IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joheur/v22y2016i6d10.1007_s10732-016-9321-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Order acceptance and scheduling with earliness and tardiness penalties

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Thevenin

    (University of Geneva)

  • Nicolas Zufferey

    (University of Geneva)

  • Marino Widmer

    (University of Fribourg)

Abstract

This paper addresses a production scheduling problem in a single-machine environment, where a job can be either early, on time, late, or rejected. In order acceptance and scheduling contexts, it is assumed that the production capacity of a company is overloaded. The problem is therefore to decide which orders to accept and how to sequence their production. In contrast with the existing literature, the considered problem jointly takes into account the following features: earliness and tardiness penalties (which can be linear or quadratic), sequence-dependent setup times and costs, rejection penalties, and the possibility of having idle times. The practical relevance of this new NP-hard problem is discussed and various solution methods are proposed, ranging from a basic greedy algorithm to refined metaheuristics (e.g., tabu search, the adaptive memory algorithm, population-based approaches loosely inspired on ant algorithms). The methods are compared for instances with various structures containing up to 200 jobs. For small linear instances, the metaheuristics are favorably compared with an exact formulation using CPLEX 12.2. Managerial insights and recommendations are finally given.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Thevenin & Nicolas Zufferey & Marino Widmer, 2016. "Order acceptance and scheduling with earliness and tardiness penalties," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 849-890, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:22:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10732-016-9321-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10732-016-9321-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10732-016-9321-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10732-016-9321-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ten Kate, Hans A., 1994. "Towards a better understanding of order acceptance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 139-152, November.
    2. Dvir Shabtay & Nufar Gaspar & Liron Yedidsion, 2012. "A bicriteria approach to scheduling a single machine with job rejection and positional penalties," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 395-424, May.
    3. M Plumettaz & D Schindl & N Zufferey, 2010. "Ant Local Search and its efficient adaptation to graph colouring," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(5), pages 819-826, May.
    4. Chris N. Potts & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 1985. "A Branch and Bound Algorithm for the Total Weighted Tardiness Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 363-377, April.
    5. Wan, Guohua & Yen, Benjamin P. -C., 2002. "Tabu search for single machine scheduling with distinct due windows and weighted earliness/tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 271-281, October.
    6. Mazzini, Renata & Armentano, Vinicius A., 2001. "A heuristic for single machine scheduling with early and tardy costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 129-146, January.
    7. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    8. Afshin Mansouri, S. & Gallear, David & Askariazad, Mohammad H., 2012. "Decision support for build-to-order supply chain management through multiobjective optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 24-36.
    9. Michael R. Garey & Robert E. Tarjan & Gordon T. Wilfong, 1988. "One-Processor Scheduling with Symmetric Earliness and Tardiness Penalties," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 330-348, May.
    10. Kenneth R. Baker & Gary D. Scudder, 1990. "Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 22-36, February.
    11. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Zorzini, M. & Corti, D. & Pozzetti, A., 2008. "Due date (DD) quotation and capacity planning in make-to-order companies: Results from an empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 919-933, April.
    13. Martello, Silvano & Pisinger, David & Toth, Paolo, 2000. "New trends in exact algorithms for the 0-1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 325-332, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamadreza Dabiri & Mehdi Yazdani & Bahman Naderi & Hassan Haleh, 2022. "Modeling and solution methods for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with job rejection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2721-2765, July.
    2. Li, Xin & Ventura, Jose A., 2020. "Exact algorithms for a joint order acceptance and scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Hanane Krim & Nicolas Zufferey & Jean-Yves Potvin & Rachid Benmansour & David Duvivier, 2022. "Tabu search for a parallel-machine scheduling problem with periodic maintenance, job rejection and weighted sum of completion times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 89-105, February.
    4. Naderi, Bahman & Roshanaei, Vahid, 2020. "Branch-Relax-and-Check: A tractable decomposition method for order acceptance and identical parallel machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 811-827.
    5. Joonyup Eun & Chang Sup Sung & Eun-Seok Kim, 2017. "Maximizing total job value on a single machine with job selection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(9), pages 998-1005, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wan, Guohua & Yen, Benjamin P.-C., 2009. "Single machine scheduling to minimize total weighted earliness subject to minimal number of tardy jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 89-97, May.
    2. Wang, Xiuli & Xie, Xingzi & Cheng, T.C.E., 2013. "Order acceptance and scheduling in a two-machine flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 366-376.
    3. Hanane Krim & Nicolas Zufferey & Jean-Yves Potvin & Rachid Benmansour & David Duvivier, 2022. "Tabu search for a parallel-machine scheduling problem with periodic maintenance, job rejection and weighted sum of completion times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 89-105, February.
    4. Arthur Kramer & Anand Subramanian, 2019. "A unified heuristic and an annotated bibliography for a large class of earliness–tardiness scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 21-57, February.
    5. Hoogeveen, Han, 2005. "Multicriteria scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 592-623, December.
    6. Ivo Blöchliger & Nicolas Zufferey, 2013. "Multi-coloring and job-scheduling with assignment and incompatibility costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 83-101, December.
    7. Xin Li & José A. Ventura & Kevin A. Bunn, 2021. "A joint order acceptance and scheduling problem with earliness and tardiness penalties considering overtime," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-68, February.
    8. Y Li & A Lim & B Rodrigues, 2004. "Crossdocking—JIT scheduling with time windows," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1342-1351, December.
    9. G A Álvarez-Pérez & J L González-Velarde & J W Fowler, 2009. "Crossdocking— Just in Time scheduling: an alternative solution approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(4), pages 554-564, April.
    10. Esteve, B. & Aubijoux, C. & Chartier, A. & T'kindt, V., 2006. "A recovering beam search algorithm for the single machine Just-in-Time scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(3), pages 798-813, August.
    11. Wang, Xiuli & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "A heuristic for scheduling jobs on two identical parallel machines with a machine availability constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 74-82.
    12. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    13. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    14. Kolahan, F. & Liang, M., 1998. "An adaptive TS approach to JIT sequencing with variable processing times and sequence-dependent setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 142-159, August.
    15. Ou, Jinwen & Zhong, Xueling, 2017. "Bicriteria order acceptance and scheduling with consideration of fill rate," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 904-907.
    16. J M S Valente & R A F S Alves, 2005. "Improved lower bounds for the early/tardy scheduling problem with no idle time," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(5), pages 604-612, May.
    17. Mosheiov, Gur & Shadmon, Michal, 2001. "Minmax earliness-tardiness costs with unit processing time jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 638-652, May.
    18. Sourd, Francis, 2005. "Punctuality and idleness in just-in-time scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 739-751, December.
    19. Zhi-Long Chen, 1997. "Scheduling with batch setup times and earliness-tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 518-537, February.
    20. Perea, Federico & Yepes-Borrero, Juan C. & Menezes, Mozart B.C., 2023. "Acceptance Ordering Scheduling Problem: The impact of an order-portfolio on a make-to-order firm’s profitability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:22:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10732-016-9321-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.