IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v142y2015icp310-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refined Stratified Sampling for efficient Monte Carlo based uncertainty quantification

Author

Listed:
  • Shields, Michael D.
  • Teferra, Kirubel
  • Hapij, Adam
  • Daddazio, Raymond P.

Abstract

A general adaptive approach rooted in stratified sampling (SS) is proposed for sample-based uncertainty quantification (UQ). To motivate its use in this context the space-filling, orthogonality, and projective properties of SS are compared with simple random sampling and Latin hypercube sampling (LHS). SS is demonstrated to provide attractive properties for certain classes of problems. The proposed approach, Refined Stratified Sampling (RSS), capitalizes on these properties through an adaptive process that adds samples sequentially by dividing the existing subspaces of a stratified design. RSS is proven to reduce variance compared to traditional stratified sample extension methods while providing comparable or enhanced variance reduction when compared to sample size extension methods for LHS – which do not afford the same degree of flexibility to facilitate a truly adaptive UQ process. An initial investigation of optimal stratification is presented and motivates the potential for major advances in variance reduction through optimally designed RSS. Potential paths for extension of the method to high dimension are discussed. Two examples are provided. The first involves UQ for a low dimensional function where convergence is evaluated analytically. The second presents a study to asses the response variability of a floating structure to an underwater shock.

Suggested Citation

  • Shields, Michael D. & Teferra, Kirubel & Hapij, Adam & Daddazio, Raymond P., 2015. "Refined Stratified Sampling for efficient Monte Carlo based uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 310-325.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:142:y:2015:i:c:p:310-325
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015001726
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rennen, G. & Husslage, B.G.M. & van Dam, E.R. & den Hertog, D., 2009. "Nested Maximin Latin Hypercube Designs," Discussion Paper 2009-06, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Peter Z. G. Qian, 2009. "Nested Latin hypercube designs," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(4), pages 957-970.
    3. Tong, Charles, 2006. "Refinement strategies for stratified sampling methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1257-1265.
    4. Sallaberry, C.J. & Helton, J.C. & Hora, S.C., 2008. "Extension of Latin hypercube samples with correlated variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 1047-1059.
    5. Janssen, Hans, 2013. "Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and sampling convergence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 123-132.
    6. Teferra, Kirubel & Shields, Michael D. & Hapij, Adam & Daddazio, Raymond P., 2014. "Mapping model validation metrics to subject matter expert scores for model adequacy assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 9-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiron, Marie & Genest, Christian & Morio, Jérôme & Dubreuil, Sylvain, 2023. "Failure probability estimation through high-dimensional elliptical distribution modeling with multiple importance sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Tong, Yanjie & Tien, Iris, 2019. "Analytical probability propagation method for reliability analysis of general complex networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 21-30.
    3. Sakurahara, Tatsuya & Schumock, Grant & Reihani, Seyed & Kee, Ernie & Mohaghegh, Zahra, 2019. "Simulation-Informed Probabilistic Methodology for Common Cause Failure Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 84-99.
    4. Chuanjun Zhao & Suge Wang & Deyu Li, 2016. "Determining Fuzzy Membership for Sentiment Classification: A Three-Layer Sentiment Propagation Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, November.
    5. Priscilla Avegliano & Jaime Simão Sichman, 2023. "Equation-Based Versus Agent-Based Models: Why Not Embrace Both for an Efficient Parameter Calibration?," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 26(4), pages 1-3.
    6. Casado, Ramon Swell Gomes Rodrigues & Alencar, Marcelo Hazin & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2022. "Combining a multidimensional risk evaluation with an implicit enumeration algorithm to tackle the portfolio selection problem of a natural gas pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Medeiros, C.P. & Alencar, M.H. & de Almeida, A.T., 2017. "Multidimensional risk evaluation of natural gas pipelines based on a multicriteria decision model using visualization tools and statistical tests for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 268-276.
    8. Sankaranarayanan, Sriram & Feijoo, Felipe & Siddiqui, Sauleh, 2018. "Sensitivity and covariance in stochastic complementarity problems with an application to North American natural gas markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 25-36.
    9. Thalles Vitelli Garcez & Helder Tenório Cavalcanti & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, 2021. "A hybrid decision support model using Grey Relational Analysis and the Additive-Veto Model for solving multicriteria decision-making problems: an approach to supplier selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 199-231, September.
    10. Anurag Yedla & Fatemeh Davoudi Kakhki & Ali Jannesari, 2020. "Predictive Modeling for Occupational Safety Outcomes and Days Away from Work Analysis in Mining Operations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Shields, Michael D. & Zhang, Jiaxin, 2016. "The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 96-108.
    12. Sui, Quan & Zhang, Rui & Wu, Chuantao & Wei, Fanrong & Lin, Xiangning & Li, Zhengtian, 2020. "Stochastic scheduling of an electric vessel-based energy management system in pelagic clustering islands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey & Diwakar Shukla, 2022. "Stratified linear systematic sampling based clustering approach for detection of financial risk group by mining of big data," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1239-1253, June.
    14. Shields, Michael D., 2018. "Adaptive Monte Carlo analysis for strongly nonlinear stochastic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 207-224.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Xu & Jiajie Chen & Peter Z. G. Qian, 2015. "Sequentially Refined Latin Hypercube Designs: Reusing Every Point," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1696-1706, December.
    2. Hou, Tianfeng & Nuyens, Dirk & Roels, Staf & Janssen, Hans, 2019. "Quasi-Monte Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and error estimation in engineering applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Vikram V. Garg & Roy H. Stogner, 2017. "Hierarchical Latin Hypercube Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 673-682, April.
    4. Blatman, Géraud & Sudret, Bruno, 2010. "Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1216-1229.
    5. Hao Chen & Yan Zhang & Xue Yang, 2021. "Uniform projection nested Latin hypercube designs," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 2031-2045, August.
    6. Sui Peng & Huixiang Chen & Yong Lin & Tong Shu & Xingyu Lin & Junjie Tang & Wenyuan Li & Weijie Wu, 2019. "Probabilistic Power Flow for Hybrid AC/DC Grids with Ninth-Order Polynomial Normal Transformation and Inherited Latin Hypercube Sampling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    8. Abdirizak Omar & Mouadh Addassi & Volker Vahrenkamp & Hussein Hoteit, 2021. "Co-Optimization of CO 2 Storage and Enhanced Gas Recovery Using Carbonated Water and Supercritical CO 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Janssen, Hans, 2013. "Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and sampling convergence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 123-132.
    10. Kaya, Gulsum Kubra & Hocaoglu, Mehmet Fatih, 2020. "Semi-quantitative application to the Functional Resonance Analysis Method for supporting safety management in a complex health-care process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Edwin Dam & Bart Husslage & Dick Hertog, 2010. "One-dimensional nested maximin designs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 287-306, February.
    12. Bui, Ha & Sakurahara, Tatsuya & Pence, Justin & Reihani, Seyed & Kee, Ernie & Mohaghegh, Zahra, 2019. "An algorithm for enhancing spatiotemporal resolution of probabilistic risk assessment to address emergent safety concerns in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 405-428.
    13. Sukanta Dash & Baidya Nath Mandal & Rajender Parsad, 2020. "On the construction of nested orthogonal Latin hypercube designs," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 347-353, April.
    14. Kotireddy, Rajesh & Hoes, Pieter-Jan & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2018. "A methodology for performance robustness assessment of low-energy buildings using scenario analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 428-442.
    15. Zio, E. & Pedroni, N., 2009. "Functional failure analysis of a thermal–hydraulic passive system by means of Line Sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1764-1781.
    16. Chen, Xi & Zhou, Qiang, 2017. "Sequential design strategies for mean response surface metamodeling via stochastic kriging with adaptive exploration and exploitation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 575-585.
    17. Yi-Kuei Lin & Cheng-Fu Huang & Chin-Chia Chang, 2022. "Reliability of spare routing via intersectional minimal paths within budget and time constraints by simulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 345-368, May.
    18. Karanki, Durga Rao & Dang, Vinh N., 2016. "Quantification of Dynamic Event Trees – A comparison with event trees for MLOCA scenario," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 19-31.
    19. Yongkai An & Wenxi Lu & Weiguo Cheng, 2015. "Surrogate Model Application to the Identification of Optimal Groundwater Exploitation Scheme Based on Regression Kriging Method—A Case Study of Western Jilin Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Crombecq, K. & Laermans, E. & Dhaene, T., 2011. "Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 683-696, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:142:y:2015:i:c:p:310-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.