IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v164y2017icp98-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic and prognostic of hybrid dynamic systems: Modeling and RUL evaluation for two maintenance policies

Author

Listed:
  • Belkacem, Lobna
  • Simeu-Abazi, Zineb
  • Dhouibi, Hedi
  • Gascard, Eric
  • Messaoud, Hassani

Abstract

In the industrial sector, maintenance plays a very important role in carrying out production by increasing system reliability and availability. Thee maintenance decision is based primarily on diagnostic modules, prognostics and decision support. Diagnostic consists of detection and isolation of faults, while prognostic consists of prediction of the remaining useful life of systems. Moreover, recent industrial systems are naturally hybrid: their dynamic behavior is both continuous and discrete. This paper presents an integrating architecture of diagnostic and prognostic in a hybrid dynamic system. Indeed, the diagnostic system is based on controlling task execution times during system operation. This method is based on a general modeling approach using hybrid automata. The model proposed is detailed by studying a two-tank system. To validate the model, a Stateflow controller is used. These failures are anticipated by a prognostics process based on a prediction of the remaining life for each component by taking maintenance policy into account. Two new methods are compared: ABAO (As Bad As Old) and AGAN (As Good As New), based on the type of repair strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Belkacem, Lobna & Simeu-Abazi, Zineb & Dhouibi, Hedi & Gascard, Eric & Messaoud, Hassani, 2017. "Diagnostic and prognostic of hybrid dynamic systems: Modeling and RUL evaluation for two maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 98-109.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:164:y:2017:i:c:p:98-109
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016301272
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hai-Kun Wang & Yan-Feng Li & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation under degradation and shock damage," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 200-208, June.
    2. Traore, M. & Chammas, A. & Duviella, E., 2015. "Supervision and prognosis architecture based on dynamical classification method for the predictive maintenance of dynamical evolving systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 120-131.
    3. Zhang, Mimi & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2015. "Degradation-based maintenance decision using stochastic filtering for systems under imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 531-541.
    4. Al-Dahidi, Sameer & Di Maio, Francesco & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Remaining useful life estimation in heterogeneous fleets working under variable operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 109-124.
    5. Khorasgani, Hamed & Biswas, Gautam & Sankararaman, Shankar, 2016. "Methodologies for system-level remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 8-18.
    6. Malinowski, Simon & Chebel-Morello, Brigitte & Zerhouni, Noureddine, 2015. "Remaining useful life estimation based on discriminating shapelet extraction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 279-288.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Ruijun & Cheng, Yu & Chen, Dewang & Song, Haifeng, 2021. "Online quantitative safety monitoring approach for unattended train operation system considering stochastic factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Soleimani, Morteza & Campean, Felician & Neagu, Daniel, 2021. "Integration of Hidden Markov Modelling and Bayesian Network for fault detection and prediction of complex engineered systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Zhao, Zeyun & Wang, Jia & Tao, Qian & Li, Andong & Chen, Yiyang, 2024. "An unknown wafer surface defect detection approach based on Incremental Learning for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Zeqi & Bin Liang, & Wang, Xueqian & Lu, Weining, 2017. "Remaining useful life prediction of aircraft engine based on degradation pattern learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 74-83.
    2. Xiangang Cao & Pengfei Li & Song Ming, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction-Based Maintenance Decision Model for Stochastic Deterioration Equipment under Data-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Kamei, Sayaka & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2023. "A comparison study of centralized and decentralized federated learning approaches utilizing the transformer architecture for estimating remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Zhang, Jian-Xun & Si, Xiao-Sheng & Du, Dang-Bo & Hu, Chang-Hua & Hu, Chen, 2020. "A novel iterative approach of lifetime estimation for standby systems with deteriorating spare parts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Giorgio, Massimiliano & Pulcini, Gianpaolo, 2018. "A new state-dependent degradation process and related model misidentification problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1027-1038.
    6. Wen, Pengfei & Zhao, Shuai & Chen, Shaowei & Li, Yong, 2021. "A generalized remaining useful life prediction method for complex systems based on composite health indicator," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    8. Dai, Anshu & Wang, Xin & Li, Yu & Li, Ting & He, Shuguang, 2023. "Design of a performance-based warranty policy with replacement–repair strategy and cumulative cost threshold," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    9. Zhao, Xiujie & Chen, Piao & Gaudoin, Olivier & Doyen, Laurent, 2021. "Accelerated degradation tests with inspection effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1099-1114.
    10. Liu, Bin & Wu, Shaomin & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance policy for degrading systems with age- and state-dependent operating cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 879-887.
    11. Ahmed, Umair & Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella, 2021. "An integrated methodological approach for optimising complex systems subjected to predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Huang, Xucong & Peng, Zhaoqin & Tang, Diyin & Chen, Juan & Zio, Enrico & Zheng, Zaiping, 2024. "A physics-informed autoencoder for system health state assessment based on energy-oriented system performance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Blancke, Olivier & Tahan, Antoine & Komljenovic, Dragan & Amyot, Normand & Lévesque, Mélanie & Hudon, Claude, 2018. "A holistic multi-failure mode prognosis approach for complex equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 136-151.
    14. Antonio Pievatolo & Fabrizio Ruggeri & Refik Soyer & Simon Wilson, 2021. "Decisions in Risk and Reliability: An Explanatory Perspective," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Yan, Tao & Lei, Yaguo & Wang, Biao & Han, Tianyu & Si, Xiaosheng & Li, Naipeng, 2020. "Joint maintenance and spare parts inventory optimization for multi-unit systems considering imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Somayyeh Shahraki Dehsoukhteh & Mostafa Razmkhah & Bruno Castanier, 2024. "Optimal block replacement based on expert judgement method," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(3), pages 591-603, June.
    17. Compare, Michele & Bellani, Luca & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Reliability model of a component equipped with PHM capabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 4-11.
    18. Xinlong Li & Yan Ran & Fangming Wan & Hui Yu & Genbao Zhang & Yan He, 2022. "Condition-based maintenance strategy optimization of meta-action unit considering imperfect preventive maintenance based on Wiener process," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 204-233, March.
    19. Zhou, Xiaojun & Wu, Changjie & Li, Yanting & Xi, Lifeng, 2016. "A preventive maintenance model for leased equipment subject to internal degradation and external shock damage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-7.
    20. Insua, David Rios & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & Soyer, Refik & Wilson, Simon, 2020. "Advances in Bayesian decision making in reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 1-18.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:164:y:2017:i:c:p:98-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.