IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1516-d910293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Planning, Property Rights and Management of Built Heritage: Some Hong Kong Observations of Colonial Military Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence W. C. Lai

    (Coase Centre for Porperty Rights Research, Department of Real Estate & Constriction, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Stephen N. G. Davies

    (Department of Real Estate & Constriction, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Lennon H. T. Choy

    (Coase Centre for Porperty Rights Research, Department of Real Estate & Constriction, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • K. W. Chau

    (Coase Centre for Porperty Rights Research, Department of Real Estate & Constriction, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

There has been much confusion in property rights inquiry into real (immovable) property (i.e., land) between open access and common property, and between public property and common property because that is often also open access. This paper argues that the property rights and access control are two distinct dimensions of land resource management. Access control involves the exercise of exclusionary power relevant to the management of the immovable property (property management) for its optimal use. A review of the literature shows that definitions of property management tend to be too narrow but point towards the need to articulate issues within the property rights paradigm. As a contribution to sustainable resource use as a dimension of land planning, this paper points out and discusses the probable sources of the confusion between land property rights and property management. A “Land Property Rights and Management Matrix” (LPRMM) is developed as a theoretical tool for clarifying the confusion and the relationships amongst relevant concepts. The LPRMM is theoretically informed by Barzel’s not entirely correct distinction between legal (de jure) and economic (de facto) rights and enriched by relevant literature on property rights and property management. Practical use of the LPRMM is illustrated by its application to analyze the issues pertaining to the actual resource-use phenomena in colonial military buildings erected on both private and public land in Hong Kong. The results show that heritage buildings on land under public ownership as private property can be neglected or intensively managed. The LPRMM is not only a useful theoretical tool for precisely assessing the actual affairs of resource use but also a practical tool for identifying issues of property management in its widest sense. The LPRMM offered is a proper interpretation of Barzel’s distinction between legal and economic rights and contributes to systematically re-interpreting property management as town planning writ large in terms of de jure property rights and de facto access.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence W. C. Lai & Stephen N. G. Davies & Lennon H. T. Choy & K. W. Chau, 2022. "Land Planning, Property Rights and Management of Built Heritage: Some Hong Kong Observations of Colonial Military Buildings," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1516-:d:910293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bimonte, Salvatore, 2008. "The "tragedy of tourism resources" as the outcome of a strategic game: A new analytical framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 457-464, October.
    2. Mika, Monika, 2018. "An analysis of possibilities for the establishment of a multipurpose and multidimensional cadastre in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 446-453.
    3. Alchian, Armen A. & Demsetz, Harold, 1973. "The Property Right Paradigm," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 16-27, March.
    4. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2010-002 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mohd Nazali Moh Noor & Michael Pitt, 2010. "Defining Facilities Management (Fm) In The Malaysian Perspective," ERES eres2010_002, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    6. L W C Lai, 1999. "Hayek and Town Planning: A Note on Hayek's Views towards Town Planning in The Constitution of Liberty," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(9), pages 1567-1582, September.
    7. Daniel W. Bromley, 1978. "Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Environmental Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 43-60, March.
    8. Pedro Pintassilgo & João Albino Silva, 2007. "‘Tragedy of the Commons’ in the Tourism Accommodation Industry," Tourism Economics, , vol. 13(2), pages 209-224, June.
    9. John Quiggin, 1988. "Private and Common Property Rights in the Economics of the Environment," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 1071-1087, December.
    10. Cheung, Steven N S, 1974. "A Theory of Price Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(1), pages 53-71, April.
    11. Tris Kee & Kwong Wing Chau, 2020. "Adaptive reuse of heritage architecture and its external effects on sustainable built environment—Hedonic pricing model and case studies in Hong Kong," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1597-1608, November.
    12. Wright, William C.C. & Eppink, Florian V., 2016. "Drivers of heritage value: A meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 277-284.
    13. James Swaney, 1990. "The environmental imperative of socio-economics," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 45-58, September.
    14. Friendly, Abigail, 2020. "Sharing the unearned increment: Divergent Outcomes in Toronto and São Paulo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Marena Brinkhurst, 2010. "In the Shadow of the Anticommons: The Paradox of Overlapping Exclusion Rights and Open-Access Resource Degradation in India's Wastelands," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 139-162.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence W.C. Lai, 2020. "Sustainable development of heritage conservation and tourism: A Hong Kong case study on colonial heritage," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1181-1188, September.
    2. Toufique, Kazi Ali, 1997. "Some observations on power and property rights in the inland fisheries of Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 457-467, March.
    3. Li Tian & Xu Guo & Wei Yin, 2017. "From urban sprawl to land consolidation in suburban Shanghai under the backdrop of increasing versus decreasing balance policy: A perspective of property rights transfer," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 878-896, March.
    4. Jongwook Kim & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2002. "Resource-based and property rights perspectives on value creation: the case of oil field unitization," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4-5), pages 225-245.
    5. Mark Hansley Chua, 2017. "A Coasian perspective on informal rights assignment among waste pickers in the Philippines," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(13), pages 3071-3084, October.
    6. Spash, Clive L. & Villena, Mauricio G., 1999. "Exploring the Approach of Institutional Economics to the Environment," MPRA Paper 17278, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Araujo, Claudio & Bonjean, Catherine Araujo & Combes, Jean-Louis & Combes Motel, Pascale & Reis, Eustaquio J., 2009. "Property rights and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2461-2468, June.
    8. YAMADA Keigo, 2024. "Literature Review of Cultural Heritage Economics - Focus on theoretical research of built heritage - (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 24014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    9. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    10. Djimoudjiel, Djekonbe & Tchoffo Tameko, Gautier, 2019. "Land conflicts and land tenure effects on agriculture productivity in Chad," MPRA Paper 97696, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tamara Todorova, 2006. "Rental Rate and the Dynamics of Capital," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 58-68.
    12. Przewięźlikowska, Anna, 2020. "Legal aspects of synchronising data on real property location in polish cadastre and land and mortgage register," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    14. Melle Marco C., 2014. "Eine europäische Bemessungsgrundlage für die Körperschaftsteuer? Konzeption und ordnungsökonomische Analyse / Conceptual design and constitutional economics analysis of a European tax base for corpora," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 133-156, January.
    15. Stukach, Victor & Grishaev, Egor, 2008. "Агропродовольственный Рынок Региона: Классификация Институтов, Административные Барьеры, Трансакционные Издержки, Неэффективные Посредники [The region's agro-food market: the classification of inst," MPRA Paper 79290, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Apr 2017.
    16. Flores Thomas Edward, 2014. "Vertical Inequality, Land Reform, and Insurgency in Colombia," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 5-31, January.
    17. Jean-Baptiste Fleury & Alain Marciano, 2022. "Methodological Individualism and the Foundations of the "Law and Economics" movement," Post-Print hal-03820441, HAL.
    18. Lin Meng & Chuanguang Zhu & Jie Pu & Bo Wen & Wentao Si, 2022. "Study on the Influence Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage Distribution from Man–Land Relationship Perspective: A Case Study in Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Chenavaz, Régis Y. & Leocata, Marta & Ogonowska, Malgorzata & Torre, Dominique, 2022. "Sustainable tourism," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Sumbo, Dennis Kamaanaa, 2022. "Indigenes’ exclusion from neo-customary land: A perspective from changes in usufruct rights in Pramso, peri-urban Kumasi – Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1516-:d:910293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.