IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v77y2018icp524-533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Bossuyt, Daniël
  • Salet, Willem
  • Majoor, Stan

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between self-build housing and the wider planning and housing regime. Although there is growing policy and academic attention to self-build housing, there is a lack of understanding of the institutional and regulatory conditions shaping the prospects of such housing provision. This paper takes the case of The Netherlands and scrutinizes how institutional dynamics over time have made lower and middle residents dependent on densely organized consortia of municipalities, housing associations and developers. These norms of land development appear to be at odds with the logic of self-building. Through exploring evidence in a pilot study of a municipal self-building scheme in Almere, the authors suggest that making self-building the cornerstone of a resident-led land development strategy, also for low- and middle-incomes, implies a reconfiguration of the actors’ positions in housing provision. This entails a commissioning role for residents in the institutional domain of social and commercial developers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bossuyt, Daniël & Salet, Willem & Majoor, Stan, 2018. "Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 524-533.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:524-533
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717312048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Mullins & Tom Moore, 2018. "Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Jochem de Vries, 2015. "Planning and Culture Unfolded: The Cases of Flanders and the Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 2148-2164, November.
    3. van Karnenbeek, Lilian & Janssen-Jansen, Leonie, 2018. "Playing by the rules? Analysing incremental urban developments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 402-409.
    4. J Barlow & A King, 1992. "The State, the Market, and Competitive Strategy: The Housebuilding Industry in the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(3), pages 381-400, March.
    5. Michael Ball, 1998. "Institutions in British Property Research: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1501-1517, August.
    6. David Mullins & Tom Moore, 2018. "Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Edwin Buitelaar, 2010. "Window On The Netherlands: Cracks In The Myth: Challenges To Land Policy In The Netherlands," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(3), pages 349-356, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Federico Savini, 2023. "Maintaining autonomy: Urban degrowth and the commoning of housing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 1231-1248, May.
    2. Gan, Xiaolong & Liu, Lanchi & Wen, Tao & Webber, Ronald, 2022. "Modelling interrelationships between barriers to adopting green building technologies in China's rural housing via grey-DEMATEL," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angeliki Paidakaki & Richard Lang, 2021. "Uncovering Social Sustainability in Housing Systems through the Lens of Institutional Capital: A Study of Two Housing Alliances in Vienna, Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2014. "The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 12, pages 248-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Lucy Oates & Abhijit Datey & Andrew Sudmant & Ross Gillard & Andy Gouldson, 2024. "Community Participation in Urban Land and Housing Delivery: Evidence from Kerala (India) and Dar es Salaam (Tanzania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Michael Ball, 2003. "Markets and the Structure of the Housebuilding Industry: An International Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 897-916, May.
    5. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. De Vries, 2018. "Indicators for Measuring Spatial Justice and Land Tenure Security for Poor and Low Income Urban Dwellers," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-34, July.
    6. Robert Read & Alison Hirst & Alison Pooley & NezHapi-Delle Odeleye, 2024. "Negotiating Shared Lives: Territorialisation and Conviviality in an Urban Community Land Trust," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Jieming Zhu, 2005. "A Transitional Institution for the Emerging Land Market in Urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1369-1390, July.
    8. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    9. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
    10. Ho-Yin Yue, 2012. "Why housing price in Hong Kong? An explanation in game theory approach," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 8-15.
    11. Andreas Hendricks & Peter Lacoere & Erwin van der Krabben & Cynthia Oorschot, 2021. "Limits of Negotiable Developer Obligations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Antoine Paccoud & Markus Hesse & Tom Becker & Magdalena Górczyńska, 2022. "Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1782-1799, October.
    13. Bo-sin Tang & Lennon H. T. Choy & Joshua K. F. Wat, 2000. "Certainty and Discretion in Planning Control: A Case Study of Office Development in Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2465-2483, December.
    14. Olszewski, Robert & Pałka, Piotr & Wendland, Agnieszka & Majdzińska, Karolina, 2021. "Application of cooperative game theory in a spatial context: An example of the application of the community-led local development instrument for the decision support system of biogas plants constructi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. repec:dgr:rugsom:02d31 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Justin Kadi & Sako Musterd, 2015. "Housing for the poor in a neo-liberalising just city: Still affordable, but increasingly inaccessible," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(3), pages 246-262, July.
    17. Edwin Buitelaar & Hans Leinfelder, 2020. "Public Design of Urban Sprawl: Governments and the Extension of the Urban Fabric in Flanders and the Netherlands," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 46-57.
    18. Edwin Buitelaar, 2004. "A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2539-2553, December.
    19. Rob Imrie & Peter Hall, 2001. "An Exploration of Disability and the Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 333-350, February.
    20. Jieming Zhu, 2004. "From Land Use Right to Land Development Right: Institutional Change in China's Urban Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 1249-1267, June.
    21. Holtslag-Broekhof, Sanne, 2018. "Urban land readjustment: Necessary for effective urban renewal? Analysing the Dutch quest for new legislation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 821-828.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:524-533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.