IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v57y2010i5p403-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fully sequential procedures for comparing constrained systems via simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Sigrún Andradóttir
  • Seong‐Hee Kim

Abstract

We consider the problem of finding the system with the best primary performance measure among a finite number of simulated systems in the presence of a stochastic constraint on a single real‐valued secondary performance measure. Solving this problem requires the identification and removal from consideration of infeasible systems (Phase I) and of systems whose primary performance measure is dominated by that of other feasible systems (Phase II). We use indifference zones in both phases and consider two approaches, namely, carrying out Phases I and II sequentially and carrying out Phases I and II simultaneously, and we provide specific example procedures of each type. We present theoretical results guaranteeing that our approaches (general and specific, sequential and simultaneous) yield the best system with at least a prespecified probability, and we provide a portion of an extensive numerical study aimed at evaluating and comparing the performance of our approaches. The experimental results show that both new procedures are useful for constrained ranking and selection, with neither procedure showing uniform superiority over the other.© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2010

Suggested Citation

  • Sigrún Andradóttir & Seong‐Hee Kim, 2010. "Fully sequential procedures for comparing constrained systems via simulation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(5), pages 403-421, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:57:y:2010:i:5:p:403-421
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20408
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Butler & Douglas J. Morrice & Peter W. Mullarkey, 2001. "A Multiple Attribute Utility Theory Approach to Ranking and Selection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 800-816, June.
    2. Pichitlamken, Juta & Nelson, Barry L. & Hong, L. Jeff, 2006. "A sequential procedure for neighborhood selection-of-the-best in optimization via simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 283-298, August.
    3. Barry L. Nelson & Julie Swann & David Goldsman & Wheyming Song, 2001. "Simple Procedures for Selecting the Best Simulated System When the Number of Alternatives is Large," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 950-963, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juergen Branke & Wen Zhang, 2019. "Identifying efficient solutions via simulation: myopic multi-objective budget allocation for the bi-objective case," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(3), pages 831-865, September.
    2. Ye Chen & Ilya O. Ryzhov, 2023. "Balancing Optimal Large Deviations in Sequential Selection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3457-3473, June.
    3. Jing Xie & Peter I. Frazier, 2013. "Sequential Bayes-Optimal Policies for Multiple Comparisons with a Known Standard," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1174-1189, October.
    4. Demet Batur & Lina Wang & F. Fred Choobineh, 2018. "Methods for System Selection Based on Sequential Mean–Variance Analysis," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 724-738, November.
    5. Chuljin Park & Seong-Hee Kim, 2015. "Penalty Function with Memory for Discrete Optimization via Simulation with Stochastic Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1195-1212, October.
    6. Lee, Mi Lim & Park, Chuljin & Park, Dong Uk, 2018. "Self-adjusting the tolerance level in a fully sequential feasibility check procedure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 733-745.
    7. Susan R. Hunter & Raghu Pasupathy, 2013. "Optimal Sampling Laws for Stochastically Constrained Simulation Optimization on Finite Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 527-542, August.
    8. Tsai, Shing Chih & Yeh, Yingchieh & Kuo, Chen Yun, 2021. "Efficient optimization algorithms for surgical scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 579-593.
    9. Yuwei Zhou & Sigrún Andradóttir & Seong-Hee Kim & Chuljin Park, 2022. "Finding Feasible Systems for Subjective Constraints Using Recycled Observations," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3080-3095, November.
    10. L. Jeff Hong & Jun Luo & Barry L. Nelson, 2015. "Chance Constrained Selection of the Best," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 317-334, May.
    11. Zhongshun Shi & Siyang Gao & Hui Xiao & Weiwei Chen, 2019. "A worst‐case formulation for constrained ranking and selection with input uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(8), pages 648-662, December.
    12. Zhongshun Shi & Yijie Peng & Leyuan Shi & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu, 2022. "Dynamic Sampling Allocation Under Finite Simulation Budget for Feasibility Determination," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 557-568, January.
    13. Qiushi Chen & Lei Zhao & Jan C. Fransoo & Zhe Li, 2019. "Dual-mode inventory management under a chance credit constraint," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 147-178, March.
    14. Peter I. Frazier, 2014. "A Fully Sequential Elimination Procedure for Indifference-Zone Ranking and Selection with Tight Bounds on Probability of Correct Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 926-942, August.
    15. Shing Chih Tsai & Wu Hung Lin & Chia Cheng Wu & Shao Jen Weng & Ching Fen Tang, 2022. "Decision support algorithms for optimizing surgery start times considering the performance variation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 208-221, June.
    16. Ruijing Wu & Shaoxuan Liu & Zhenyang Shi, 2019. "Customer Incentive Rebalancing Plan in Free-Float Bike-Sharing System with Limited Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Weiwei Chen & Siyang Gao & Wenjie Chen & Jianzhong Du, 2023. "Optimizing resource allocation in service systems via simulation: A Bayesian formulation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 65-81, January.
    18. Shing Chih Tsai, 2013. "Rapid Screening Procedures for Zero-One Optimization via Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 317-331, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shing Chih Tsai & Wu Hung Lin & Chia Cheng Wu & Shao Jen Weng & Ching Fen Tang, 2022. "Decision support algorithms for optimizing surgery start times considering the performance variation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 208-221, June.
    2. Tsai, Shing Chih & Chen, Sin Ting, 2017. "A simulation-based multi-objective optimization framework: A case study on inventory management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 148-159.
    3. Healey, Christopher M. & Andradóttir, Sigrún & Kim, Seong-Hee, 2013. "Efficient comparison of constrained systems using dormancy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 340-352.
    4. Teng, Suyan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2010. "Integration of indifference-zone with multi-objective computing budget allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 419-429, June.
    5. Tsai, Shing Chih, 2011. "Selecting the best simulated system with weighted control-variate estimators," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 705-717.
    6. Shing Chih Tsai & Tse Yang, 2017. "Rapid screening algorithms for stochastically constrained problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 425-447, July.
    7. Tsai, Shing Chih & Chu, I-Hao, 2012. "Controlled multistage selection procedures for comparison with a standard," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 709-721.
    8. Eric C. Ni & Dragos F. Ciocan & Shane G. Henderson & Susan R. Hunter, 2017. "Efficient Ranking and Selection in Parallel Computing Environments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 821-836, June.
    9. Jun Luo & L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson & Yang Wu, 2015. "Fully Sequential Procedures for Large-Scale Ranking-and-Selection Problems in Parallel Computing Environments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1177-1194, October.
    10. Shing Chih Tsai, 2013. "Rapid Screening Procedures for Zero-One Optimization via Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 317-331, May.
    11. Emily A. Heath & John E. Mitchell & Thomas C. Sharkey, 2016. "Applying ranking and selection procedures to long-term mitigation for improved network restoration," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 447-481, September.
    12. Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng & Teng, Suyan & Chen, Yankai, 2008. "Multi-objective simulation-based evolutionary algorithm for an aircraft spare parts allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 476-491, September.
    13. Jürgen Branke & Stephen E. Chick & Christian Schmidt, 2007. "Selecting a Selection Procedure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(12), pages 1916-1932, December.
    14. Emre Barut & Warren Powell, 2014. "Optimal learning for sequential sampling with non-parametric beliefs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 517-543, March.
    15. MacKenzie, Cameron A. & Hu, Chao, 2019. "Decision making under uncertainty for design of resilient engineered systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Gutjahr, Walter J. & Katzensteiner, Stefan & Reiter, Peter & Stummer, Christian & Denk, Michaela, 2010. "Multi-objective decision analysis for competence-oriented project portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 670-679, September.
    17. Chao Fu & Weiyong Liu & Wenjun Chang, 2020. "Data-driven multiple criteria decision making for diagnosis of thyroid cancer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 833-862, October.
    18. Peter Mullarkey & Grant Butler & Srinagesh Gavirneni & Douglas Morrice, 2007. "Schlumberger Uses Simulation in Bidding and Executing Land Seismic Surveys," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 120-132, April.
    19. Alrefaei, Mahmoud H. & Alawneh, Ameen J., 2005. "Solution quality of random search methods for discrete stochastic optimization," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 115-125.
    20. Jie Xu & Barry L. Nelson & L. Jeff Hong, 2013. "An Adaptive Hyperbox Algorithm for High-Dimensional Discrete Optimization via Simulation Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 133-146, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:57:y:2010:i:5:p:403-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.