IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v128y2023ics0264837723000534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflict dynamics over farmland use in the multifunctional countryside

Author

Listed:
  • Czarnecki, Adam
  • Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Dominika
  • Widła-Domaradzki, Łukasz
  • Jórasz-Żak, Anna

Abstract

Recent research confirms the growing scale and frequency of land use conflicts. Such conflicts primarily affect rural areas and farmland due to urban expansion or transformations towards multifunctionality. This paper, therefore, aims to identify changes in the scale and structure of farmland use conflicts among the three main competing functions (production, consumption and protection) drawing upon Holmes’ conceptualisation of the multifunctional countryside. Unlike other research, based mainly on qualitative case studies, we use Shannon entropy and the administrative courts’ database in Poland to analyse farmland use conflicts in a quantitative approach. Our results show the growing dynamics and changing conflict structure observed in time and space but also, to some extent, depending on the composition and configuration of land functions. The findings also prove the importance of (EU, large-scale, nationwide) agricultural and environmental policies in increasing the number of conflict cases. A shift in the conflict line is observed from mainly production-consumption conflicts to conflicts within a single function (production-production) and production-protection conflicts. The changing structure of farmland use conflicts is shaped by the level of development of the production function considered in terms of size and ownership structures as well as its economic performance. In light of this study, land use conflicts, often perceived as socially undesirable, are not necessarily unfavourable, as they manifest a growing capacity to engage in dispute and include weak, forgotten or intentionally excluded actors in the process of building resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Czarnecki, Adam & Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Dominika & Widła-Domaradzki, Łukasz & Jórasz-Żak, Anna, 2023. "Conflict dynamics over farmland use in the multifunctional countryside," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:128:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723000534
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723000534
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Habibullah Magsi & Andre Torr & Yansui Liu & M. Javed Sheikh, 2017. "Land Use Conflicts in the Developing Countries: Proximate Driving Forces and Preventive Measures," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 19-30.
    2. Zoomers, Annelies & van Noorloos, Femke & Otsuki, Kei & Steel, Griet & van Westen, Guus, 2017. "The Rush for Land in an Urbanizing World: From Land Grabbing Toward Developing Safe, Resilient, and Sustainable Cities and Landscapes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 242-252.
    3. Andrew J Tanentzap & Anthony Lamb & Susan Walker & Andrew Farmer, 2015. "Resolving Conflicts between Agriculture and the Natural Environment," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Jiang, Song & Meng, Jijun & Zhu, Likai, 2020. "Spatial and temporal analyses of potential land use conflict under the constraints of water resources in the middle reaches of the Heihe River," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Garfinkel, Michelle R. & Skaperdas, Stergios, 2007. "Economics of Conflict: An Overview," Handbook of Defense Economics, in: Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler (ed.), Handbook of Defense Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 22, pages 649-709, Elsevier.
    6. Wojewodzic, Tomasz, 2014. "Dezagraryzacja produkcyjno-ekonomiczna gospodarstw rolnych w Polsce – próba pomiaru zjawiska," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 34(4), December.
    7. Meike Fienitz & Rosemarie Siebert, 2021. "Urban versus Rural? Conflict Lines in Land Use Disputes in the Urban–Rural Fringe Region of Schwerin, Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Clarisse Cazals & Jeanne Dachary-Bernard & Marie Lemarié, 2015. "Land Uses and Environmental Conflicts in the Arcachon Bay Coastal Area: An Analysis in Terms of Heritage," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 746-763, April.
    9. Habibullah Magsi & André Torre & Yansui Liu & Muhammad Muhammad Javed Sheikh, 2017. "Land use conflicts in the developing countries: proximate driving forces and preventive measures," Post-Print hal-02619350, HAL.
    10. Kurowska, Krystyna & Kryszk, Hubert & Marks-Bielska, Renata & Mika, Monika & Leń, Przemysław, 2020. "Conversion of agricultural and forest land to other purposes in the context of land protection: Evidence from Polish experience," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    11. Chun-Chang Lee & Yi-Xin Chen & Yun-Ling Wu & Wen-Chih Yeh & Chih-Min Liang, 2020. "Multilevel Analysis of the Pressure of Agricultural Land Conversion, Degree of Urbanization and Agricultural Land Prices in Taiwan," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Qingqing Ye & Rong Wei & Peipei Zhang, 2018. "A Conflict Identification Method of Urban, Agricultural and Ecological Spaces Based on the Space Conversion Matrix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, September.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12867 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Mălina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Azadi, Hossein & Petrescu-Mag, Ioan Valentin, 2018. "Agricultural land use conflict management—Vulnerabilities, law restrictions and negotiation frames. A wake-up call," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 600-610.
    15. Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Dominika & Zawalińska, Katarzyna & Czarnecki, Adam, 2018. "Land-use conflicts and the Common Agricultural Policy: Evidence from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 423-433.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaofei Pang & Binggeng Xie & Rucheng Lu & Xuemao Zhang & Jing Xie & Shaoyin Wei, 2024. "Spatial–Temporal Differentiation and Driving Factors of Cultivated Land Use Transition in Sino–Vietnamese Border Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Guojian Wang & Jianguo Wang & Lingzhi Wang & Yi Zhang & Wenxuan Zhang, 2024. "Land-Use Conflict Dynamics, Patterns, and Drivers under Rapid Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meike Fienitz & Rosemarie Siebert, 2022. "“It Is a Total Drama”: Land Use Conflicts in Local Land Use Actors’ Experience," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Cieślak, Iwona, 2019. "Identification of areas exposed to land use conflict with the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Dominika Milczarek-Andrzejewska & Jerzy Wilkin & Renata Marks-Bielska & Adam Czarnecki & Anna Bartczak, 2020. "Konflikty o ziemię rolną – perspektywa ekonomiczna," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 5-31.
    5. Zilang Cheng & Yanjun Zhang & Lingzhi Wang & Lanyi Wei & Xuying Wu, 2022. "An Analysis of Land-Use Conflict Potential Based on the Perspective of Production–Living–Ecological Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Yanbo, Qu & Shilei, Wang & Yaya, Tian & Guanghui, Jiang & Tao, Zhou & Liang, Meng, 2023. "Territorial spatial planning for regional high-quality development – An analytical framework for the identification, mediation and transmission of potential land utilization conflicts in the Yellow Ri," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Mahsa Mesgar & Diego Ramirez-Lovering & Mohamed El-Sioufi, 2021. "Tension, Conflict, and Negotiability of Land for Infrastructure Retrofit Practices in Informal Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Azadi, Hossein, 2022. "From scythe to smartphone: Rural transformation in Romania evidenced by the perception of rural land and population," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    9. Niu, Hebin & Wang, Jinman & Jing, Zhaorui & Liu, Biao, 2023. "Identification and management of land use conflicts in mining cities: A case study of Shuozhou in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Fazeelat Rehman & Abdullah Khan, 2022. "Environmental Impacts of Urbanization Encroachment in the Lowlands of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Wachter, Magdalena & Wytrzens, Hans Karl, 2022. "Barn or building lot? A cross-case comparison viewing the role of agricultural interests in Austria’s local spatial planning processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Ouellet, F. & Mundler, P. & Dupras, J. & Ruiz, J., 2020. "“Community developed and farmer delivered.” An analysis of the spatial and relational proximities of the Alternative Land Use Services program in Ontario," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Adamson, Jordan, 2020. "Political institutions, resources, and war: Theory and evidence from ancient Rome," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Santiago Sánchez-Pagés, 2007. "Endogenous coalition formation in contests," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 11(2), pages 139-163, September.
    15. Fatema, Naureen, 2019. "Can land title reduce low-intensity interhousehold conflict incidences and associated damages in eastern DRC?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Christien Klaufus & Paul Van Lindert & Femke Van Noorloos & Griet Steel, 2017. "All-Inclusiveness versus Exclusion: Urban Project Development in Latin America and Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Jia, Hao & Skaperdas, Stergios & Vaidya, Samarth, 2013. "Contest functions: Theoretical foundations and issues in estimation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 211-222.
    18. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    19. Timothy Besley & Torsten Persson, 2011. "Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9624.
    20. George Tridimas, 2010. "Constitutional judicial review and political insurance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 81-101, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:128:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723000534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.