IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v80y2019icp370-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data compatibility between the Land and Building Cadaster (LBC) and the Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) in the context of area-based payments: A case study in the Polish Region of Warmia and Mazury

Author

Listed:
  • Kocur-Bera, Katarzyna

Abstract

The Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS), a key control mechanism under the Common Agricultural Policy, plays a very important role in verifying eligibility for area-based subsidies, monitoring farmers’ cross-compliance with selected environmental rules, and rural development programs (agri-environmental programs, support for areas with unfavorable conditions for land management, agricultural practices that deliver environmental and climate benefits, greening obligations). The EU Member States were guided by different principles in the process of developing their LPIS. The basic unit in the LIPS database is the reference parcel which has been defined based on various criteria in the EU countries (cadastral parcels, agricultural parcels, farmer’s blocks or physical blocks). In Poland, LPIS data are used in the process of updating the Land and Building Cadaster (LBC) segment of the Land Administration System. The LAS is a public register of buildings, land and property rights. It is used for planning, taxation, identification of property in land and mortgage registers, public statistics and land management. The relevant resources, in particular cadastral maps, are characterized by various degrees of quality because they have been developed from archive and historical materials. The aim of this study was to analyze the compatibility between LPIS and LBC data in Poland. The study was carried out in three villages in the municipality of Dobre Miasto, Region of Warmia and Mazury in Poland. Nearly 5000 objects were measured, and 11 features characterizing differences in both registers were analyzed. The results revealed numerous discrepancies in both LPIS and LBC relating to the analyzed area. The majority of the identified differences between the data in the compared registers concerned the location of boundary points, area and descriptions of land use. Both databases should be regularly compared with the use of modern measurement techniques to account for changes in agricultural land use.

Suggested Citation

  • Kocur-Bera, Katarzyna, 2019. "Data compatibility between the Land and Building Cadaster (LBC) and the Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) in the context of area-based payments: A case study in the Polish Region of Warmia and ," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 370-379.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:80:y:2019:i:c:p:370-379
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718300711
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wainger, Lisa A. & King, Dennis M. & Mack, Richard N. & Price, Elizabeth W. & Maslin, Thomas, 2010. "Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 978-987, March.
    2. Candel, Jeroen J.L. & Breeman, Gerard E. & Stiller, Sabina J. & Termeer, Catrien J.A.M., 2014. "Disentangling the consensus frame of food security: The case of the EU Common Agricultural Policy reform debate," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 47-58.
    3. Mika, Monika, 2018. "An analysis of possibilities for the establishment of a multipurpose and multidimensional cadastre in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 446-453.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Przewięźlikowska, Anna, 2020. "Legal aspects of synchronising data on real property location in polish cadastre and land and mortgage register," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Kocur-Bera, Katarzyna, 2020. "Understanding information about agricultural land. An evaluation of the extent of data modification in the Land Parcel Identification System for the needs of area-based payments – a case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Agnieszka Trystuła & Małgorzata Dudzińska & Ryszard Źróbek, 2020. "Evaluation of the Completeness of Spatial Data Infrastructure in the Context of Cadastral Data Sharing," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of the Urban Cadastral System in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Basista, Izabela & Balawejder, Monika, 2020. "Assessment of selected land consolidation in south-eastern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Cieślak, Iwona, 2019. "Identification of areas exposed to land use conflict with the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladimír Raškovič & Zlatica Muchová & František Petrovič, 2019. "A New Approach to the Registration of Buildings towards 3D Land and Property Management in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Fander Falconí & Juan Cadillo Benalcazar & Freddy Llive Cóndor & Jesus Ramos-Martin & Belén Liger, 2015. "Pérdida de autosuficiencia alimentaria y posibilidades de complementariedad agrícola en los países de UNASUR," Documentos de Trabajo CEPROEC 2015_06, Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales, Centro de Prospectiva Estratégica.
    3. Sonter, L.J. & Moran, C.J. & Barrett, D.J., 2013. "Modeling the impact of revegetation on regional water quality: A collective approach to manage the cumulative impacts of mining in the Bowen Basin, Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 670-677.
    4. Cerrada-Serra, Pedro & Ortiz-Miranda, Dionisio, 2015. "Disentangling the connections between the GMO-related food system and food and nutrition security in Europe: A concept map from a systematic literature review," 148th Seminar, November 30-December 1, 2015, The Hague, The Netherlands 229268, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Yun Jiang & Guoming Du & Hao Teng & Jun Wang & Haolin Li, 2023. "Multi-Scenario Land Use Change Simulation and Spatial Response of Ecosystem Service Value in Black Soil Region of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Bagdon, Benjamin A. & Huang, Ching-Hsun & Dewhurst, Stephen, 2016. "Managing for ecosystem services in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests using a novel simulation-to-optimization methodology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 324(C), pages 11-27.
    7. Ho¨lzinger, Oliver & Horst, Dan van der & Sadler, Jon, 2014. "City-wide Ecosystem Assessments—Lessons from Birmingham," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 98-105.
    8. Xuemao Zhang & Binggeng Xie & Junhan Li & Chuan Yuan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Driving Force Analysis of the Ecosystem Service Value in the Fujiang River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Wei Wang & Chongmei Zhang & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2021. "The Impact of Target Price Policy on Cotton Cultivation: Analysis of County-Level Panel Data from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Chaolei Yang & Jingyuan Li & Shuwen Jiang & Yufeng Tian & Canfeng Li & Wantao Yang & Haichuan Duan & Zong Wei & Yong Huang, 2024. "The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Wu, Ziping & Pei, Pei, 2018. "Potential Impacts of Changes in Single Farm Payment (SFP) on Rural Economy in Northern Ireland (NI)," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 272089, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Muscat, A. & de Olde, E.M. & Candel, J.J.L. & de Boer, I.J.M. & Ripoll-Bosch, R., 2022. "The Promised Land: Contrasting frames of marginal land in the European Union," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    13. Yanjun Tong & Jun Lei & Shubao Zhang & Xiaolei Zhang & Tianyu Rong & Liqin Fan & Zuliang Duan, 2023. "Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Variability and Factors Influencing the Ecological Resilience in the Urban Agglomeration on the Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Spiller, Achim & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & Sonntag, Winnie, 2016. "Gibt es eine Zukunft für die moderne konventionelle Tierhaltung in Nordwesteuropa?," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260780, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    15. Lawrence W. C. Lai & Stephen N. G. Davies & Lennon H. T. Choy & K. W. Chau, 2022. "Land Planning, Property Rights and Management of Built Heritage: Some Hong Kong Observations of Colonial Military Buildings," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Czyżewski, Andrzej & Grochowska, Reanata & Józwiak, Wojciech & Kosior, Katarzyna & Kułyk, Piotr & Mirkowska, Zofia, 2014. "Development trends in agricultural sector and policies − challenges for the future (Synthesis)," Multiannual Program Reports 206066, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    17. Lara V. Sibbing & Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2021. "Realizing urban food policy: a discursive institutionalist analysis of Ede municipality," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(3), pages 571-582, June.
    18. Sabrina Arcuri, 2019. "Food poverty, food waste and the consensus frame on charitable food redistribution in Italy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 263-275, June.
    19. Adriana Mihnea & Ramona Mihaela Costache & Andrei Radutu, 2018. "Food Safety as a Global Public Good in the Context of Common Agricultural Policy Case Study: Demand Side Evaluation using MutliCriterial Analysis in Bulgaria," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 230-242, April.
    20. Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2018. "Systems view of future of wicked problems to be addressed by the Common Agricultural Policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 683-695.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:80:y:2019:i:c:p:370-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.