IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v130y2011i2p230-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group scheduling and due date assignment on a single machine

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Shisheng
  • Ng, C.T.
  • Yuan, Jinjiang

Abstract

We consider a single-machine scheduling problem involving both the due date assignment and job scheduling under a group technology environment. The jobs (orders) of customers are classified into groups according to their production similarities in advance. To achieve production efficiency and save time/money resource, all jobs of the same group are required to be processed contiguously on the machine. A sequence-independent setup time precedes the processing of each group. The due dates are assignable according to one of the following three due date assignment methods: FML-CON, FML-SLK and DIF, where FML-CON means that all jobs within the same group are assigned a common due date, FML-SLK means that all jobs within the same group are assigned an equal flow allowance, and DIF means that each job can be assigned a different due date with no restrictions. The goal is to determine an optimal combination of the due date assignment strategy and job schedule so as to minimize an objective function that includes earliness, tardiness, due date assignment and flow time costs. An time unified optimization algorithm is provided for all of the above three due date assignment methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Shisheng & Ng, C.T. & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2011. "Group scheduling and due date assignment on a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 230-235, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:130:y:2011:i:2:p:230-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(10)00492-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Logendran, Rasaratnam & Carson, Sara & Hanson, Erik, 2005. "Group scheduling in flexible flow shops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 143-155, May.
    2. Kenneth R. Baker & Gary D. Scudder, 1990. "Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 22-36, February.
    3. Leyvand, Yaron & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2010. "A unified approach for scheduling with convex resource consumption functions using positional penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 301-312, October.
    4. Moslehi, G. & Mirzaee, M. & Vasei, M. & Modarres, M. & Azaron, A., 2009. "Two-machine flow shop scheduling to minimize the sum of maximum earliness and tardiness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 763-773, December.
    5. C. Ng & T. Cheng & Adam Janiak & Mikhail Kovalyov, 2005. "Group Scheduling with Controllable Setup and Processing Times: Minimizing Total Weighted Completion Time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 163-174, January.
    6. Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Beheshti-Nia, Mohammad Ali, 2009. "Hybrid flow shop scheduling with parallel batching," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 185-196, January.
    7. Chang, Pei-Chann & Chen, Shih-Hsin & Mani, V., 2009. "A note on due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with a learning/aging effect," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 142-149, January.
    8. Azaron, Amir & Fynes, Brian & Modarres, Mohammad, 2011. "Due date assignment in repetitive projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 79-85, January.
    9. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    10. S. S. Panwalkar & M. L. Smith & A. Seidmann, 1982. "Common Due Date Assignment to Minimize Total Penalty for the One Machine Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 391-399, April.
    11. Shabtay, Dvir, 2010. "Scheduling and due date assignment to minimize earliness, tardiness, holding, due date assignment and batch delivery costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 235-242, January.
    12. Cheng, T. C. E. & Gupta, M. C., 1989. "Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 156-166, January.
    13. Allahverdi, Ali & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2008. "A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 985-1032, June.
    14. Potts, Chris N. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2000. "Scheduling with batching: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 228-249, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allahverdi, Ali, 2015. "The third comprehensive survey on scheduling problems with setup times/costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 345-378.
    2. Ying Chen & Xiaole Ma & Guiqing Zhang & Yongxi Cheng, 2023. "On optimal due date assignment without restriction and resource allocation in group technology scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Shabtay, Dvir, 2016. "Optimal restricted due date assignment in scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 79-89.
    4. Su, Ling-Huey & Tien, Yi-Yu, 2011. "Minimizing mean absolute deviation of completion time about a common due window subject to maximum tardiness for a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 196-203, November.
    5. Min Ji & Xin Zhang & Xiaoying Tang & T.C.E. Cheng & Guiyi Wei & Yuanyuan Tan, 2016. "Group scheduling with group-dependent multiple due windows assignment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1244-1256, February.
    6. Hongyu He & Yanzhi Zhao & Xiaojun Ma & Zheng-Guo Lv & Ji-Bo Wang, 2023. "Branch-and-Bound and Heuristic Algorithms for Group Scheduling with Due-Date Assignment and Resource Allocation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Xingong, Zhang & Yong, Wang, 2015. "Single-machine scheduling CON/SLK due window assignment problems with sum-of-processed times based learning effect," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 628-635.
    8. Li, Gang & Wang, Xiao-Yuan & Wang, Ji-Bo & Sun, Lin-Yan, 2013. "Worst case analysis of flow shop scheduling problems with a time-dependent learning effect," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 98-104.
    9. Ming-Hui Li & Dan-Yang Lv & Yuan-Yuan Lu & Ji-Bo Wang, 2024. "Scheduling with Group Technology, Resource Allocation, and Learning Effect Simultaneously," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Min Ji & Sai Liu & Xiaolin Zhang & Keke Cao & T. C. E. Cheng, 2017. "Sequencing Games with Slack Due Windows and Group Technology Considerations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(2), pages 121-133, February.
    11. Li, Shisheng & Ng, C.T. & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2011. "Scheduling deteriorating jobs with CON/SLK due date assignment on a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 747-751, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Ji & Xin Zhang & Xiaoying Tang & T.C.E. Cheng & Guiyi Wei & Yuanyuan Tan, 2016. "Group scheduling with group-dependent multiple due windows assignment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1244-1256, February.
    2. Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George & Zhang, Rui, 2016. "Optimal coordination of resource allocation, due date assignment and scheduling decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 41-54.
    3. Qian, Jianbo & Steiner, George, 2013. "Fast algorithms for scheduling with learning effects and time-dependent processing times on a single machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 547-551.
    4. Lin, Shih-Wei & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2007. "A sequential exchange approach for minimizing earliness-tardiness penalties of single-machine scheduling with a common due date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1294-1301, March.
    5. Sang, Yao-Wen & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Sterna, Małgorzata & Błażewicz, Jacek, 2023. "Single machine scheduling with due date assignment to minimize the total weighted lead time penalty and late work," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Janiak, Adam & Janiak, Władysław A. & Krysiak, Tomasz & Kwiatkowski, Tomasz, 2015. "A survey on scheduling problems with due windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 347-357.
    7. Shabtay, Dvir, 2010. "Scheduling and due date assignment to minimize earliness, tardiness, holding, due date assignment and batch delivery costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 235-242, January.
    8. Prabuddha De & Jay B. Ghosh & Charles E. Wells, 1994. "Due‐date assignment and early/tardy scheduling on identical parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 17-32, February.
    9. Du-Juan Wang & Yunqiang Yin & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & T.C.E. Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu, 2016. "Due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two competing agents," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1152-1169, February.
    10. T C E Cheng & L Kang & C T Ng, 2004. "Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 198-203, February.
    11. Enrique Gerstl & Gur Mosheiov, 2013. "Minmax due-date assignment with a time window for acceptable lead-times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 167-177, December.
    12. Leyvand, Yaron & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2010. "A unified approach for scheduling with convex resource consumption functions using positional penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 301-312, October.
    13. Bernard Dickman & Yonah Wilamowsky & Sheldon Epstein, 2001. "Multiple common due dates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(4), pages 293-298, June.
    14. Zhi-Long Chen, 1997. "Scheduling with batch setup times and earliness-tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 518-537, February.
    15. Chen, Zhi-Long, 1996. "Scheduling and common due date assignment with earliness-tardiness penalties and batch delivery costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 49-60, August.
    16. Vinod, V. & Sridharan, R., 2011. "Simulation modeling and analysis of due-date assignment methods and scheduling decision rules in a dynamic job shop production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 127-146, January.
    17. Hino, Celso M. & Ronconi, Debora P. & Mendes, Andre B., 2005. "Minimizing earliness and tardiness penalties in a single-machine problem with a common due date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(1), pages 190-201, January.
    18. Dvir Shabtay & George Steiner, 2008. "The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 25-40, March.
    19. Andreas C. Nearchou & Sotiris L. Omirou, 2024. "Self-Adaptive Biased Differential Evolution for Scheduling Against Common Due Dates," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-29, June.
    20. T. C. E. Cheng & H. G. Kahlbacher, 1991. "A proof for the longest‐job‐first policy in one‐machine scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 715-720, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:130:y:2011:i:2:p:230-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.