IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v482y2017icp728-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interrelation of structure and operational states in cascading failure of overloading lines in power grids

Author

Listed:
  • Xue, Fei
  • Bompard, Ettore
  • Huang, Tao
  • Jiang, Lin
  • Lu, Shaofeng
  • Zhu, Huaiying

Abstract

As the modern power system is expected to develop to a more intelligent and efficient version, i.e. the smart grid, or to be the central backbone of energy internet for free energy interactions, security concerns related to cascading failures have been raised with consideration of catastrophic results. The researches of topological analysis based on complex networks have made great contributions in revealing structural vulnerabilities of power grids including cascading failure analysis. However, existing literature with inappropriate assumptions in modeling still cannot distinguish the effects between the structure and operational state to give meaningful guidance for system operation. This paper is to reveal the interrelation between network structure and operational states in cascading failure and give quantitative evaluation by integrating both perspectives. For structure analysis, cascading paths will be identified by extended betweenness and quantitatively described by cascading drop and cascading gradient. Furthermore, the operational state for cascading paths will be described by loading level. Then, the risk of cascading failure along a specific cascading path can be quantitatively evaluated considering these two factors. The maximum cascading gradient of all possible cascading paths can be used as an overall metric to evaluate the entire power grid for its features related to cascading failure. The proposed method is tested and verified on IEEE30-bus system and IEEE118-bus system, simulation evidences presented in this paper suggests that the proposed model can identify the structural causes for cascading failure and is promising to give meaningful guidance for the protection of system operation in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue, Fei & Bompard, Ettore & Huang, Tao & Jiang, Lin & Lu, Shaofeng & Zhu, Huaiying, 2017. "Interrelation of structure and operational states in cascading failure of overloading lines in power grids," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 728-740.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:482:y:2017:i:c:p:728-740
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.04.061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437117303473
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2017.04.061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Kinney & P. Crucitti & R. Albert & V. Latora, 2005. "Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 101-107, July.
    2. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo, 2004. "A topological analysis of the Italian electric power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 338(1), pages 92-97.
    3. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo & Rapisarda, Andrea, 2004. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 340(1), pages 388-394.
    4. Dai, YuanYu & Chen, Guo & Dong, ZhaoYang & Xue, YuSheng & Hill, David J. & Zhao, Yuan, 2014. "An improved framework for power grid vulnerability analysis considering critical system features," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 395(C), pages 405-415.
    5. Chen, Guo & Dong, Zhao Yang & Hill, David J. & Zhang, Guo Hua & Hua, Ke Qian, 2010. "Attack structural vulnerability of power grids: A hybrid approach based on complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(3), pages 595-603.
    6. Chassin, David P. & Posse, Christian, 2005. "Evaluating North American electric grid reliability using the Barabási–Albert network model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 355(2), pages 667-677.
    7. Bompard, Ettore & Napoli, Roberto & Xue, Fei, 2009. "Analysis of structural vulnerabilities in power transmission grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 5-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Zhang & Jian Lu & Bai-bai Fu & Shu-bin Li, 2018. "A Review and Prospect for the Complexity and Resilience of Urban Public Transit Network Based on Complex Network Theory," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-36, December.
    2. Su, Jia & Huang, Guangqiu, 2018. "Simulation and analysis of ecosystem vulnerability with cascading spread caused by dust migration based on object function GeoPetri net," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 379(C), pages 54-72.
    3. Yang, Qihui & Scoglio, Caterina M. & Gruenbacher, Don M., 2021. "Robustness of supply chain networks against underload cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Hengdao & Zheng, Ciyan & Iu, Herbert Ho-Ching & Fernando, Tyrone, 2017. "A critical review of cascading failure analysis and modeling of power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 9-22.
    2. Zohre Alipour & Mohammad Ali Saniee Monfared & Enrico Zio, 2014. "Comparing topological and reliability-based vulnerability analysis of Iran power transmission network," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 139-151, April.
    3. Pagani, Giuliano Andrea & Aiello, Marco, 2013. "The Power Grid as a complex network: A survey," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(11), pages 2688-2700.
    4. Lucas Cuadra & Sancho Salcedo-Sanz & Javier Del Ser & Silvia Jiménez-Fernández & Zong Woo Geem, 2015. "A Critical Review of Robustness in Power Grids Using Complex Networks Concepts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-55, August.
    5. Vaibhav Gaur & Om Prakash Yadav & Gunjan Soni & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore, 2021. "A literature review on network reliability analysis and its engineering applications," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 167-181, April.
    6. H Jönsson & J Johansson & H Johansson, 2008. "Identifying critical components in technical infrastructure networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(2), pages 235-243, June.
    7. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    8. Koç, Yakup & Warnier, Martijn & Mieghem, Piet Van & Kooij, Robert E. & Brazier, Frances M.T., 2014. "The impact of the topology on cascading failures in a power grid model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 169-179.
    9. Ma, Xiangyu & Zhou, Huijie & Li, Zhiyi, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A complex network perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Carlo Bianca, 2022. "On the Modeling of Energy-Multisource Networks by the Thermostatted Kinetic Theory Approach: A Review with Research Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Wu, Di & Ma, Feng & Javadi, Milad & Thulasiraman, Krishnaiya & Bompard, Ettore & Jiang, John N., 2017. "A study of the impacts of flow direction and electrical constraints on vulnerability assessment of power grid using electrical betweenness measures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 295-309.
    12. Abeysinghe, Sathsara & Wu, Jianzhong & Sooriyabandara, Mahesh & Abeysekera, Muditha & Xu, Tao & Wang, Chengshan, 2018. "Topological properties of medium voltage electricity distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1101-1112.
    13. Negeri, Ebisa & Kuipers, Fernando & Baken, Nico, 2015. "Designing reliable and resilient smart low-voltage grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 24-37.
    14. Ouyang, Min & Zhao, Lijing & Hong, Liu & Pan, Zhezhe, 2014. "Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 38-46.
    15. Ouyang, Min & Pan, Zhezhe & Hong, Liu & Zhao, Lijing, 2014. "Correlation analysis of different vulnerability metrics on power grids," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 396(C), pages 204-211.
    16. Kim, Dong Hwan & Eisenberg, Daniel A. & Chun, Yeong Han & Park, Jeryang, 2017. "Network topology and resilience analysis of South Korean power grid," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 13-24.
    17. Sarah LaRocca & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel & Seth Guikema, 2015. "Topological Performance Measures as Surrogates for Physical Flow Models for Risk and Vulnerability Analysis for Electric Power Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 608-623, April.
    18. Nie, Yan & Zhang, Guoxing & Duan, Hongbo, 2020. "An interconnected panorama of future cross-regional power grid: A complex network approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Ettore Bompard & Lingen Luo & Enrico Pons, 2015. "A perspective overview of topological approaches for vulnerability analysis of power transmission grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 15-26.
    20. Shahpari, Alireza & Khansari, Mohammad & Moeini, Ali, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis of power grid with the network science approach based on actual grid characteristics: A case study in Iran," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 14-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:482:y:2017:i:c:p:728-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.