IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v149y2016icp187-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advantages of variance reduction techniques in establishing confidence intervals for quantiles

Author

Listed:
  • Grabaskas, Dave
  • Nakayama, Marvin K.
  • Denning, Richard
  • Aldemir, Tunc

Abstract

Over the past two decades, U.S. nuclear power plant regulation has increasingly depended on best-estimate plus uncertainty safety analyses. As a result of the shift to best-estimate analyses, the distribution of the output metric must be compared against a regulatory goal, rather than a single, conservative value. This comparison has historically been conducted using a 95% one-sided confidence interval for the 0.95-quantile of the output distribution, which is usually found following the technique of simple random sampling using order statistics (SRS-OS). While SRS-OS has certain statistical advantages, there are drawbacks related to the available sampling schemes and the accuracy and precision of the resulting value. Recent work has shown that it is possible to establish asymptotically valid confidence intervals for a quantile of the output of a model simulated using variance reduction techniques (VRTs). These VRTs can provide more informative results than SRS-OS. This work compares SRS-OS and the VRTs of antithetic variates and Latin hypercube sampling through several experiments, designed to replicate conditions found in nuclear safety analyses. This work is designed as an initial investigation into the use of VRTs as a tool to satisfy nuclear regulatory requirements, with hope of expanded analyses of VRTs in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Grabaskas, Dave & Nakayama, Marvin K. & Denning, Richard & Aldemir, Tunc, 2016. "Advantages of variance reduction techniques in establishing confidence intervals for quantiles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 187-203.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:149:y:2016:i:c:p:187-203
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015003671
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Falk, Michael, 1986. "On the estimation of the quantile density function," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 69-73, March.
    2. Athanassios N. Avramidis & James R. Wilson, 1998. "Correlation-Induction Techniques for Estimating Quantiles in Simulation Experiments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 574-591, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Xiaoyu & Tamaki, Hitoshi & Sugiyama, Tomoyuki & Maruyama, Yu, 2022. "Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants using multi-fidelity simulations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Alban, Andres & Darji, Hardik A. & Imamura, Atsuki & Nakayama, Marvin K., 2017. "Efficient Monte Carlo methods for estimating failure probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 376-394.
    3. Wu, Shengnan & Zhang, Laibin & Zheng, Wenpei & Liu, Yiliu & Lundteigen, Mary Ann, 2019. "Reliability modeling of subsea SISs partial testing subject to delayed restoration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Yijie Peng & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu & Ilya O. Ryzhov, 2021. "Efficient Sampling Allocation Procedures for Optimal Quantile Selection," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 230-245, January.
    5. Sanchez-Saez, F. & Sánchez, A.I. & Villanueva, J.F. & Carlos, S. & Martorell, S., 2018. "Uncertainty analysis of a large break loss of coolant accident in a pressurized water reactor using non-parametric methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 19-28.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Dong & Marvin K. Nakayama, 2017. "Quantile Estimation with Latin Hypercube Sampling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1678-1695, December.
    2. Kilic, Onur A. & Tunc, Huseyin & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2018. "Heuristic policies for the stochastic economic lot sizing problem with remanufacturing under service level constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1102-1109.
    3. Michael Falk, 1997. "On Mad and Comedians," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 49(4), pages 615-644, December.
    4. E Saliby & R J Paul, 2009. "A farewell to the use of antithetic variates in Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(7), pages 1026-1035, July.
    5. Cheng, Cheng, 1998. "A Berry-Esséen-type theorem of quantile density estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 255-262, August.
    6. Shane G. Henderson & Peter W. Glynn, 2001. "Computing Densities for Markov Chains via Simulation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 375-400, May.
    7. Chang, Kuo-Hao, 2015. "A direct search method for unconstrained quantile-based simulation optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 487-495.
    8. Christos Alexopoulos & David Goldsman & Anup C. Mokashi & Kai-Wen Tien & James R. Wilson, 2019. "Sequest: A Sequential Procedure for Estimating Quantiles in Steady-State Simulations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1162-1183, July.
    9. Dodge, Yadolah & Jurecková, Jana, 1995. "Estimation of quantile density function based on regression quantiles," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 73-78, April.
    10. Emad A. A. Aly & Marilou O. Hervas, 1999. "Nonparametric inference for Zenga's measure of income inequality," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1-2), pages 69-84.
    11. Samuel N. Cohen & Christoph Reisinger & Sheng Wang, 2022. "Estimating risks of option books using neural-SDE market models," Papers 2202.07148, arXiv.org.
    12. Chen, E. Jack & Kelton, W. David, 2006. "Quantile and tolerance-interval estimation in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 520-540, January.
    13. Chaitra H. Nagaraja & Haikady N. Nagaraja, 2020. "Distribution‐free Approximate Methods for Constructing Confidence Intervals for Quantiles," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 75-100, April.
    14. Huei-Wen Teng, 2023. "Importance Sampling for Calculating the Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of the Quadratic Portfolio with t-Distributed Risk Factors," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1125-1154, October.
    15. Futschik, A., 1999. "A new estimate of the mode based on the quantile density," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 145-152, June.
    16. L. Jeff Hong, 2009. "Estimating Quantile Sensitivities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 118-130, February.
    17. T. Glenn Bailey & Paul A. Jensen & David P. Morton, 1999. "Response surface analysis of two‐stage stochastic linear programming with recourse," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(7), pages 753-776, October.
    18. Michael Freimer & Jeffrey Linderoth & Douglas Thomas, 2012. "The impact of sampling methods on bias and variance in stochastic linear programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 51-75, January.
    19. Marc Hallin & Bas Werker, 2003. "Semiparametric efficiency, distribution-freeness, and invariance," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/2119, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Pierre L'Ecuyer & Christiane Lemieux, 2000. "Variance Reduction via Lattice Rules," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1214-1235, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:149:y:2016:i:c:p:187-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.