IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v142y2015icp279-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remaining useful life estimation based on discriminating shapelet extraction

Author

Listed:
  • Malinowski, Simon
  • Chebel-Morello, Brigitte
  • Zerhouni, Noureddine

Abstract

In the Prognostics and Health Management domain, estimating the remaining useful life (RUL) of critical machinery is a challenging task. Various research topics including data acquisition, fusion, diagnostics and prognostics are involved in this domain. This paper presents an approach, based on shapelet extraction, to estimate the RUL of equipment. This approach extracts, in an offline step, discriminative rul-shapelets from an history of run-to-failure data. These rul-shapelets are patterns that are selected for their correlation with the remaining useful life of the equipment. In other words, every selected rul-shapelet conveys its own information about the RUL of the equipment. In an online step, these rul-shapelets are compared to testing units and the ones that match these units are used to estimate their RULs. Therefore, RUL estimation is based on patterns that have been selected for their high correlation with the RUL. This approach is different from classical similarity-based approaches that attempt to match complete testing units (or only late instants of testing units) with training ones to estimate the RUL. The performance of our approach is evaluated on a case study on the remaining useful life estimation of turbofan engines and performance is compared with other similarity-based approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Malinowski, Simon & Chebel-Morello, Brigitte & Zerhouni, Noureddine, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation based on discriminating shapelet extraction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 279-288.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:142:y:2015:i:c:p:279-288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015001532
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cadini, F. & Zio, E. & Avram, D., 2009. "Model-based Monte Carlo state estimation for condition-based component replacement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 752-758.
    2. Le Son, Khanh & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoît, 2013. "Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: A comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 165-175.
    3. Fink, Olga & Zio, Enrico & Weidmann, Ulrich, 2014. "Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 198-206.
    4. Fang, Xiaolei & Zhou, Rensheng & Gebraeel, Nagi, 2015. "An adaptive functional regression-based prognostic model for applications with missing data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 266-274.
    5. Zio, Enrico & Di Maio, Francesco, 2010. "A data-driven fuzzy approach for predicting the remaining useful life in dynamic failure scenarios of a nuclear system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 49-57.
    6. Xi, Zhimin & Jing, Rong & Wang, Pingfeng & Hu, Chao, 2014. "A copula-based sampling method for data-driven prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 72-82.
    7. García Nieto, P.J. & García-Gonzalo, E. & Sánchez Lasheras, F. & de Cos Juez, F.J., 2015. "Hybrid PSO–SVM-based method for forecasting of the remaining useful life for aircraft engines and evaluation of its reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 219-231.
    8. Moghaddass, Ramin & Zuo, Ming J., 2014. "An integrated framework for online diagnostic and prognostic health monitoring using a multistate deterioration process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 92-104.
    9. Tamilselvan, Prasanna & Wang, Pingfeng, 2013. "Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 124-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wen, Pengfei & Zhao, Shuai & Chen, Shaowei & Li, Yong, 2021. "A generalized remaining useful life prediction method for complex systems based on composite health indicator," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Zhao, Zeqi & Bin Liang, & Wang, Xueqian & Lu, Weining, 2017. "Remaining useful life prediction of aircraft engine based on degradation pattern learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 74-83.
    3. Belkacem, Lobna & Simeu-Abazi, Zineb & Dhouibi, Hedi & Gascard, Eric & Messaoud, Hassani, 2017. "Diagnostic and prognostic of hybrid dynamic systems: Modeling and RUL evaluation for two maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 98-109.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Dahidi, Sameer & Di Maio, Francesco & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Remaining useful life estimation in heterogeneous fleets working under variable operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 109-124.
    2. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    3. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Downey, Austin & Lui, Yu-Hui & Hu, Chao & Laflamme, Simon & Hu, Shan, 2019. "Physics-based prognostics of lithium-ion battery using non-linear least squares with dynamic bounds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Medjaher, Kamal, 2019. "A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 251-262.
    6. Fang, Xiaolei & Paynabar, Kamran & Gebraeel, Nagi, 2017. "Multistream sensor fusion-based prognostics model for systems with single failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 322-331.
    7. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Wang, Pingfeng & Taek Yoon, Joung, 2012. "Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 120-135.
    8. Yuanju Qu & Zengtao Hou, 2022. "Degradation principle of machines influenced by maintenance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1521-1530, June.
    9. Tamilselvan, Prasanna & Wang, Pingfeng, 2013. "Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 124-135.
    10. Zhiguo Zeng & Francesco Di Maio & Enrico Zio & Rui Kang, 2017. "A hierarchical decision-making framework for the assessment of the prediction capability of prognostic methods," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(1), pages 36-52, February.
    11. Baraldi, Piero & Mangili, Francesca & Zio, Enrico, 2013. "Investigation of uncertainty treatment capability of model-based and data-driven prognostic methods using simulated data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 94-108.
    12. Vega, Manuel A. & Hu, Zhen & Fillmore, Travis B. & Smith, Matthew D. & Todd, Michael D., 2021. "A Novel Framework for Integration of Abstracted Inspection Data and Structural Health Monitoring for Damage Prognosis of Miter Gates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    14. Santhosh, T.V. & Gopika, V. & Ghosh, A.K. & Fernandes, B.G., 2018. "An approach for reliability prediction of instrumentation & control cables by artificial neural networks and Weibull theory for probabilistic safety assessment of NPPs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 31-44.
    15. Xi, Zhimin & Zhao, Xiangxue, 2019. "An enhanced copula-based method for data-driven prognostics considering insufficient training units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 181-194.
    16. Guishuang Tian & Shaoping Wang & Jian Shi & Yajing Qiao, 2022. "State Estimation and Remaining Useful Life Prediction of PMSTM Based on a Combination of SIR and HSMM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Sameer Al-Dahidi & Francesco Di Maio & Piero Baraldi & Enrico Zio, 2017. "A locally adaptive ensemble approach for data-driven prognostics of heterogeneous fleets," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(4), pages 350-363, August.
    18. Fink, Olga & Zio, Enrico & Weidmann, Ulrich, 2014. "Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 198-206.
    19. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    20. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:142:y:2015:i:c:p:279-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.