IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i4p399-d533573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Kocur-Bera

    (Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Hubert Frąszczak

    (Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

The cadaster functions laid down in the law should guarantee the safety of one’s rights. The reliability of the data gathered in the cadaster affects decisions concerning specific real estate or taken within the sphere of economic management. The legislation often requires the use of cadastral data, which makes it necessary to keep it up-to-date and coherent with the situation in the field. The effects of a lack of coherence may impact public finances and land management. Maintaining high-quality cadastral data is time-consuming and expensive. This study analysed the data coherence between the state in the field and cadastral documents. The analysis was based mainly on the information about the area of a plot and land use. The coherence index showed that the differences between registers and the state in the field range from 30% to 80%. This can be changed by comprehensive data modernisation, which can be facilitated using modern technology. Given the diverse use of cadastral data and the global trends in cadaster development and implementation of the third dimension, the currency and reliability of cadastral data become particularly important.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:399-:d:533573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larsson, Karolina & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny, 2020. "Representation of 3D cadastral boundaries - From analogue to digital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Karabin, Marcin & Kitsakis, Dimitrios & Koeva, Mila & Navratil, Gerhard & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Vučić, Nikola & Janečka, Karel & Lisec, Anka, 2020. "Layer approach to ownership in 3D cadastre in the case of underground tunnels," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Oukes, Peter & Andel, Marc van & Folmer, Erwin & Bennett, Rohan & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2021. "Domain-Driven Design applied to land administration system development: Lessons from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Asghari, Ali & Kalantari, Mohsen & Rajabifard, Abbas, 2020. "A structured framework for 3D cadastral data validation − a case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Kocur-Bera, Katarzyna, 2019. "Data compatibility between the Land and Building Cadaster (LBC) and the Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) in the context of area-based payments: A case study in the Polish Region of Warmia and ," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 370-379.
    7. Cienciała, Agnieszka & Sobolewska-Mikulska, Katarzyna & Sobura, Szymon, 2021. "Credibility of the cadastral data on land use and the methodology for their verification and update," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Bieda & Agnieszka Cienciała, 2021. "Towards a Renewable Energy Source Cadastre—A Review of Examples from around the World," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-34, December.
    2. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Iwona Grzelka, 2022. "Impact of Modern Technologies on the Organization of the Cadastral Data Modernization Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Metaferia, Mekonnen Tesfaye & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Alemie, Berhanu Kefale & Koeva, Mila, 2023. "The peri-urban cadastre of Addis Ababa: Status, challenges, and fit-for-purpose prospects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Bahram Saeidian & Abbas Rajabifard & Behnam Atazadeh & Mohsen Kalantari, 2021. "Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Przewięźlikowska, Anna, 2020. "Legal aspects of synchronising data on real property location in polish cadastre and land and mortgage register," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Lvhua Wang & Xinxin Zhou & Jian Shen & Shuting Zhou, 2024. "Geovisualization: an optimization algorithm of viewpoint generation for 3D cadastral property units," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 91-116, January.
    6. Hajji, Rafika & El Asri, Hanae & Ez-Zriouli, Chaymae, 2023. "Upgrading to 3D cadastre in Morocco: Lessons learned from benchmarking of international 3D cadastral systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen & Meichen Fu, 2024. "A Review of Research on the Value Evaluation of Urban Underground Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Schatz, Eva-Maria & Bovet, Jana & Lieder, Sebastian & Schroeter-Schlaack, Christoph & Strunz, Sebastian & Marquard, Elisabeth, 2021. "Land take in environmental assessments: Recent advances and persisting challenges in selected EU countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    11. Jesper M. Paasch & Jenny Paulsson, 2021. "3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    12. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Agnieszka Cienciała & Szymon Sobura & Katarzyna Sobolewska-Mikulska, 2022. "Optimising Land Consolidation by Implementing UAV Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Fatih Döner & Samet Şirin, 2020. "3D Digital Representation of Cadastral Data in Turkey—Apartments Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Kocur-Bera, Katarzyna, 2020. "Understanding information about agricultural land. An evaluation of the extent of data modification in the Land Parcel Identification System for the needs of area-based payments – a case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Sun, Jing & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Tarandi, Väino & Harrie, Lars, 2023. "A BIM-based approach to design a lifecycle 3D property formation process: A Swedish case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Julia Velastegui-Cáceres & Víctor M. Rodríguez-Espinosa & Oswaldo Padilla-Almeida, 2020. "Urban Cadastral Situation in Ecuador: Analysis to Determine the Degree of Proximity of the Cadastral Systems to the 3D Cadastral Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Cieślak, Iwona, 2019. "Identification of areas exposed to land use conflict with the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    20. Ali Asghari & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Formative and Summative Validation of Building Information Model-Based Cadastral Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:399-:d:533573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.