IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v209y2013i1p85-11410.1007-s10479-011-0870-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance analysis of CONWIP systems with batch size constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar Satyam
  • Ananth Krishnamurthy

Abstract

Multi-product manufacturing systems operating under CONWIP control are often modeled as closed queuing networks with synchronization stations. Performance analysis of these systems can be challenging, especially when batch size constraints are explicitly considered. This research develops a new approach for evaluating the performance of these systems based on parametric characterizations and traffic process approximations. The approach explicitly models the effect of batch size constraints on the departure process and waiting times at the different stations in the network to derive new characterization equations. These equations are used to derive a set of linking equations that is solved using an iterative algorithm to obtain estimates of network performance. Numerical studies indicate that the proposed method is yields fairly accurate performance estimates and can be useful in evaluating tradeoffs that guide managerial decisions. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar Satyam & Ananth Krishnamurthy, 2013. "Performance analysis of CONWIP systems with batch size constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 85-114, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:209:y:2013:i:1:p:85-114:10.1007/s10479-011-0870-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0870-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-011-0870-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-011-0870-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriel R. Bitran & Devanath Tirupati, 1988. "Multiproduct Queueing Networks with Deterministic Routing: Decomposition Approach and the Notion of Interference," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 75-100, January.
    2. Georg Krieg & Heinrich Kuhn, 2004. "Analysis of Multi-Product Kanban Systems with State-Dependent Setups and Lost Sales," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 141-166, January.
    3. George Liberopoulos & Yves Dallery, 2000. "A unified framework for pull control mechanisms in multi‐stage manufacturing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 325-355, January.
    4. Maria Di Mascolo & Yannick Frein & Yves Dallery, 1996. "An Analytical Method for Performance Evaluation of Kanban Controlled Production Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 50-64, February.
    5. Mark L. Spearman & Michael A. Zazanis, 1992. "Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 521-532, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cigdem Gurgur, 2013. "Optimal configuration of a decentralized, market-driven production/inventory system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 139-157, October.
    2. Park, Chan-Woo & Lee, Hyo-Seong, 2013. "Performance evaluation of a multi-product CONWIP assembly system with correlated external demands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 334-344.
    3. Wilhelm, W. E. & Som, Pradip, 1998. "Analysis of a single-stage, single-product, stochastic, MRP-controlled assembly system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 74-93, July.
    4. Fernandes, Nuno Octavio & do Carmo-Silva, Silvio, 2006. "Generic POLCA--A production and materials flow control mechanism for quick response manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 74-84, November.
    5. Zhao Xiaobo & Qiguo Gong & Kenichi Nakashima, 2001. "Analysis of a production system in a general configuration," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 128-143, March.
    6. Subba Rao, S. & Gunasekaran, A. & Goyal, S. K. & Martikainen, T., 1998. "Waiting line model applications in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Matta, Andrea & Dallery, Yves & Di Mascolo, Maria, 2005. "Analysis of assembly systems controlled with kanbans," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(2), pages 310-336, October.
    8. Fredendall, Lawrence D. & Ojha, Divesh & Wayne Patterson, J., 2010. "Concerning the theory of workload control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 99-111, February.
    9. Tardif, Valerie & Maaseidvaag, Lars, 2001. "An adaptive approach to controlling kanban systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 411-424, July.
    10. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson & Cristovao Silva & Silvio Carmo-Silva, 2019. "POLC-A: an assessment of POLCA’s authorization element," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2435-2447, August.
    11. Sohner, Volkmar & Schneeweiss, Christoph, 1995. "Hierarchically integrated lot size optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 73-90, October.
    12. Pradhan, Salil & Damodaran, Purushothaman & Srihari, Krishnaswami, 2008. "Predicting performance measures for Markovian type of manufacturing systems with product failures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 725-744, January.
    13. Kris Lieckens & Nico Vandaele, 2016. "Differential evolution to solve the lot size problem in stochastic supply chain management systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 239-263, July.
    14. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Jan A. Van Mieghem & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Incentives for Quality Through Endogenous Routing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 254-273, July.
    15. Nico Goossens & Ananth Krishnamurthy & Nico Vandaele, 2019. "Analysis of a fork/join station with inputs from a finite population subnetwork with multi-server stations," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 291-315, March.
    16. Yang, Feng, 2010. "Neural network metamodeling for cycle time-throughput profiles in manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 172-185, August.
    17. Papadopoulos, H. T. & Heavey, C., 1996. "Queueing theory in manufacturing systems analysis and design: A classification of models for production and transfer lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 1-27, July.
    18. Morabito, Reinaldo & de Souza, Mauricio C. & Vazquez, Mariana, 2014. "Approximate decomposition methods for the analysis of multicommodity flow routing in generalized queuing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 618-629.
    19. Lin, Yu-Hsin & Lee, Ching-En, 2001. "A total standard WIP estimation method for wafer fabrication," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 78-94, May.
    20. Kavusturucu, Ayse & Gupta, Surendra M., 1999. "Manufacturing systems with machine vacations, arbitrary topology and finite buffers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:209:y:2013:i:1:p:85-114:10.1007/s10479-011-0870-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.