IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v90y2024ics0957178724000985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the effect of increasing block tariffs for residential natural gas in Hefei City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Lanlan
  • Yuan, Xiaomeng
  • Li, Jingjing
  • Li, Ke

Abstract

An increasing block tariff (IBT) policy for residential natural gas has been implemented in all Chinese cities with gas supply since January 2016 to guide residents to reduce gas. Due to the different local climate and demographic characteristics of China's regions, the IBT is not uniform, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the energy-saving effect of IBTs. This paper takes Hefei City as an example, based on a bimonthly bill dataset of Hefei residents from January 2014 to October 2018 and a difference-in-difference (DID) experiment designed within a regression discontinuity design (RDD) framework. The results show that the current IBT has a significant energy-saving effect, especially for households falling within the third price block, but not for households near the price-block thresholds. Further heterogeneity analyses show higher treatment effects for wall-mounted boiler heating users than non-wall-mounted boiler heating users and during the heating season than the non-heating season. These results suggest that the government should optimize the IBT from three to four blocks and develop separate rates for different users and seasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Lanlan & Yuan, Xiaomeng & Li, Jingjing & Li, Ke, 2024. "Assessing the effect of increasing block tariffs for residential natural gas in Hefei City, China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0957178724000985
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2024.101805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724000985
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2024.101805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:90:y:2024:i:c:s0957178724000985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.