IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v229y2020ics0925527320301432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality management theory development via meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Lu
  • Peng, Xianghui
  • Pavur, Robert
  • Prybutok, Victor

Abstract

Quality management (QM) research has frequently focused on investigating the QM system, while a collective consideration of the effects of individual QM practices on organizational performance and performance dimensions remains an under-investigated area of research. The current research provides insights for expanding quality management theory using evidence from a meta-analysis that examines the correlations presented in prior empirical studies. Specifically, this study investigates whether QM practices influence aggregate organizational performance and how individual QM practices influence different performance dimensions. Furthermore, this study investigates whether moderators exist among the relationships between QM and performance. This meta-analysis examined a sample of 28 empirical studies spanning a twenty-year period from 1995 to 2015. The results show that most individual QM practices have a positive impact on aggregate organizational performance and performance dimensions including financial performance, operational performance, customer service, and product quality. The results also reveal that moderators exist among relationships between most pairs of QM practices and performance. In particular, the results suggest a high level of importance is associated with management leadership and supplier quality management compared to other QM practices, as evidenced by their positive relationships with both aggregate organizational performance and the four performance dimensions. In addition, no moderating effects changed the relationships. This research contributes to the QM literature by providing a systematic understanding that addresses more complexity than previous research about the relationships between QM practices and organizational performance. This research also contributes to quality management theory development given the current state of information technology (IT). These findings suggest implications for managers interested in the effect of QM practices on performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Lu & Peng, Xianghui & Pavur, Robert & Prybutok, Victor, 2020. "Quality management theory development via meta-analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320301432
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527320301432
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valmohammadi, Changiz & Roshanzamir, Shervin, 2015. "The guidelines of improvement: Relations among organizational culture, TQM and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 167-178.
    2. Iqbal, Tahir & Huq, Faizul & Bhutta, M. Khurrum S., 2018. "Agile manufacturing relationship building with TQM, JIT, and firm performance: An exploratory study in apparel export industry of Pakistan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 24-37.
    3. Xianghui Peng & Victor Prybutok, 2015. "Relative effectiveness of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award categories," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 629-647, January.
    4. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    5. Sadikoglu, Esin & Zehir, Cemal, 2010. "Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 13-26, September.
    6. Calvo-Mora, Arturo & Ruiz-Moreno, Carolina & Picón-Berjoyo, Araceli & Cauzo-Bottala, Lourdes, 2014. "Mediation effect of TQM technical factors in excellence management systems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 769-774.
    7. Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz & Beltrán-Martín, Inmaculada, 2018. "The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Lo, Chris K.Y. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2018. "Quality management standards, institutionalization and organizational implications: A longitudinal analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 231-239.
    9. Donald Gerwin & Nicholas J. Barrowman, 2002. "An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 938-953, July.
    10. Jing Zeng & Phan Chi Anh & Yoshiki Matsui, 2013. "Shop‐floor communication and process management for quality performance," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(5), pages 454-477, April.
    11. Mellat-Parast, Mahour, 2015. "A longitudinal assessment of the linkages among the Baldrige criteria using independent reviewers’ scores," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 24-34.
    12. Tari, Juan Jose & Molina, Jose Francisco & Castejon, Juan Luis, 2007. "The relationship between quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 483-501, December.
    13. Parast, Mahour Mellat & Golmohammadi, Davood, 2019. "Quality management in healthcare organizations: Empirical evidence from the baldrige data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 133-144.
    14. Zeng, Jing & Anh Phan, Chi & Matsui, Yoshiki, 2015. "The impact of hard and soft quality management on quality and innovation performance: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 216-226.
    15. Xianghui Peng & Victor Prybutok & Heng Xie, 2020. "Integration of supply chain management and quality management within a quality focused organizational framework," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 448-466, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Palash Saha & Subrata Talapatra & H. M. Belal & Victoria Jackson, 2022. "Unleashing the Potential of the TQM and Industry 4.0 to Achieve Sustainability Performance in the Context of a Developing Country," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 495-513, December.
    3. Younès El Manzani & Jean Jack Cegarra, 2023. "The complementary effect of quality management and proactive market orientation on radical product innovation under environmental uncertainty," Post-Print hal-04182964, HAL.
    4. Prim, Alexandre Luis & Freitas, Kenyth Alves de & Paiva, Ely Laureano & Kumar, Maneesh, 2023. "The development of quality capabilities in Brazilian breweries: A Co-evolutionary approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    5. Mihaela Neacșu & Iuliana Eugenia Georgescu, 2023. "Financial Performance - Organizational Sustainability Relationship. Literature Review," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 70(SI), pages 99-120, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haffar, Mohamed & Al-Karaghouli, Wafi & Irani, Zahir & Djebarni, Ramdane & Gbadamosi, Gbolahan, 2019. "The influence of individual readiness for change dimensions on quality management implementation in Algerian manufacturing organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 247-260.
    2. Younès El Manzani & Mostapha El Idrissi & Zakaria Lissaneddine, 2022. "Soft quality management practices and product innovation ambidexterity: the mediating role of market orientation ambidexterity," Post-Print hal-04317941, HAL.
    3. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.
    4. Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz, 2021. "Incremental and radical product innovation capabilities in a quality management context: Exploring the moderating effects of control mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Singh, Vedant & Kumar, Akshay & Singh, Tej, 2018. "Impact of TQM on organisational performance: The case of Indian manufacturing and service industry," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 199-217.
    6. Zeng, Jing & Zhang, Wenqing & Matsui, Yoshiki & Zhao, Xiande, 2017. "The impact of organizational context on hard and soft quality management and innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 240-251.
    7. Ehsan Namdar Joyami & Nour Mohammad Yaghoubi & Seyed AliGholi Rowshan, 2024. "Quality Management and Environmental Management: Role of Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Innovation in Knowledge-Based Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8457-8494, June.
    8. Rana Basu & Prabha Bhola, 2015. "Exploring Quality Management Practices and Its Pattern Analysis in Indian Service SMEs," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 199-235, June.
    9. Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz & Beltrán-Martín, Inmaculada, 2018. "The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Marco Maciel-Monteon & Jorge Limon-Romero & Carlos Gastelum-Acosta & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Diego Tlapa & Manuel Iván Rodríguez Borbón, 2020. "Improvement project in higher education institutions: A BPEP-based model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Jain, Vineet & Raj, Tilak, 2016. "Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 84-96.
    12. Hong, Paul & Doll, William J. & Revilla, Elena & Nahm, Abraham Y., 2011. "Knowledge sharing and strategic fit in integrated product development proejcts: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 186-196, August.
    13. Bourke, Jane & Roper, Stephen, 2017. "Innovation, quality management and learning: Short-term and longer-term effects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1505-1518.
    14. Marina Žižakov & Teodora Vuckovic & Srđan Vulanović & Dušanka Dakić & Milan Delić, 2023. "Investigating the Key Factors Influencing the Process Innovation Capability in Organizations: Evidence from the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Cho, Young Sik & Linderman, Kevin, 2019. "Metacognition-based process improvement practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 132-144.
    16. Bazrkar Ardeshir & Aramoon Erfan & Hajimohammadi Mohammad & Aramoon Vahid, 2022. "Improve Organizational Performance by Implementing the Dimensions of Total Quality Management with Respect to the Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation Capability," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 32(4), pages 38-57, December.
    17. Tamayo-Torres, Javier & Gutierrez-Gutierrez, Leopoldo & Ruiz-Moreno, Antonia, 2014. "The relationship between exploration and exploitation strategies, manufacturing flexibility and organizational learning: An empirical comparison between Non-ISO and ISO certified firms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 72-86.
    18. Fundin, Anders & Bergquist, Bjarne & Eriksson, Henrik & Gremyr, Ida, 2018. "Challenges and propositions for research in quality management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 125-137.
    19. Vishal Singh Patyal & K. Maddulety, 2015. "Interrelationship between Total Quality Management and Six Sigma: A Review," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(6), pages 1025-1060, December.
    20. Dejan Križaj, 2020. "Integration of Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Innovation in Tourism: The QCII Model," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(1), pages 97-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320301432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.