IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v38y2001i2p333-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploration of Disability and the Development Process

Author

Listed:
  • Rob Imrie

    (Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK, r.imrie@rhul.ac.uk)

  • Peter Hall

    (Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK, p.hall@rhul.ac.uk)

Abstract

This paper explores the attitudes and practices of property developers and related agents in facilitating or constraining disabled people's access in the built environment. While acknowledging that the development process is characterised by a range of socio-institutional structures and relations which are insensitive to and ignorant of the needs of disabled people, we develop the proposition that developers' responses to disabled people are not necessarily invariant, predictable or reducible to a cost calculus. Rather, our evidence is illustrative of a heterogeneity of developers' attitudes and responses to the needs of disabled people. We conclude by commenting on practical and political possibilities for changing the social relations of the development process in ways which will incorporate access as an integral element of the design and development of the built environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Rob Imrie & Peter Hall, 2001. "An Exploration of Disability and the Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 333-350, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:2:p:333-350
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980124545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980124545
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980124545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Ball, 1998. "Institutions in British Property Research: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1501-1517, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jieming Zhu, 2005. "A Transitional Institution for the Emerging Land Market in Urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1369-1390, July.
    2. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    3. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
    4. Ho-Yin Yue, 2012. "Why housing price in Hong Kong? An explanation in game theory approach," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 8-15.
    5. Olszewski, Robert & Pałka, Piotr & Wendland, Agnieszka & Majdzińska, Karolina, 2021. "Application of cooperative game theory in a spatial context: An example of the application of the community-led local development instrument for the decision support system of biogas plants constructi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. repec:dgr:rugsom:02d31 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2014. "The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 12, pages 248-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Edwin Buitelaar, 2004. "A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2539-2553, December.
    9. Jieming Zhu, 2004. "From Land Use Right to Land Development Right: Institutional Change in China's Urban Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 1249-1267, June.
    10. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2007. "(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(2), pages 209-229, February.
    11. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Simon Guy & John Henneberry & Steven Rowley, 2002. "Development Cultures and Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1181-1196, June.
    13. Susan J. Smith & Moira Munro & Hazel Christie, 2006. "Performing (Housing) Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 81-98, January.
    14. Kauko Tom, 2019. "Institutions at the Interface of Urban Planning and Real Estate," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 17-30, September.
    15. Eamonn D'Arcy & Geoffrey Keogh, 1999. "The Property Market and Urban Competitiveness: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 917-928, May.
    16. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2004. "Land Re-Use, Complexity And Actor-Networks: A Framework For Research," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2004-09, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    17. Thierry Theurillat & Patrick Rérat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2015. "The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(8), pages 1414-1433, June.
    18. Sun Sheng Han & Yong Wang, 2003. "The Institutional Structure of a Property Market in Inland China: Chongqing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 91-112, January.
    19. Callum Ward & Manuel B Aalbers, 2016. "Virtual special issue editorial essay: ‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1760-1783, July.
    20. Kristian James Ruming, 2009. "Development Configurations and Planning Negotiations: A Case of Fringe Development in Sydney, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1461-1483, June.
    21. Bossuyt, Daniël & Salet, Willem & Majoor, Stan, 2018. "Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 524-533.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:2:p:333-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.