IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v216y2019icp67-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The moderating role of master production scheduling method on throughput in job shop systems

Author

Listed:
  • Mansouri, S. Afshin
  • Golmohammadi, Davood
  • Miller, Jason

Abstract

Accurately predicting throughput is a challenging task for managers of manufacturing companies and analytical models for this purpose have been limited to small and simple production systems. Motivated by a complex and real-world case from the automotive industry, this paper first examines how realistically the throughput of complex job shop systems can be predicted based on problem characteristics and different master production scheduling (MPS) approaches. Next, it investigates how different MPS approaches moderate the relationship between problem characteristics and throughput. To achieve these aims, we develop a mixed-effects model based on operational characteristics and the MPS development method to predict the system's throughput. The analyses are based on data from a real-world case in the automotive industry and two complex job shop systems in the literature. The experimental results indicate that the throughput of job shop systems can be predicted with a high level of accuracy (R2=0.756) based on the problem's characteristics and that the predictive model cross-validates well on a holdout sample. Moreover, we observed that the MPS method can moderate the impact of problem characteristics reflecting complexity, capacity shortages, and setup requirements on throughput, with moderation especially pronounced in the presence of capacity shortages.

Suggested Citation

  • Mansouri, S. Afshin & Golmohammadi, Davood & Miller, Jason, 2019. "The moderating role of master production scheduling method on throughput in job shop systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 67-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:216:y:2019:i:c:p:67-80
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527319301410
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Liming & Yuan, Xue-Ming, 2001. "Throughput, flow times, and service level in an unreliable assembly system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 602-615, December.
    2. Golmohammadi, Davood, 2015. "A study of scheduling under the theory of constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 38-50.
    3. Davood Golmohammadi & S. Afshin Mansouri, 2015. "Complexity and workload considerations in product mix decisions under the theory of constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(5), pages 357-369, August.
    4. Linhares, Alexandre, 2009. "Theory of constraints and the combinatorial complexity of the product-mix decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 121-129, September.
    5. Raed Kontar & Junbo Son & Shiyu Zhou & Chaitanya Sankavaram & Yilu Zhang & Xinyu Du, 2017. "Remaining useful life prediction based on the mixed effects model with mixture prior distribution," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(7), pages 682-697, July.
    6. Batur, Demet & Bekki, Jennifer M. & Chen, Xi, 2018. "Quantile regression metamodeling: Toward improved responsiveness in the high-tech electronics manufacturing industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 212-224.
    7. Arno de Caigny & Kristof Coussement & Koen W. de Bock, 2018. "A new hybrid classification algorithm for customer churn prediction based on logistic regression and decision trees," Post-Print hal-01741661, HAL.
    8. De Caigny, Arno & Coussement, Kristof & De Bock, Koen W., 2018. "A new hybrid classification algorithm for customer churn prediction based on logistic regression and decision trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 760-772.
    9. Young-Seon Jeong & Myong K. Jeong & Jye-Chyi Lu & Ming Yuan & Jionghua (Judy) Jin, 2018. "Statistical process control procedures for functional data with systematic local variations," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 448-462, May.
    10. Plenert, Gerhard, 1993. "Optimizing theory of constraints when multiple constrained resources exist," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 126-133, October.
    11. Kenneth R. Baker & Stephen G. Powell & David F. Pyke, 1993. "Optimal Allocation of Work in Assembly Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 101-106, January.
    12. Baker, Kenneth R. & Powell, Stephen G., 1995. "A predictive model for the throughput of simple assembly systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 336-345, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus & Antunes Junior, José Antonio Valle & de Matos, Celso Augusto, 2021. "The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Chou, Ping & Chuang, Howard Hao-Chun & Chou, Yen-Chun & Liang, Ting-Peng, 2022. "Predictive analytics for customer repurchase: Interdisciplinary integration of buy till you die modeling and machine learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 635-651.
    3. Koen W. de Bock & Arno de Caigny, 2021. "Spline-rule ensemble classifiers with structured sparsity regularization for interpretable customer churn modeling," Post-Print hal-03391564, HAL.
    4. Louis Geiler & Séverine Affeldt & Mohamed Nadif, 2022. "A survey on machine learning methods for churn prediction," Post-Print hal-03824873, HAL.
    5. Stevens, Alexander & De Smedt, Johannes, 2024. "Explainability in process outcome prediction: Guidelines to obtain interpretable and faithful models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 317-329.
    6. Arno de Caigny & Kristof Coussement & Koen W. de Bock & Stefan Lessmann, 2019. "Incorporating textual information in customer churn prediction models based on a convolutional neural network," Post-Print hal-02275958, HAL.
    7. Matthias Bogaert & Lex Delaere, 2023. "Ensemble Methods in Customer Churn Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of the State-of-the-Art," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, February.
    8. De Caigny, Arno & Coussement, Kristof & De Bock, Koen W. & Lessmann, Stefan, 2020. "Incorporating textual information in customer churn prediction models based on a convolutional neural network," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1563-1578.
    9. Yuan, Kunpeng & Chi, Guotai & Zhou, Ying & Yin, Hailei, 2022. "A novel two-stage hybrid default prediction model with k-means clustering and support vector domain description," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    10. Golmohammadi, Davood, 2015. "A study of scheduling under the theory of constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 38-50.
    11. Youngkeun Choi & Jae W. Choi, 2023. "Assessing the Predictive Performance of Machine Learning in Direct Marketing Response," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Arno de Caigny & Kristof Coussement & Koen de Bock, 2020. "Leveraging fine-grained transaction data for customer life event predictions," Post-Print hal-02507998, HAL.
    13. Liu, Zhenkun & Zhang, Ying & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Wang, Jianzhou & Yang, Hufang & Gao, Yuyang & Chen, Yinghao, 2024. "Profit-driven fusion framework based on bagging and boosting classifiers for potential purchaser prediction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Chen, Yan & Zhang, Lei & Zhao, Yulu & Xu, Bing, 2022. "Implementation of penalized survival models in churn prediction of vehicle insurance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 162-171.
    15. Dumitrescu, Elena & Hué, Sullivan & Hurlin, Christophe & Tokpavi, Sessi, 2022. "Machine learning for credit scoring: Improving logistic regression with non-linear decision-tree effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1178-1192.
    16. Sobrie, Léon & Verschelde, Marijn & Roets, Bart, 2024. "Explainable real-time predictive analytics on employee workload in digital railway control rooms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 437-448.
    17. Amit Neil Ramkissoon & Wayne Goodridge, 2022. "Enhancing the Predictive Performance of Credibility-Based Fake News Detection Using Ensemble Learning," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 259-289, October.
    18. Li, Mengyu & Vanberkel, Peter & Zhong, Xiang, 2022. "Predicting ambulance offload delay using a hybrid decision tree model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    19. Narendra Singh & Pushpa Singh & Mukul Gupta, 2020. "An inclusive survey on machine learning for CRM: a paradigm shift," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(4), pages 447-457, December.
    20. Petra P. Šimović & Claire Y. T. Chen & Edward W. Sun, 2023. "Classifying the Variety of Customers’ Online Engagement for Churn Prediction with a Mixed-Penalty Logistic Regression," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 451-485, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:216:y:2019:i:c:p:67-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.