IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v134y2011i1p67-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial and operational decisions in the electricity sector: Contract portfolio optimization with the conditional value-at-risk criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Yau, Sheena
  • Kwon, Roy H.
  • Scott Rogers, J.
  • Wu, Desheng

Abstract

The restructuring of electricity markets around the world have caused increased volatility and uncertainty of the price power. As a result, providers of power now face increased uncertainty and risk in the operational and financial decisions related to procurement. Providers must seek optimal ways to deliver the required volume of power to retailers and end users while managing risk. We consider a mixed-integer programming model for a power providing agent that jointly considers the problem of selecting custom electricity contracts and finding the optimal procurement strategy of meeting contract obligations under spot price uncertainty. A two-stage stochastic integer programming (SIP) model with a conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) constraint to incorporate risk aversion is developed. Computational results are presented that demonstrates the CVaR approach and the results are compared with a corresponding expected cost minimization approach. The SIP model with CVaR will allow acceptance of contracts at lower prices compared to an approach based on a corresponding risk-neutral model as a hedge against uncertainty and mis-specified arbitrage.

Suggested Citation

  • Yau, Sheena & Kwon, Roy H. & Scott Rogers, J. & Wu, Desheng, 2011. "Financial and operational decisions in the electricity sector: Contract portfolio optimization with the conditional value-at-risk criterion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 67-77, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:134:y:2011:i:1:p:67-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527310004007
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thompson, Andrew C., 1995. "Valuation of Path-Dependent Contingent Claims with Multiple Exercise Decisions over Time: The Case of Take-or-Pay," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 271-293, June.
    2. Suvrajeet Sen & Lihua Yu & Talat Genc, 2006. "A Stochastic Programming Approach to Power Portfolio Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 55-72, February.
    3. John A. Muckstadt & Sherri A. Koenig, 1977. "An Application of Lagrangian Relaxation to Scheduling in Power-Generation Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 387-403, June.
    4. John R. Birge, 2000. "Option Methods for Incorporating Risk into Linear Capacity Planning Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 19-31, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Somayeh Moazeni & Thomas F. Coleman & Yuying Li, 2016. "Smoothing and parametric rules for stochastic mean-CVaR optimal execution strategy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 99-120, February.
    2. Lynch & John Curtis, 2016. "The effects of wind generation capacity on electricity prices and generation costs: a Monte Carlo analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 133-151, January.
    3. Lin, Edward M.H. & Sun, Edward W. & Yu, Min-Teh, 2020. "Behavioral data-driven analysis with Bayesian method for risk management of financial services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Soleimani, Hamed & Govindan, Kannan, 2014. "Reverse logistics network design and planning utilizing conditional value at risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 487-497.
    5. Somayeh Moazeni & Thomas Coleman & Yuying Li, 2016. "Smoothing and parametric rules for stochastic mean-CVaR optimal execution strategy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 99-120, February.
    6. Ethem Çanakoğlu & Esra Adıyeke, 2020. "Comparison of Electricity Spot Price Modelling and Risk Management Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Yucekaya, A., 2022. "Electricity trading for coal-fired power plants in Turkish power market considering uncertainty in spot, derivatives and bilateral contract market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Wei, Yi-Ming & Mi, Zhi-Fu & Huang, Zhimin, 2015. "Climate policy modeling: An online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 70-84.
    9. Tamar Gadrich & Emil Bashkansky & Ričardas Zitikis, 2015. "Assessing variation: a unifying approach for all scales of measurement," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1145-1167, May.
    10. Tasuku Soma & Yuichi Yoshida, 2023. "Online risk-averse submodular maximization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 393-414, January.
    11. Lu, Jie & Gupte, Akshay & Huang, Yongxi, 2018. "A mean-risk mixed integer nonlinear program for transportation network protection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 277-289.
    12. Alexandru V. Asimit & Raluca Vernic & Ricardas Zitikis, 2016. "Background Risk Models and Stepwise Portfolio Construction," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 805-827, September.
    13. Jose Arreola Hernandez & Sang Hoon Kang & Seong‐Min Yoon, 2022. "Nonlinear spillover and portfolio allocation characteristics of energy equity sectors: Evidence from the United States and Canada," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Mohsen Zamani & Mahdi Abolghasemi & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Hosseini & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2019. "Considering pricing and uncertainty in designing a reverse logistics network," Papers 1909.11633, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raimund M. Kovacevic, 2019. "Valuation and pricing of electricity delivery contracts: the producer’s view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 421-460, April.
    2. Roy H. Kwon & J. Scott Rogers & Sheena Yau, 2006. "Stochastic programming models for replication of electricity forward contracts for industry," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(7), pages 713-726, October.
    3. Dong, Wenfeng & Kang, Boda, 2019. "Analysis of a multiple year gas sales agreement with make-up, carry-forward and indexation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 76-96.
    4. E. Nasakkala & J. Keppo, 2008. "Hydropower with Financial Information," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5-6), pages 503-529.
    5. Soren Christensen & Albrecht Irle & Stephan Jurgens, 2012. "Optimal multiple stopping with random waiting times," Papers 1205.1966, arXiv.org.
    6. Alain Bensoussan & Benoit Chevalier-Roignant & Alejandro Rivera, 2022. "A model for wind farm management with option interactions," Post-Print hal-04325553, HAL.
    7. Qin, Ruwen & Nembhard, David A., 2012. "Demand modeling of stochastic product diffusion over the life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 201-210.
    8. Vishal Gaur & Sridhar Seshadri, 2005. "Hedging Inventory Risk Through Market Instruments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 103-120, April.
    9. Jinyeong Lee & Kyungcheol Shin & Young-Min Wi, 2024. "Decentralized Operations of Industrial Complex Microgrids Considering Corporate Power Purchase Agreements for Renewable Energy 100% Initiatives in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    11. John R. Birge, 2015. "OM Forum—Operations and Finance Interactions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 4-15, February.
    12. Nicola Secomandi & Sunder Kekre, 2014. "Optimal Energy Procurement in Spot and Forward Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 270-282, May.
    13. Liu, Xiaoran & Ronn, Ehud I., 2020. "Using the binomial model for the valuation of real options in computing optimal subsidies for Chinese renewable energy investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Andreas Dietrich & Christian Furtwängler & Christoph Weber, "undated". "Thesenpapier: Managing combined power and heat portfolios in sequential spot power markets under uncertainty," EWL Working Papers 2003, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics.
    15. Sergio Chayet & Wallace J. Hopp, 2008. "Risk‐sensitive sizing of responsive facilities," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 218-233, April.
    16. M. Dahlgren, 2005. "A Continuous Time Model to Price Commodity-Based Swing Options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 27-47, June.
    17. Pflug, Georg C. & Broussev, Nikola, 2009. "Electricity swing options: Behavioral models and pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 1041-1050, September.
    18. Ni, Jian & Chu, Lap-Keung & Yen, Benjamin P.C., 2016. "Coordinating operational policy with financial hedging for risk-averse firms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 279-289.
    19. Kettunen, Janne & Bunn, Derek W., 2016. "Risk induced resource dependency in capacity investments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 914-924.
    20. Deng, S.J. & Oren, S.S., 2006. "Electricity derivatives and risk management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 940-953.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:134:y:2011:i:1:p:67-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.