IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v168y2006i2p520-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantile and tolerance-interval estimation in simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, E. Jack
  • Kelton, W. David

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, E. Jack & Kelton, W. David, 2006. "Quantile and tolerance-interval estimation in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 520-540, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:168:y:2006:i:2:p:520-540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(04)00324-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen, Pranab Kumar, 1972. "On the Bahadur representation of sample quantiles for sequences of [phi]-mixing random variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 77-95, March.
    2. P. Heidelberger & P. A. W. Lewis, 1984. "Quantile Estimation in Dependent Sequences," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 185-209, February.
    3. Athanassios N. Avramidis & James R. Wilson, 1998. "Correlation-Induction Techniques for Estimating Quantiles in Simulation Experiments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 574-591, August.
    4. Andrew F. Seila, 1982. "A Batching Approach to Quantile Estimation in Regenerative Simulations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 573-581, May.
    5. Jason C. Hsu & Barry L. Nelson, 1990. "Control Variates for Quantile Estimation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(7), pages 835-851, July.
    6. Timothy C. Hesterberg & Barry L. Nelson, 1998. "Control Variates for Probability and Quantile Estimation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(9), pages 1295-1312, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Batur, D. & Choobineh, F., 2010. "A quantile-based approach to system selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 764-772, May.
    2. Christos Alexopoulos & David Goldsman & Anup C. Mokashi & Kai-Wen Tien & James R. Wilson, 2019. "Sequest: A Sequential Procedure for Estimating Quantiles in Steady-State Simulations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1162-1183, July.
    3. Nour-Eddine Berrahou & Salim Bouzebda & Lahcen Douge, 2024. "The Bahadur Representation for Empirical and Smooth Quantile Estimators Under Association," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1-37, June.
    4. Demet Batur & F. Fred Choobineh, 2021. "Selecting the Best Alternative Based on Its Quantile," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 657-671, May.
    5. Batur, Demet & Bekki, Jennifer M. & Chen, Xi, 2018. "Quantile regression metamodeling: Toward improved responsiveness in the high-tech electronics manufacturing industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 212-224.
    6. T H Moon & S Y Sohn, 2011. "Survival analysis for technology credit scoring adjusting total perception," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(6), pages 1159-1168, June.
    7. Batur, D. & Choobineh, F., 2012. "Stochastic dominance based comparison for system selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 661-672.
    8. Moon, Tae Hee & Sohn, So Young, 2008. "Technology scoring model for reflecting evaluator's perception within confidence limits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 981-989, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. Jeff Hong, 2009. "Estimating Quantile Sensitivities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 118-130, February.
    2. Shane G. Henderson & Peter W. Glynn, 2001. "Computing Densities for Markov Chains via Simulation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 375-400, May.
    3. Xing Jin & Michael C. Fu & Xiaoping Xiong, 2003. "Probabilistic Error Bounds for Simulation Quantile Estimators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 230-246, February.
    4. Christos Alexopoulos & David Goldsman & Anup C. Mokashi & Kai-Wen Tien & James R. Wilson, 2019. "Sequest: A Sequential Procedure for Estimating Quantiles in Steady-State Simulations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1162-1183, July.
    5. Samuel N. Cohen & Christoph Reisinger & Sheng Wang, 2022. "Estimating risks of option books using neural-SDE market models," Papers 2202.07148, arXiv.org.
    6. Huei-Wen Teng, 2023. "Importance Sampling for Calculating the Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of the Quadratic Portfolio with t-Distributed Risk Factors," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1125-1154, October.
    7. Hui Dong & Marvin K. Nakayama, 2017. "Quantile Estimation with Latin Hypercube Sampling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1678-1695, December.
    8. Guangwu Liu & Liu Jeff Hong, 2009. "Kernel estimation of quantile sensitivities," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(6), pages 511-525, September.
    9. Mingbin Ben Feng & Eunhye Song, 2020. "Efficient Nested Simulation Experiment Design via the Likelihood Ratio Method," Papers 2008.13087, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    10. Xi Chen & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2016. "Efficient VaR and CVaR Measurement via Stochastic Kriging," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 629-644, November.
    11. Athanassios N. Avramidis & James R. Wilson, 1998. "Correlation-Induction Techniques for Estimating Quantiles in Simulation Experiments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 574-591, August.
    12. Park, Dae S. & Kim, Yun B. & Shin, Key I. & Willemain, Thomas R., 2001. "Simulation output analysis using the threshold bootstrap," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 17-28, October.
    13. Michael Freimer & Jeffrey Linderoth & Douglas Thomas, 2012. "The impact of sampling methods on bias and variance in stochastic linear programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 51-75, January.
    14. Batur, D. & Choobineh, F., 2010. "A quantile-based approach to system selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 764-772, May.
    15. Kilic, Onur A. & Tunc, Huseyin & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2018. "Heuristic policies for the stochastic economic lot sizing problem with remanufacturing under service level constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1102-1109.
    16. Songhao Wang & Szu Hui Ng & William Benjamin Haskell, 2022. "A Multilevel Simulation Optimization Approach for Quantile Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 569-585, January.
    17. Qinchi Zhang & Wenzhi Yang & Shuhe Hu, 2014. "On Bahadur representation for sample quantiles under α-mixing sequence," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 285-299, May.
    18. Pierre L'Ecuyer & Christiane Lemieux, 2000. "Variance Reduction via Lattice Rules," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1214-1235, September.
    19. E Saliby & R J Paul, 2009. "A farewell to the use of antithetic variates in Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(7), pages 1026-1035, July.
    20. Yijun Zuo, 2015. "Bahadur representations for bootstrap quantiles," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(5), pages 597-610, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:168:y:2006:i:2:p:520-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.