IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v21y1992i2p205-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth A. Bollen

    (University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill)

  • Robert A. Stine

    (University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

Assessing overall fit is a topic of keen interest to structural equation modelers, yet measuring goodness of fit has been hampered by several factors. First, the assumptions that underlie the chi-square tests of model fit often are violated. Second, many fit measures (e.g., Bentler and Bonett's [1980] normed fit index) have unknown statistical distributions so that hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, or comparisons of significant differences in these fit indices are not possible. Finally, modelers have little knowledge about the distribution and behavior of the fit measures for misspecified models or for nonnested models. Given this situation, bootstrapping techniques would appear to be an ideal means to tackle these problems. Indeed, Bentler's (1989) EQS 3.0 and Jöreskog and Sörbom's (forthcoming) LISREL 8 have bootstrap resampling options to bootstrap fit indices. In this article the authors (a) demonstrate that the usual bootstrapping methods will fail when applied to the original data, (b) explain why this occurs, and, (c) propose a modified bootstrap method for the chi-square test statistic for model fit. They include simulated and empirical examples to illustrate their results.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth A. Bollen & Robert A. Stine, 1992. "Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 205-229, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:21:y:1992:i:2:p:205-229
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124192021002004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124192021002004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124192021002004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert Satorra, 1990. "Robustness issues in structural equation modeling: a review of recent developments," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 367-386, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanislav Kolenikov, 2009. "Confirmatory factor analysis using confa," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 9(3), pages 329-373, September.
    2. Junya Kumagai & Mihoko Wakamatsu & Shunsuke Managi, 2021. "Do commuters adapt to in-vehicle crowding on trains?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2357-2399, October.
    3. Kenneth A. Bollen & James B. Kirby & Patrick J. Curran & Pamela M. Paxton & Feinian Chen, 2007. "Latent Variable Models Under Misspecification: Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) Estimators," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 36(1), pages 48-86, August.
    4. Feinian Chen & Kenneth A. Bollen & Pamela Paxton & Patrick J. Curran & James B. Kirby, 2001. "Improper Solutions in Structural Equation Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 29(4), pages 468-508, May.
    5. Kenneth A. Bollen & Patrick J. Curran, 2004. "Autoregressive Latent Trajectory (ALT) Models A Synthesis of Two Traditions," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 32(3), pages 336-383, February.
    6. Merton S. Krause, 2018. "Associational versus correlational research study design and data analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2691-2707, November.
    7. Pasquale Dolce & Natale Lauro, 2015. "Comparing maximum likelihood and PLS estimates for structural equation modeling with formative blocks," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 891-902, May.
    8. Ringle, C.M. & Götz, O & Wetzels, M.G.M. & Wilson, B, 2009. "On the Use of Formative Measurement Specifications in Structural Equation Modelling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study to Compare Covariance-Based and Partial Least Squares Model Estimation Methodologies," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    9. Gülhayat Şimşek & Fatma Noyan, 2012. "Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables: a large sample case study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1571-1581, August.
    10. Betlem Sabrià Bernadó & Xavier Llinàs Audet & Sofia Isus Barado & Cristina Yáñez Aldecoa, 2014. "Estudio empírico de las contrariedades de los demandantes de formación continua en la Instituciones de Educación Superior españolas," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 9, in: Adela García Aracil & Isabel Neira Gómez (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 9, edition 1, volume 9, chapter 37, pages 715-729, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
    11. Kenneth Bollen & Stanislav Kolenikov & Shawn Bauldry, 2014. "Model-Implied Instrumental Variable—Generalized Method of Moments (MIIV-GMM) Estimators for Latent Variable Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 20-50, January.
    12. Sophie Hentschel & Michael Eid & Tanja Kutscher, 2017. "The Influence of Major Life Events and Personality Traits on the Stability of Affective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 719-741, June.
    13. Willem E. Saris, 2001. "The Strength of the Causal Relationship between Living Conditions and Satisfaction," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 30(1), pages 11-34, August.
    14. Germà Coenders & Joan Batista-Foguet & Willem Saris, 2008. "Simple, Efficient and Distribution-free Approach to Interaction Effects in Complex Structural Equation Models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 369-396, June.
    15. Terje Skjerpen, 2008. "Engel elasticities, pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation and bootstrapped standard errors. A case study," Discussion Papers 532, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    16. Manuel Sánchez Pérez, 1996. "A strategy for the assessment of overall model fit in structural equation modeling for business economics," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 6, pages 183-210, Diciembre.
    17. François Sprumont & Ariane Scheffer & Geoffrey Caruso & Eric Cornelis & Francesco Viti, 2022. "Quantifying the Relation between Activity Pattern Complexity and Car Use Using a Partial Least Square Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Valerie Møller & Willem Saris, 2001. "The Relationship between Subjective Well-being and Domain Satisfactions in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 97-114, July.
    19. Albert Satorra, 1991. "Asymptotic robust inferences in the analysis of mean and covariance structures," Economics Working Papers 3, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    20. Raquel Flores-Buils & Antonio Caballer-Miedes & Rosa Mateu-Pérez, 2022. "Resilience in Teachers: Validation of the Spanish Version of the CD-RISC10© Scale in Early Childhood, Primary and Special Education Teachers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:21:y:1992:i:2:p:205-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.