IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v141y2013i1p366-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Order acceptance and scheduling in a two-machine flowshop

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Xiuli
  • Xie, Xingzi
  • Cheng, T.C.E.

Abstract

We study the order acceptance and scheduling problem in a two-machine flowshop. The firm receives a pool of orders before a planning period, each of which is characterized by revenue, processing times on machines 1 and 2, a due date, and a tardiness penalty. The firm seeks to decide on the orders to accept and schedule the accepted orders so as to maximize the total net revenue. We formulate the problem as mixed-integer linear programming models, and develop a heuristic and a branch-and-bound (B&B) algorithm based on some derived dominance rules and relaxation techniques. We assess the performance of the B&B algorithm and the heuristic via computational experiments. The computational results show that the B&B algorithm can solve problem instances with up to 20 jobs within a reasonable time while the heuristic is efficient in approximately solving large instances of the problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Xiuli & Xie, Xingzi & Cheng, T.C.E., 2013. "Order acceptance and scheduling in a two-machine flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 366-376.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:141:y:2013:i:1:p:366-376
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527312003684
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    2. Louis-Philippe Bigras & Michel Gamache & Gilles Savard, 2008. "Time-Indexed Formulations and the Total Weighted Tardiness Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 133-142, February.
    3. Chris N. Potts & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 1985. "A Branch and Bound Algorithm for the Total Weighted Tardiness Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 363-377, April.
    4. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xiuli & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "A heuristic for scheduling jobs on two identical parallel machines with a machine availability constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 74-82.
    2. Carvalho, Andréa Nunes & Oliveira, Fabricio & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2016. "Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: A robust optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 158-171.
    3. Li, Xin & Ventura, Jose A., 2020. "Exact algorithms for a joint order acceptance and scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Hanane Krim & Nicolas Zufferey & Jean-Yves Potvin & Rachid Benmansour & David Duvivier, 2022. "Tabu search for a parallel-machine scheduling problem with periodic maintenance, job rejection and weighted sum of completion times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 89-105, February.
    5. Carvalho, Andréa Nunes & Oliveira, Fabricio & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2015. "Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 187-203.
    6. Chen, Wenchong & Gong, Xuejian & Rahman, Humyun Fuad & Liu, Hongwei & Qi, Ershi, 2021. "Real-time order acceptance and scheduling for data-enabled permutation flow shops: Bilevel interactive optimization with nonlinear integer programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Brachmann, Robert & Kolisch, Rainer, 2021. "The impact of flexibility on engineer-to-order production planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Wang, Xiuli & Zhu, Qianqian & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "Subcontracting price schemes for order acceptance and scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Shih-Hsin Chen & Yeong-Cheng Liou & Yi-Hui Chen & Kun-Ching Wang, 2019. "Order Acceptance and Scheduling Problem with Carbon Emission Reduction and Electricity Tariffs on a Single Machine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Lei, Deming & Guo, Xiuping, 2015. "A parallel neighborhood search for order acceptance and scheduling in flow shop environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 12-18.
    11. Esmaeilbeigi, Rasul & Charkhgard, Parisa & Charkhgard, Hadi, 2016. "Order acceptance and scheduling problems in two-machine flow shops: New mixed integer programming formulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 419-431.
    12. Xiao, Yiyong & Yuan, Yingying & Zhang, Ren-Qian & Konak, Abdullah, 2015. "Non-permutation flow shop scheduling with order acceptance and weighted tardiness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 270(C), pages 312-333.
    13. Naderi, Bahman & Roshanaei, Vahid, 2020. "Branch-Relax-and-Check: A tractable decomposition method for order acceptance and identical parallel machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 811-827.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Thevenin & Nicolas Zufferey & Marino Widmer, 2016. "Order acceptance and scheduling with earliness and tardiness penalties," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 849-890, December.
    2. Wang, Xiuli & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "A heuristic for scheduling jobs on two identical parallel machines with a machine availability constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 74-82.
    3. Wang, Xiuli & Zhu, Qianqian & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "Subcontracting price schemes for order acceptance and scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Zhong, Xueling & Ou, Jinwen & Wang, Guoqing, 2014. "Order acceptance and scheduling with machine availability constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 435-441.
    5. Tarhan, İstenç & Oğuz, Ceyda, 2022. "A matheuristic for the generalized order acceptance and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 87-103.
    6. Xin Li & José A. Ventura & Kevin A. Bunn, 2021. "A joint order acceptance and scheduling problem with earliness and tardiness penalties considering overtime," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-68, February.
    7. Li, Xin & Ventura, Jose A., 2020. "Exact algorithms for a joint order acceptance and scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    8. Lei He & Mathijs Weerdt & Neil Yorke-Smith, 2020. "Time/sequence-dependent scheduling: the design and evaluation of a general purpose tabu-based adaptive large neighbourhood search algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1051-1078, April.
    9. Perea, Federico & Yepes-Borrero, Juan C. & Menezes, Mozart B.C., 2023. "Acceptance Ordering Scheduling Problem: The impact of an order-portfolio on a make-to-order firm’s profitability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Hanane Krim & Nicolas Zufferey & Jean-Yves Potvin & Rachid Benmansour & David Duvivier, 2022. "Tabu search for a parallel-machine scheduling problem with periodic maintenance, job rejection and weighted sum of completion times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 89-105, February.
    11. Xiao, Yiyong & Yuan, Yingying & Zhang, Ren-Qian & Konak, Abdullah, 2015. "Non-permutation flow shop scheduling with order acceptance and weighted tardiness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 270(C), pages 312-333.
    12. Wang, Xiuli & Geng, Sujie & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Negotiation mechanisms for an order subcontracting and scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 154-167.
    13. Ou, Jinwen & Zhong, Xueling & Wang, Guoqing, 2015. "An improved heuristic for parallel machine scheduling with rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 653-661.
    14. Jinwen Ou & Xueling Zhong, 2017. "Order acceptance and scheduling with consideration of service level," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 429-447, January.
    15. Natashia Boland & Riley Clement & Hamish Waterer, 2016. "A Bucket Indexed Formulation for Nonpreemptive Single Machine Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 14-30, February.
    16. Lei, Deming & Guo, Xiuping, 2015. "A parallel neighborhood search for order acceptance and scheduling in flow shop environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 12-18.
    17. Esmaeilbeigi, Rasul & Charkhgard, Parisa & Charkhgard, Hadi, 2016. "Order acceptance and scheduling problems in two-machine flow shops: New mixed integer programming formulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 419-431.
    18. Somaye Geramipour & Ghasem Moslehi & Mohammad Reisi-Nafchi, 2017. "Maximizing the profit in customer’s order acceptance and scheduling problem with weighted tardiness penalty," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(1), pages 89-101, January.
    19. Simon Thevenin & Nicolas Zufferey & Rémy Glardon, 2017. "Model and metaheuristics for a scheduling problem integrating procurement, sale and distribution decisions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 437-460, December.
    20. de Weerdt, Mathijs & Baart, Robert & He, Lei, 2021. "Single-machine scheduling with release times, deadlines, setup times, and rejection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 629-639.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:141:y:2013:i:1:p:366-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.