IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v33y2021i1p230-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Sampling Allocation Procedures for Optimal Quantile Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Yijie Peng

    (Department of Management Science and Information Systems, Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Chun-Hung Chen

    (Department of Systems Engineering and Operations Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030)

  • Michael C. Fu

    (Institute for Systems Research, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)

  • Jian-Qiang Hu

    (Department of Management Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Ilya O. Ryzhov

    (Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)

Abstract

We propose a dynamic sampling allocation and selection paradigm for finding the alternative with the optimal quantile in a Bayesian framework. Myopic allocation policies (MAPs), analogous to existing methods in classic ranking and selection for selecting the alternative with the optimal mean, and computationally efficient selection policies are derived for selecting the alternative with the optimal quantile. Under certain conditions, we prove that the proposed MAPs and selection procedures are consistent, which means that the best quantile would be eventually correctly selected as the sample size goes to infinity. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed schemes can significantly improve the performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yijie Peng & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu & Ilya O. Ryzhov, 2021. "Efficient Sampling Allocation Procedures for Optimal Quantile Selection," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 230-245, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:1:p:230-245
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2019.0946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2019.0946
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2019.0946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernd Heidergott & Warren Volk-Makarewicz, 2016. "A Measure-Valued Differentiation Approach to Sensitivities of Quantiles," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 293-317, February.
    2. Guangwu Liu & Liu Jeff Hong, 2009. "Kernel estimation of quantile sensitivities," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(6), pages 511-525, September.
    3. Michael C. Fu & L. Jeff Hong & Jian-Qiang Hu, 2009. "Conditional Monte Carlo Estimation of Quantile Sensitivities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 2019-2027, December.
    4. Darrell Duffie, 2012. "Over-The-Counter Markets," Introductory Chapters, in: Dark Markets: Asset Pricing and Information Transmission in Over-the-Counter Markets, Princeton University Press.
    5. Batur, D. & Choobineh, F., 2010. "A quantile-based approach to system selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 764-772, May.
    6. Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu & Chun-Hung Chen & Xiaoping Xiong, 2007. "Simulation Allocation for Determining the Best Design in the Presence of Correlated Sampling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 101-111, February.
    7. L. Jeff Hong, 2009. "Estimating Quantile Sensitivities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 118-130, February.
    8. Grabaskas, Dave & Nakayama, Marvin K. & Denning, Richard & Aldemir, Tunc, 2016. "Advantages of variance reduction techniques in establishing confidence intervals for quantiles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 187-203.
    9. Guangxin Jiang & Michael C. Fu, 2015. "Technical Note—On Estimating Quantile Sensitivities via Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 435-441, April.
    10. Ilya O. Ryzhov, 2016. "On the Convergence Rates of Expected Improvement Methods," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1515-1528, December.
    11. L. Jeff Hong & Guangwu Liu, 2009. "Simulating Sensitivities of Conditional Value at Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 281-293, February.
    12. Yijie Peng & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu, 2016. "Dynamic Sampling Allocation and Design Selection," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 195-208, May.
    13. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504, October.
    14. Xing Jin & Michael C. Fu & Xiaoping Xiong, 2003. "Probabilistic Error Bounds for Simulation Quantile Estimators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 230-246, February.
    15. Stephen E. Chick & Koichiro Inoue, 2001. "New Procedures to Select the Best Simulated System Using Common Random Numbers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1133-1149, August.
    16. Stephen E. Chick & Jürgen Branke & Christian Schmidt, 2010. "Sequential Sampling to Myopically Maximize the Expected Value of Information," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 71-80, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhongshun Shi & Yijie Peng & Leyuan Shi & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu, 2022. "Dynamic Sampling Allocation Under Finite Simulation Budget for Feasibility Determination," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 557-568, January.
    2. Cheng, Zhenxia & Luo, Jun & Wu, Ruijing, 2023. "On the finite-sample statistical validity of adaptive fully sequential procedures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 266-278.
    3. Dongwook Shin & Mark Broadie & Assaf Zeevi, 2022. "Practical Nonparametric Sampling Strategies for Quantile-Based Ordinal Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 752-768, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yijie Peng & Michael C. Fu & Bernd Heidergott & Henry Lam, 2020. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Monte Carlo Simulation: Toward Data-Driven Stochastic Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1896-1912, November.
    2. Peter W. Glynn & Yijie Peng & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu, 2021. "Computing Sensitivities for Distortion Risk Measures," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1520-1532, October.
    3. Jiaqiao Hu & Yijie Peng & Gongbo Zhang & Qi Zhang, 2022. "A Stochastic Approximation Method for Simulation-Based Quantile Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2889-2907, November.
    4. J P C Kleijnen & W C M van Beers, 2013. "Monotonicity-preserving bootstrapped Kriging metamodels for expensive simulations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(5), pages 708-717, May.
    5. Guangxin Jiang & Michael C. Fu, 2015. "Technical Note—On Estimating Quantile Sensitivities via Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 435-441, April.
    6. He, Zhijian, 2022. "Sensitivity estimation of conditional value at risk using randomized quasi-Monte Carlo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 229-242.
    7. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Tsanakas, Andreas & Millossovich, Pietro, 2018. "Euler allocations in the presence of non-linear reinsurance: Comment on Major (2018)," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 29-31.
    8. Silvana M. Pesenti & Pietro Millossovich & Andreas Tsanakas, 2023. "Differential Quantile-Based Sensitivity in Discontinuous Models," Papers 2310.06151, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    9. Xi Chen & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2016. "Efficient VaR and CVaR Measurement via Stochastic Kriging," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 629-644, November.
    10. Weihuan Huang & Nifei Lin & L. Jeff Hong, 2022. "Monte-Carlo Estimation of CoVaR," Papers 2210.06148, arXiv.org.
    11. Bernd Heidergott & Warren Volk-Makarewicz, 2016. "A Measure-Valued Differentiation Approach to Sensitivities of Quantiles," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 293-317, February.
    12. L. Jeff Hong & Yi Yang & Liwei Zhang, 2011. "Sequential Convex Approximations to Joint Chance Constrained Programs: A Monte Carlo Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 617-630, June.
    13. L. Jeff Hong & Sandeep Juneja & Jun Luo, 2014. "Estimating Sensitivities of Portfolio Credit Risk Using Monte Carlo," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 848-865, November.
    14. Zhongshun Shi & Yijie Peng & Leyuan Shi & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu, 2022. "Dynamic Sampling Allocation Under Finite Simulation Budget for Feasibility Determination," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 557-568, January.
    15. Zhenyu Cui & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu & Yanchu Liu & Yijie Peng & Lingjiong Zhu, 2020. "On the Variance of Single-Run Unbiased Stochastic Derivative Estimators," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 390-407, April.
    16. Yijie Peng & Li Xiao & Bernd Heidergott & L. Jeff Hong & Henry Lam, 2022. "A New Likelihood Ratio Method for Training Artificial Neural Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 638-655, January.
    17. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    18. Huang, Zhenzhen & Kwok, Yue Kuen & Xu, Ziqing, 2024. "Efficient algorithms for calculating risk measures and risk contributions in copula credit risk models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 132-150.
    19. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    20. Katja Schilling & Daniel Bauer & Marcus C. Christiansen & Alexander Kling, 2020. "Decomposing Dynamic Risks into Risk Components," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5738-5756, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:1:p:230-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.