IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i8p8897-8918d53399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surrogate Model Application to the Identification of Optimal Groundwater Exploitation Scheme Based on Regression Kriging Method—A Case Study of Western Jilin Province

Author

Listed:
  • Yongkai An

    (Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China)

  • Wenxi Lu

    (Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China)

  • Weiguo Cheng

    (Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China)

Abstract

This paper introduces a surrogate model to identify an optimal exploitation scheme, while the western Jilin province was selected as the study area. A numerical simulation model of groundwater flow was established first, and four exploitation wells were set in the Tongyu county and Qian Gorlos county respectively so as to supply water to Daan county. Second, the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) method was used to collect data in the feasible region for input variables. A surrogate model of the numerical simulation model of groundwater flow was developed using the regression kriging method. An optimization model was established to search an optimal groundwater exploitation scheme using the minimum average drawdown of groundwater table and the minimum cost of groundwater exploitation as multi-objective functions. Finally, the surrogate model was invoked by the optimization model in the process of solving the optimization problem. Results show that the relative error and root mean square error of the groundwater table drawdown between the simulation model and the surrogate model for 10 validation samples are both lower than 5%, which is a high approximation accuracy. The contrast between the surrogate-based simulation optimization model and the conventional simulation optimization model for solving the same optimization problem, shows the former only needs 5.5 hours, and the latter needs 25 days. The above results indicate that the surrogate model developed in this study could not only considerably reduce the computational burden of the simulation optimization process, but also maintain high computational accuracy. This can thus provide an effective method for identifying an optimal groundwater exploitation scheme quickly and accurately.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongkai An & Wenxi Lu & Weiguo Cheng, 2015. "Surrogate Model Application to the Identification of Optimal Groundwater Exploitation Scheme Based on Regression Kriging Method—A Case Study of Western Jilin Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:8:p:8897-8918:d:53399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/8/8897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/8/8897/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sallaberry, C.J. & Helton, J.C. & Hora, S.C., 2008. "Extension of Latin hypercube samples with correlated variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 1047-1059.
    2. Sonja Kuhnt & David Steinberg, 2010. "Design and analysis of computer experiments," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 94(4), pages 307-309, December.
    3. K. Modis & D. Sideri, 2015. "Spatiotemporal estimation of land subsidence and ground water level decline in West Thessaly basin, Greece," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(2), pages 939-954, March.
    4. Zhang, Luping & Wong, T.N., 2015. "An object-coding genetic algorithm for integrated process planning and scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 434-444.
    5. Singh, Ajay, 2014. "Simulation–optimization modeling for conjunctive water use management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 23-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Zhaodan & Zhu, Tingju & Cai, Ximing, 2023. "Hydro-agro-economic optimization for irrigated farming in an arid region: The Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Fateme Heydari & Bahram Saghafian & Majid Delavar, 2016. "Coupled Quantity-Quality Simulation-Optimization Model for Conjunctive Surface-Groundwater Use," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(12), pages 4381-4397, September.
    3. Ejovi Akpojevwe Abafe & Yonas T. Bahta & Henry Jordaan, 2022. "Exploring Biblioshiny for Historical Assessment of Global Research on Sustainable Use of Water in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-34, August.
    4. Wang, Rong & Huang, Guanhua & Xu, Xu & Ren, Dongyang & Gou, Jiachao & Wu, Zhangsheng, 2022. "Significant differences in agro-hydrological processes and water productivity between canal- and well-irrigated areas in an arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    5. Alireza Nouri & Bahram Saghafian & Majid Delavar & Mohammad Reza Bazargan-Lari, 2019. "Agent-Based Modeling for Evaluation of Crop Pattern and Water Management Policies," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(11), pages 3707-3720, September.
    6. Janssen, Hans, 2013. "Monte-Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and sampling convergence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 123-132.
    7. Dehghanipour, Amir Hossein & Schoups, Gerrit & Zahabiyoun, Bagher & Babazadeh, Hossein, 2020. "Meeting agricultural and environmental water demand in endorheic irrigated river basins: A simulation-optimization approach applied to the Urmia Lake basin in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Cui, Da & Wang, Guoqiang & Lu, Yanpeng & Sun, Kangkang, 2020. "Reliability design and optimization of the planetary gear by a GA based on the DEM and Kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    9. Hou, Tianfeng & Nuyens, Dirk & Roels, Staf & Janssen, Hans, 2019. "Quasi-Monte Carlo based uncertainty analysis: Sampling efficiency and error estimation in engineering applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Vikram V. Garg & Roy H. Stogner, 2017. "Hierarchical Latin Hypercube Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 673-682, April.
    11. Xu Zhang & Hua Zhang & Jin Yao, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Integrated Process Planning and Scheduling Considering Energy Savings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-31, November.
    12. Zhu, Xuedong & Son, Junbo & Zhang, Xi & Wu, Jianguo, 2023. "Constraint programming and logic-based Benders decomposition for the integrated process planning and scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Jin Huang & Liangliang Jin & Chaoyong Zhang, 2017. "Mathematical Modeling and a Hybrid NSGA-II Algorithm for Process Planning Problem Considering Machining Cost and Carbon Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Bui, Ha & Sakurahara, Tatsuya & Pence, Justin & Reihani, Seyed & Kee, Ernie & Mohaghegh, Zahra, 2019. "An algorithm for enhancing spatiotemporal resolution of probabilistic risk assessment to address emergent safety concerns in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 405-428.
    15. Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Shanshan & Yue, Qing & Mao, Xiaomin & Guo, Ping, 2021. "Distributed AquaCrop simulation-nonlinear multi-objective dependent-chance programming for irrigation water resources management under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    16. Niu, G. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Liu, J. & Fan, Y.R., 2016. "Crop planning and water resource allocation for sustainable development of an irrigation region in China under multiple uncertainties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 53-69.
    17. Zio, E. & Pedroni, N., 2009. "Functional failure analysis of a thermal–hydraulic passive system by means of Line Sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1764-1781.
    18. Chenglong Zhang & Qiong Yue & Ping Guo, 2019. "A Nonlinear Inexact Two-Stage Management Model for Agricultural Water Allocation under Uncertainty Based on the Heihe River Water Diversion Plan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Jiang, Yao & Xu, Xu & Huang, Quanzhong & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2016. "Optimizing regional irrigation water use by integrating a two-level optimization model and an agro-hydrological model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 76-88.
    20. Zhang, Haowei & Xie, Junwei & Ge, Jiaang & Zhang, Zhaojian & Zong, Binfeng, 2019. "A hybrid adaptively genetic algorithm for task scheduling problem in the phased array radar," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 868-878.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:8:p:8897-8918:d:53399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.