IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i12p545-d983121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creativity and Social Capital: The Pillars of Venice’s Success in the New European Bauhaus Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Maurizio Busacca

    (Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage, Ca’ Foscari University, Malcanton Marcorà, Dorsoduro 3484/D, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Roberto Paladini

    (Independent Researcher, Vicolo della Pineta 42/F, 30174 Venice, Italy)

Abstract

This article explores six craft-based urban social innovation initiatives implemented in Venice between 2014 and 2021, considered decisive for the candidature of the city in the New European Bauhaus programme. Adopting a qualitative approach based on multiple case study methods, it reconstructs how the promotion of traditional craft enterprises entered the local policy agenda through mechanisms that strengthen the embeddedness of the issue. The article emphasises the polycentrism of social innovation initiatives and highlights the importance of creativity as a tool to trigger co-design processes, of the projects as contexts for knowledge and information sharing, and of events and happenings as contexts for strengthening social capital and increasing its accessibility. In the final part of the paper, some limitations that are emerging and new research lines for the future are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurizio Busacca & Roberto Paladini, 2022. "Creativity and Social Capital: The Pillars of Venice’s Success in the New European Bauhaus Programme," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:545-:d:983121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/12/545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/12/545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Mulgan, 2006. "The Process of Social Innovation," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pages 145-162, April.
    2. Cecilia Manzo & Francesco Ramella, 2015. "Fab Labs in Italy: Collective Goods in the Sharing Economy," Stato e mercato, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 379-418.
    3. Vicky Nowak & Paola Raffaelli, 2022. "The interconnected influences of institutional and social embeddedness on processes of social innovation: A Polanyian perspective," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3-4), pages 319-342, March.
    4. Christian Iaione, 2016. "The CO-City: Sharing, Collaborating, Cooperating, and Commoning in the City," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 415-455, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Tricarico & Edoardo Lorenzetti & Lucio Morettini, 2023. "Crowdsourcing Intangible Heritage for Territorial Development: A Conceptual Framework Considering Italian Inner Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Gianluca Misuraca & Clelia Colombo & Csaba Kucsera & Stephanie Carretero & Margherita Bacigalupo & Raluca Radescu, 2015. "ICT-enabled Social Innovation in support of the Implementation of the Social Investment Package (IESI) - Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation Initiatives promoting Social Investment t," JRC Research Reports JRC97467, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    4. Boeing, Philipp & Wang, Yihan, 2021. "Decoding China's Covid-19 "virus exceptionalism": Community-based digital contact tracing in Wuhan," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-028, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Shr-Wei Kao & Pin Luarn, 2020. "Topic Modeling Analysis of Social Enterprises: Twitter Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    8. Chiara Certomà, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and Urban Space: A Critical Geography Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 8-19.
    9. Szabolcs Nagy & Mariann Veresne Somosi, 2022. "The relationship between social innovation and digital economy and society," Papers 2212.13840, arXiv.org.
    10. Germán Jaraíz Arroyo & Auxiliadora González Portillo, 2020. "Focus on Weaknesses or Strengths? Determining Factors for an Inclusive and Relational Management in Public Community Social Service Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Silvia Stuchi & Sonia Paulino & Faïz Gallouj, 2022. "Social Innovation in Active Mobility Public Services in the Megacity of Sao Paulo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Maribel Guerrero & David Urbano, 2020. "Institutional conditions and social innovations in emerging economies: insights from Mexican enterprises’ initiatives for protecting/preventing the effect of violent events," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 929-957, August.
    13. Ângela Maria Maurer & Tânia Nunes da Silva, 2014. "Analytical Dimensions for Identifying Social Innovations: Evidence from Collective Enterprises," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 11(6), pages 123-145, December.
    14. White, Leroy, 2018. "A Cook's tour: Towards a framework for measuring the social impact of social purpose organisations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 784-797.
    15. Azio Barani, 2015. "Parte quarta: welfare, economia e societ?. Quale innovazione sociale e quale societ? nel ripensare nuovi sistemi di welfare?," QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(103), pages 317-335.
    16. Hugo Pinto & Carla Nogueira & J. André Guerreiro & Fábio Sampaio, 2021. "Social Innovation and the Role of the State: Learning from the Portuguese Experience on Multi-Level Interactions," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Saori Yasumoto & Yasuyuki Gondo, 2021. "CBSI as a Social Innovation to Promote the Health of Older People in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Michael Odei Erdiaw‐Kwasie & Matthew Abunyewah, 2024. "Determinants of social innovation in hybrid organisations: The moderating role of technology readiness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1099-1112, February.
    19. Wendy Phillips & Elizabeth A. Alexander & Hazel Lee, 2019. "Going It Alone Won’t Work! The Relational Imperative for Social Innovation in Social Enterprises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 315-331, May.
    20. Paolo Popoli, 2017. "Corporate Social Innovation in Comparison with Corporate Social Responsibility: Integration, Development or Replacement?," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 148-155, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:545-:d:983121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.