IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v56-57y1998i1p463-481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A progressive figure-based production planning system for a component manufacturer

Author

Listed:
  • Missbauer, H.
  • Zapfel, G.
  • Hauber, W.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Missbauer, H. & Zapfel, G. & Hauber, W., 1998. "A progressive figure-based production planning system for a component manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 463-481, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:56-57:y:1998:i:1:p:463-481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(97)00153-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zapfel, Gunther & Missbauer, Hubert, 1993. "New concepts for production planning and control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 297-320, June.
    2. Zapfel, G. & Missbauer, H., 1993. "Production Planning and Control (PPC) systems including load-oriented order release -- Problems and research perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 107-122, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pürgstaller, Peter & Missbauer, Hubert, 2012. "Rule-based vs. optimisation-based order release in workload control: A simulation study of a MTO manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 670-680.
    2. Julia Pahl & Stefan Voß & David Woodruff, 2007. "Production planning with load dependent lead times: an update of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 297-345, September.
    3. Stefan Haeussler & Philipp Neuner & Matthias Thürer, 2023. "Balancing earliness and tardiness within workload control order release: an assessment by simulation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 487-508, June.
    4. Onay, Anita & Stampfer, Christina & Missbauer, Hubert, 2023. "A behavioral perspective on workload control concepts: The influence of order release on operators’ reaction behavior," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. Missbauer, Hubert, 2009. "Models of the transient behaviour of production units to optimize the aggregate material flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 387-397, April.
    6. Kimms, Alf & Drexl, Andreas, 1996. "Shortcomings of MRP II and a new planning meta-method," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 404, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    7. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Hassoun, Michael, 2020. "On the importance of variability when managing metrology capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 267-276.
    8. Stevenson, Mark & Hendry, Linda C., 2006. "Aggregate load-oriented workload control: A review and a re-classification of a key approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 676-693, December.
    9. Land, Martin & Gaalman, Gerard, 1996. "Workload control concepts in job shops A critical assessment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 535-548, December.
    10. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark & Qu, Ting & Godinho Filho, Moacir, 2014. "The design of simple subcontracting rules for make-to-order shops: An assessment by simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 854-864.
    11. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson, 2016. "Workload control in job shops with re-entrant flows: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 5136-5150, September.
    12. Yang, Feng & Liu, Jingang, 2012. "Simulation-based transfer function modeling for transient analysis of general queueing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 150-166.
    13. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark & Land, Martin J., 2016. "On the integration of input and output control: Workload Control order release," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 43-53.
    14. Hendry, L. & Land, M. & Stevenson, M. & Gaalman, G., 2008. "Investigating implementation issues for workload control (WLC): A comparative case study analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 452-469, March.
    15. repec:dgr:rugsom:95a42 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Zapfel, Gunther, 1996. "Production planning in the case of uncertain individual demand Extension for an MRP II concept," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 153-164, December.
    17. Land, Martin J. & Gaalman, Gerard J. C., 1998. "The performance of workload control concepts in job shops: Improving the release method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 347-364, September.
    18. Missbauer, H., 1997. "Order release and sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 131-143, April.
    19. Kingsman, Brian G., 2000. "Modelling input-output workload control for dynamic capacity planning in production planning systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 73-93, October.
    20. Drexl, A. & Kimms, A., 1997. "Lot sizing and scheduling -- Survey and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 221-235, June.
    21. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson & Ting Qu, 2016. "Job sequencing and selection within workload control order release: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1061-1075, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:56-57:y:1998:i:1:p:463-481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.