IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i19pt20p2730-2735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of data transfer: double data entry and estimating levels of error

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Atkinson

Abstract

Aims and objectives Most nursing research using quantitative empirical data involves entering information collected on data collection forms into a computer. This paper brings to attention issues related to the introduction of errors during this transfer of data and makes some recommendations as to how this might be dealt with. Background Beyond concerns with the reliability and validity of data collection instruments, the issue of data accuracy and the introduction of errors in research data sets receive little mention in the nursing research literature. Given that studies have reported up to a 26·9 per cent error rate in data transfer (Goldberg et al. Proceedings American Medical Informatics Association, Annual Symposium November 2008), it is important that this potential problem is addressed in the context of nursing research. Design Discursive paper. Conclusions An approach to checking the accuracy of data entered onto a computer via the keyboard is suggested, and a method for estimating the level of confidence that could be claimed regarding the number of errors introduced is outlined. Relevance to clinical practice If nursing is to be investigated by quantitative methods, it would seem that the accuracy of study findings is paramount. This paper identifies one area of research where errors are prone to arise and suggests a method for containing these.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Atkinson, 2012. "Accuracy of data transfer: double data entry and estimating levels of error," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2730-2735, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:19pt20:p:2730-2735
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04353.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04353.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04353.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haegemans, Tom & Snoeck, Monique & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2018. "Entering data correctly: An empirical evaluation of the theory of planned behaviour in the context of manual data acquisition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 12-30.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:19pt20:p:2730-2735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.