IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v120y2022ics0264837722003301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How residential density relates to social interactions? Similarities and differences of moderated mediation models in gated and non-gated communities

Author

Listed:
  • Mousavinia, Seyyedeh Fatemeh

Abstract

Density and community enclosure are the most widely applied policy tools for residential environments. The effectiveness of these policies is often assessed by the social impacts imposed on local communities. A serious gap in the relationship between density and social outcomes is that present literature deals with internal and external density separately and ignores the role of community enclosure in social procedures. Recent studies have declared that to achieve the desired environmental quality, individuals’ perceptions of density should be considered. They have also highlighted that high perceived density predicts low social interactions and territoriality is a well-established mediator of this association. The present paper investigates the similarities and differences of the causal effect between perceived density and social interactions in gated and non-gated communities. A survey was distributed to a sample of 522 habitants residing in six neighborhoods. Presented moderated mediation models suggest that in both types of communities, territoriality mediates the effect of perceived density on social interactions. In non-gated communities residents who perceive a high level of interior crowding may experience the strengthened negative effects of high perceived density on social outcomes. Instead, in gated communities, when perceived interior crowding is high, a higher level of correlation exists between territoriality and social interactions. This finding supports the idea that the residents’ incapability to achieve the desired level of privacy encourages boundary-control behavior in shared spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Mousavinia, Seyyedeh Fatemeh, 2022. "How residential density relates to social interactions? Similarities and differences of moderated mediation models in gated and non-gated communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:120:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003301
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722003301
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burdett, Richard & Travers, Tony & Czischke, Darinka & Rode, Philipp & Moser, Bruno, 2004. "Density and urban neighbourhoods in London: detailed report," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 13970, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Jukka Heinonen & Seppo Junnila, 2014. "The Power of Urban Planning on Environmental Sustainability: A Focus Group Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Aldrin Abdullah & Massoomeh Hedayati Marzbali & Mohammad Javad Maghsoodi Tilaki & Azizi Bahauddin, 2015. "Territorial features, disorder and fear of crime in residential neighbourhoods in Malaysia: testing for multigroup invariance," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 197-218, July.
    4. Christian Iaione, 2016. "The CO-City: Sharing, Collaborating, Cooperating, and Commoning in the City," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 415-455, March.
    5. Seema Dave, 2011. "Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 189-205, May/June.
    6. Tahvonen, Outi & Airaksinen, Miimu, 2018. "Low-density housing in sustainable urban planning – Scaling down to private gardens by using the green infrastructure concept," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 478-485.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vermunt, D.A. & Wojtynia, N. & Hekkert, M.P. & Van Dijk, J. & Verburg, R. & Verweij, P.A. & Wassen, M. & Runhaar, H., 2022. "Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Joanna Borowczyk, 2018. "Sustainable Urban Development: Spatial Analyses as Novel Tools for Planning a Universally Designed City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Steffen Lehmann, 2015. "A New Urban Agenda: Introduction to the Special Issue on “Sustainable Urban Development”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-7, July.
    5. Yunzi Yang & Yuanyuan Ma & Hongzan Jiao, 2021. "Exploring the Correlation between Block Vitality and Block Environment Based on Multisource Big Data: Taking Wuhan City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    6. M. Reza Shirazi & Ramin Keivani & Sue Brownill & Georgia Butina Watson, 2022. "Promoting Social Sustainability of Urban Neighbourhoods: The Case of Bethnal Green, London," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 441-465, May.
    7. Massoomeh Hedayati Marzbali & Aldrin Abdullah & Mohammad Javad Maghsoodi Tilaki & Mina Safizadeh, 2021. "Moving the 2030 Agenda Ahead: Exploring the Role of Multiple Mediators toward Perceived Environment and Social Sustainability in Residential Neighbourhoods," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Omid Mansourihanis & Mohammad Javad Maghsoodi Tilaki & Shiva Sheikhfarshi & Fatemeh Mohseni & Ebrahim Seyedebrahimi, 2024. "Addressing Urban Management Challenges for Sustainable Development: Analyzing the Impact of Neighborhood Deprivation on Crime Distribution in Chicago," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Chisun Yoo & Sugie Lee, 2016. "Neighborhood Built Environments Affecting Social Capital and Social Sustainability in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Giulia Capotorti & Barbara Mollo & Laura Zavattero & Ilaria Anzellotti & Laura Celesti-Grapow, 2015. "Setting Priorities for Urban Forest Planning. A Comprehensive Response to Ecological and Social Needs for the Metropolitan Area of Rome (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Ralitsa Shentova & Sjerp de Vries & Jana Verboom, 2022. "Well-Being in the Time of Corona: Associations of Nearby Greenery with Mental Well-Being during COVID-19 in The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Bowditch, Euan & Santopuoli, Giovanni & Binder, Franz & del Río, Miren & La Porta, Nicola & Kluvankova, Tatiana & Lesinski, Jerzy & Motta, Renzo & Pach, Maciej & Panzacchi, Pietro & Pretzsch, Hans & T, 2020. "What is Climate-Smart Forestry? A definition from a multinational collaborative process focused on mountain regions of Europe," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    13. Kamble, Tanushri & Bahadure, Sarika, 2021. "Investigating application of compact urban form in central Indian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Outi Tahvonen, 2018. "Scalable Green Infrastructure—The Case of Domestic Private Gardens in Vuores, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Beata Stahre Wästberg & Monica Billger & Marco Adelfio, 2020. "A User-Based Look at Visualization Tools for Environmental Data and Suggestions for Improvement—An Inventory among City Planners in Gothenburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Zhen Liu & Zulan Yang & Mohamed Osmani, 2021. "The Relationship between Sustainable Built Environment, Art Therapy and Therapeutic Design in Promoting Health and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Ghosh, Sumita, 2021. "Urban agriculture potential of home gardens in residential land uses: A case study of regional City of Dubbo, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Tanushri Kamble & Sarika Bahadure, 2020. "Neighborhood sustainability assessment in developed and developing countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 4955-4977, August.
    19. Herlin Chien & Keiko Hori & Osamu Saito, 2022. "Urban commons in the techno-economic paradigm shift: An information and communication technology-enabled climate-resilient solutions review," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1389-1405, June.
    20. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Pia Korba & Elina Kalliala & Aino-Kaisa Nuotio, 2018. "GHG Emissions Reduction through Urban Planners’ Improved Control over Earthworks: A Case Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:120:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722003301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.