IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v78y2022ics0301420722002549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the mining waste as resources in self-compacting concrete: A numerical study on sustainable construction

Author

Listed:
  • Prabhu, R. Srinivas
  • Anuradha, R.
  • Belin Jude, A.

Abstract

To achieve effective resources conservation mechanism and efficient waste management system, recent studies more focused on converting the waste into useful resources in different applications. Construction sector is one of the key sector for development and consumes high quantity of resources, hence, to tackle the high consumption, studies started to introduce waste materials (for ex: fly ash) as replacement of conventional building materials. Such waste material inclusion becomes very popular in concrete applications. However, some of the waste material do have the potential to be a better replacement of conventional concrete materials, which are limited in the existing studies, especially mining waste. This study focused on this gap, by introducing mining waste as potential replacement material in concrete applications, in specific to self-compacting concrete. This step will move forward the existing construction sector towards sustainability by adopting sustainable construction concepts. Despite of these significances, there are very smaller number of studies are reported with the application of mining waste in self compacting concrete. This study focused on this issue by analyzing the existing challenges involved in the inclusion of mining waste in self compacting concrete applications. A numerical modelling has been included in the study to understand and analyze the interrelationship and interdependencies among the collected challenges. With the results of the study, the challenges for sustainable construction through the inclusion of mining waste in self compacting concrete can be eliminated.

Suggested Citation

  • Prabhu, R. Srinivas & Anuradha, R. & Belin Jude, A., 2022. "Understanding the mining waste as resources in self-compacting concrete: A numerical study on sustainable construction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:78:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722002549
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722002549
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani & Qaiser Iqbal & Ahsen Maqsoom & Waqas Farooq, 2021. "Construction Sector Contribution to Economic Stability: Malaysian GDP Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Sulafa Badi & Edward Ochieng & Mohamed Nasaj & Maria Papadaki, 2021. "Technological, organisational and environmental determinants of smart contracts adoption: UK construction sector viewpoint," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 36-54, January.
    3. Serdar Durdyev & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Derek Thurnell & Audrius Banaitis & Ali Ihtiyar, 2018. "Sustainable Construction Industry in Cambodia: Awareness, Drivers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Alzahrani, Ahmed Ibrahim & Al-Samarraie, Hosam & Eldenfria, Atef & Dodoo, Joana Eva & Alalwan, Nasser, 2022. "Users’ intention to continue using mHealth services: A DEMATEL approach during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Lei Zhang & Zhenwei Chu & Huanbin Song, 2019. "Understanding the Relation between BIM Application Behavior and Sustainable Construction: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Serik Tokbolat & Ferhat Karaca & Serdar Durdyev & Rajnish Kaur Calay, 2020. "Construction professionals’ perspectives on drivers and barriers of sustainable construction," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4361-4378, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Güner, Mehmet Oğuz & Kural, Orhan, 2024. "Effects of EU-Compliant mining waste regulation on Turkish mining sector: A review of characterization, classification, storage, management, recovery of mineral wastes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Xiao, Zunlan & Duritan, Mary Josephine M. & Jia, Ruoya, 2024. "Resourceful futures: Integrating responsible mining and green education for sustainable development in developing and emerging economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Cary, Michael & Stephens, Heather M., 2024. "Economic, environmental, and technical gains from the Kyoto Protocol: Evidence from cement manufacturing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Broccardo, Laura & Vola, Paola & Zicari, Adrian & Alshibani, Safiya Mukhtar, 2023. "Contingency-based analysis of the drivers and obstacles to a successful sustainable business model: Seeking the uncaptured value," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Alex Opoku & Zainab Dangana, 2024. "Sustainability assessment frameworks for delivering Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) targets: A case of Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) UK New Const," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3779-3791, September.
    4. Liang Ma & Yun Le & Hongyang Li & Ruoyu Jin & Poorang Piroozfar & Mingqiang Liu, 2018. "Regional Comparisons of Contemporary Construction Industry Sustainable Concepts in the Chinese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Mario Paguay & Juan Diego Febres & Eduardo Valarezo, 2023. "Occupational Accidents in Ecuador: An Approach from the Construction and Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Fauzan Choon bin Abdullah, 2024. "The Impact of Moderation Analysis Between Effective Project Governance and Project Performance Management in Malaysia's Construction Industry ," GATR Journals gjbssr652, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    7. Li, Yongbo & Barrueta Pinto, Mark Christhian & Kumar, D. Thresh, 2023. "Analyzing sustainability indicator for Chinese mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Mari-Isabella Stan, 2021. "Issues concerning the dynamics of labor productivity at the level of the companies in Constanta County operating in the "Construction" sector before and after the COVID-19 pandemic," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 25(1), pages 225-241, November.
    9. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Nasir Hameed & Dhinaharan R & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Mohamed Mubarak Abdul Wahab, 2022. "Efficient Construction Waste Management: A Solution through Industrial Revolution (IR) 4.0 Evaluated by AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Cakraningrat Kencana Murti & Fadhilah Muslim, 2023. "Relationship between Functions, Drivers, Barriers, and Strategies of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Sustainable Construction Criteria: Indonesia Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Laura Treviño-Lozano, 2022. "Framing Social Sustainability in Infrastructure Theory and Practice: A Review of Two Road Projects in Mexico from a Business and Human Rights Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. M. R. Ibrahim & D. U. Muhammad & B. Muhammad & J. O. Alaezi & J. Agidani, 2023. "The Key to Organizational and construction Excellence: A Study of Total Quality Management," Papers 2305.13104, arXiv.org.
    13. Yu Cao & Liyan Huang & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, 2022. "Building Information Modelling (BIM) Capabilities in the Design and Planning of Rural Settlements in China: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    14. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Alishba Sadiq & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Mohamed Mubarak Abdul Wahab, 2022. "A Systematic Review on Enhancement in Quality of Life through Digitalization in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Alvin Baskoro Adhi & Fadhilah Muslim, 2023. "Development of Stakeholder Engagement Strategies to Improve Sustainable Construction Implementation Based on Lean Construction Principles in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Ibukun O. Famakin & Idris Othman & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju & Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Taiwo Matthew Olayemi, 2023. "Building Information Modeling Execution Drivers for Sustainable Building Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Carsten Juergens & Fabian M. Meyer-Heß & Marcus Goebel & Torsten Schmidt, 2021. "Remote Sensing for Short-Term Economic Forecasts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & David John Edwards, 2021. "Modelling the Impact of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation Drivers and Awareness on Project Lifecycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Maria Vasilska, 2021. "Characteristics of Strategic Subcontracting Relations of Industrial SMEs," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, ejes_v7_i.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:78:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722002549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.