IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v494y2018icp186-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness analysis of complex networks with power decentralization strategy via flow-sensitive centrality against cascading failures

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Wenzhang
  • Wang, Hao
  • Wu, Zhengping

Abstract

Most existing cascading failure mitigation strategy of power grids based on complex network ignores the impact of electrical characteristics on dynamic performance. In this paper, the robustness of the power grid under a power decentralization strategy is analysed through cascading failure simulation based on AC flow theory. The flow-sensitive (FS) centrality is introduced by integrating topological features and electrical properties to help determine the siting of the generation nodes. The simulation results of the IEEE-bus systems show that the flow-sensitive centrality method is a more stable and accurate approach and can enhance the robustness of the network remarkably. Through the study of the optimal flow-sensitive centrality selection for different networks, we find that the robustness of the network with obvious small-world effect depends more on contribution of the generation nodes detected by community structure, otherwise, contribution of the generation nodes with important influence on power flow is more critical. In addition, community structure plays a significant role in balancing the power flow distribution and further slowing the propagation of failures. These results are useful in power grid planning and cascading failure prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Wenzhang & Wang, Hao & Wu, Zhengping, 2018. "Robustness analysis of complex networks with power decentralization strategy via flow-sensitive centrality against cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 494(C), pages 186-199.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:494:y:2018:i:c:p:186-199
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437117312451
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren, Hai-Peng & Song, Jihong & Yang, Rong & Baptista, Murilo S. & Grebogi, Celso, 2016. "Cascade failure analysis of power grid using new load distribution law and node removal rule," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 239-251.
    2. R. Kinney & P. Crucitti & R. Albert & V. Latora, 2005. "Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 101-107, July.
    3. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo, 2004. "A topological analysis of the Italian electric power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 338(1), pages 92-97.
    4. Saniee Monfared, Momhammad Ali & Jalili, Mahdi & Alipour, Zohreh, 2014. "Topology and vulnerability of the Iranian power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 406(C), pages 24-33.
    5. Dai, YuanYu & Chen, Guo & Dong, ZhaoYang & Xue, YuSheng & Hill, David J. & Zhao, Yuan, 2014. "An improved framework for power grid vulnerability analysis considering critical system features," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 395(C), pages 405-415.
    6. Prakash, Prem & Khatod, Dheeraj K., 2016. "Optimal sizing and siting techniques for distributed generation in distribution systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 111-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Di Zhang & Limin Jia & Jin Ning & Yujiang Ye & Hao Sun & Ruifeng Shi, 2023. "Power Grid Structure Performance Evaluation Based on Complex Network Cascade Failure Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Salcedo-Sanz, S. & Cuadra, L., 2019. "Quasi scale-free geographically embedded networks over DLA-generated aggregates," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1286-1305.
    3. Wang, Shuliang & Zhang, Jianhua & Yue, Xin, 2018. "Multiple robustness assessment method for understanding structural and functional characteristics of the power network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 261-270.
    4. Ma, Xiangyu & Zhou, Huijie & Li, Zhiyi, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A complex network perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Shen, Yi & Song, Guohao & Xu, Huangliang & Xie, Yuancheng, 2020. "Model of node traffic recovery behavior and cascading congestion analysis in networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Hengdao & Zheng, Ciyan & Iu, Herbert Ho-Ching & Fernando, Tyrone, 2017. "A critical review of cascading failure analysis and modeling of power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 9-22.
    2. Fan, Wenli & Huang, Shaowei & Mei, Shengwei, 2016. "Invulnerability of power grids based on maximum flow theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 977-985.
    3. Xue, Fei & Bompard, Ettore & Huang, Tao & Jiang, Lin & Lu, Shaofeng & Zhu, Huaiying, 2017. "Interrelation of structure and operational states in cascading failure of overloading lines in power grids," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 728-740.
    4. Wang, Zhuoyang & Chen, Guo & Hill, David J. & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2016. "A power flow based model for the analysis of vulnerability in power networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 460(C), pages 105-115.
    5. Arinushkin, P.A. & Vadivasova, T.E., 2021. "Nonlinear damping effects in a simplified power grid model based on coupled Kuramoto-like oscillators with inertia," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. H Jönsson & J Johansson & H Johansson, 2008. "Identifying critical components in technical infrastructure networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(2), pages 235-243, June.
    7. Tianlei Zang & Zian Wang & Xiaoguang Wei & Yi Zhou & Jiale Wu & Buxiang Zhou, 2023. "Current Status and Perspective of Vulnerability Assessment of Cyber-Physical Power Systems Based on Complex Network Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-38, September.
    8. Ma, Xiangyu & Zhou, Huijie & Li, Zhiyi, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A complex network perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Carlo Bianca, 2022. "On the Modeling of Energy-Multisource Networks by the Thermostatted Kinetic Theory Approach: A Review with Research Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Koç, Yakup & Warnier, Martijn & Van Mieghem, Piet & Kooij, Robert E. & Brazier, Frances M.T., 2014. "A topological investigation of phase transitions of cascading failures in power grids," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 273-284.
    11. Wu, Di & Ma, Feng & Javadi, Milad & Thulasiraman, Krishnaiya & Bompard, Ettore & Jiang, John N., 2017. "A study of the impacts of flow direction and electrical constraints on vulnerability assessment of power grid using electrical betweenness measures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 295-309.
    12. Tianhua Li & Yanchao Du & Yongbo Yuan, 2019. "Use of Variable Fuzzy Clustering to Quantify the Vulnerability of a Power Grid to Earthquake Damage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Pagani, Giuliano Andrea & Aiello, Marco, 2013. "The Power Grid as a complex network: A survey," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(11), pages 2688-2700.
    14. Ouyang, Min & Zhao, Lijing & Hong, Liu & Pan, Zhezhe, 2014. "Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 38-46.
    15. Ouyang, Min & Pan, Zhezhe & Hong, Liu & Zhao, Lijing, 2014. "Correlation analysis of different vulnerability metrics on power grids," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 396(C), pages 204-211.
    16. Kim, Dong Hwan & Eisenberg, Daniel A. & Chun, Yeong Han & Park, Jeryang, 2017. "Network topology and resilience analysis of South Korean power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 13-24.
    17. Ma, Tian-Lin & Yao, Jian-Xi & Qi, Cheng & Zhu, Hong-Lu & Sun, Yu-Shu, 2013. "Non-monotonic increase of robustness with capacity tolerance in power grids," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(21), pages 5516-5524.
    18. Ettore Bompard & Lingen Luo & Enrico Pons, 2015. "A perspective overview of topological approaches for vulnerability analysis of power transmission grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 15-26.
    19. Shahpari, Alireza & Khansari, Mohammad & Moeini, Ali, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis of power grid with the network science approach based on actual grid characteristics: A case study in Iran," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 14-21.
    20. Winkler, James & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo & Stein, Robert & Subramanian, Devika, 2010. "Performance assessment of topologically diverse power systems subjected to hurricane events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 323-336.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:494:y:2018:i:c:p:186-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.