errors in the studied data, but that a larger share could be explained by statistical control variables related to actual behavioural control. In addition, the results indicate that the surveyed data producers’ intention towards entering high quality data is mainly determined by two factors: their instrumental and experiential attitude. This paper adds to the literature by (1) empirically evaluating the theory of planned behaviour in a context of manual data entry using not only self-reported measures but also a measure of actual behaviour, and (2) by demonstrating the importance of actual behavioural control.

Suggested Citation

  • Haegemans, Tom & Snoeck, Monique & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2018. "Entering data correctly: An empirical evaluation of the theory of planned behaviour in the context of manual data acquisition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 12-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:178:y:2018:i:c:p:12-30
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017312978
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molina, Roger & Unsworth, Kerrie & Hodkiewicz, Melinda & Adriasola, Elisa, 2013. "Are managerial pressure, technological control and intrinsic motivation effective in improving data quality?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 26-34.
    2. Nicole DeHoratius & Ananth Raman, 2008. "Inventory Record Inaccuracy: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 627-641, April.
    3. Williams, Brian & Entwistle, Vikki & Haddow, Gill & Wells, Mary, 2008. "Promoting research participation: Why not advertise altruism?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 1451-1456, April.
    4. Kieran Mathieson, 1991. "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 173-191, September.
    5. J. B. Copas, 1989. "Unweighted Sum of Squares Test for Proportions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 38(1), pages 71-80, March.
    6. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    7. Unsworth, Kerrie & Adriasola, Elisa & Johnston-Billings, Amber & Dmitrieva, Alina & Hodkiewicz, Melinda, 2011. "Goal hierarchy: Improving asset data quality by improving motivation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1474-1481.
    8. Aksel Paulsen & Søren Overgaard & Jens Martin Lauritsen, 2012. "Quality of Data Entry Using Single Entry, Double Entry and Automated Forms Processing–An Example Based on a Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-6, April.
    9. Julian Lin & Hock Chuan Chan & Kwok Kee Wei, 2006. "Understanding competing application usage with the theory of planned behavior," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(10), pages 1338-1349, August.
    10. Fisher, Robert J, 1993. "Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 303-315, September.
    11. Rajdeep Grewal & Joseph A. Cote & Hans Baumgartner, 2004. "Multicollinearity and Measurement Error in Structural Equation Models: Implications for Theory Testing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 519-529, June.
    12. Kenneth A. Bollen & Robert A. Stine, 1992. "Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 205-229, November.
    13. Ian Atkinson, 2012. "Accuracy of data transfer: double data entry and estimating levels of error," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2730-2735, October.
    14. Murphy, Glen D., 2009. "Improving the quality of manually acquired data: Applying the theory of planned behaviour to data quality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1881-1886.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong‐Mi Kim, 2010. "The adoption of university library Web site resources: A multigroup analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 978-993, May.
    2. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    3. Femke Hilverda & Margôt Kuttschreuter, 2018. "Online Information Sharing About Risks: The Case of Organic Food," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1904-1920, September.
    4. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Maruping, Likoebe M. & Brown, Susan A., 2006. "Role of time in self-prediction of behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 160-176, July.
    5. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    6. Muhammad Ali & Syed Ali Raza & Chin-Hong Puah & Mohd Zaini Abd Karim, 2017. "Islamic home financing in Pakistan: a SEM-based approach using modified TPB model," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1156-1177, November.
    7. Jennifer Heiny & Icek Ajzen & Ingrid-Ute Leonhäuser & Peter Schmidt, 2019. "Intentions to Enhance Tourism in Private Households: Explanation and Mediated Effects of Entrepreneurial Experience," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 5(2), pages 128-148, July.
    8. Nguyen, The Ninh & Lobo, Antonio & Greenland, Steven, 2016. "Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: The role of consumers' biospheric values," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 98-108.
    9. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    10. Keen, C. & Wetzels, M., 2001. "Exploring the Preference Structure for Online and Traditional Retail Formats," Working Papers 01.18, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    11. Wan, Calvin & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping & Yu, Ann, 2014. "The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 141-151.
    12. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    14. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    15. Tae-Im Han, 2018. "Determinants of Organic Cotton Apparel Purchase: A Comparison of Young Consumers in the U.S.A. and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    16. van Hoesel, C.P.M. & Goossens, J.H.M. & Kroon, L.G., 2001. "A branch-and-cut approach for solving line planning problems," Research Memorandum 016, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    17. Sumeet Gupta & Haejung Yun & Heng Xu & Hee-Woong Kim, 2017. "An exploratory study on mobile banking adoption in Indian metropolitan and urban areas: a scenario-based experiment," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 127-152, January.
    18. El Barachi, May & Salim, Taghreed Abu & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Mathew, Sujith & Badewi, Amgad & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2022. "The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Leung, Louis & Chen, Cheng, 2019. "E-health/m-health adoption and lifestyle improvements: Exploring the roles of technology readiness, the expectation-confirmation model, and health-related information activities," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 563-575.
    20. Banu Demirel & Ayça Kübra Hızarcı Payne, 2018. "Social Innovation Adoption Behavior: The Case of Zumbara," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:178:y:2018:i:c:p:12-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.