IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v90y2021ics0966692320309790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A statistical approach to small area synthetic population generation as a basis for carless evacuation planning

Author

Listed:
  • Nejad, Mohammad Motalleb
  • Erdogan, Sevgi
  • Cirillo, Cinzia

Abstract

Natural or man-made hazards that require evacuation put already vulnerable populations in a more precarious situation. However, when plans and decisions about evacuation are made, the assumption of access to a private car is typically made and differences in income levels across a community is rarely accounted for. The result is that carless members of a community can find themselves stranded. Low income carless residents need alternative transportation means to reach shelters in case of an emergency. Thus, evacuation plans, decisions and models need necessary information that identifies and locates these populations. In this paper, data from the American Community Survey, US Census, Internal Revenue Services and the National Household Travel Survey are used to generate synthetic population for Anne Arundel County, Maryland using the copula concept. Geographic locations of low-income residents are identified within each subarea of the county (census tract) and their car ownership is estimated with a binomial logit model. The developed population synthesis method will allow officials to have a more accurate account of disadvantaged populations for emergency planning and identify locations of shelters, triage points as well as planning carless transportation services.

Suggested Citation

  • Nejad, Mohammad Motalleb & Erdogan, Sevgi & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2021. "A statistical approach to small area synthetic population generation as a basis for carless evacuation planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:90:y:2021:i:c:s0966692320309790
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692320309790
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Thiede & David Brown, 2013. "Hurricane Katrina: Who Stayed and Why?," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(6), pages 803-824, December.
    2. David Pritchard & Eric Miller, 2012. "Advances in population synthesis: fitting many attributes per agent and fitting to household and person margins simultaneously," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 685-704, May.
    3. Liu, Yangwen & Tremblay, Jean-Michel & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2014. "An integrated model for discrete and continuous decisions with application to vehicle ownership, type and usage choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 315-328.
    4. Beckman, Richard J. & Baggerly, Keith A. & McKay, Michael D., 1996. "Creating synthetic baseline populations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 415-429, November.
    5. Chongming Wang & Brent Yarnal, 2012. "The vulnerability of the elderly to hurricane hazards in Sarasota, Florida," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 349-373, September.
    6. Yang Zhou & Ning Li & Wenxiang Wu & Jidong Wu & Peijun Shi, 2014. "Local Spatial and Temporal Factors Influencing Population and Societal Vulnerability to Natural Disasters," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 614-639, April.
    7. Bhat, Chandra R. & Eluru, Naveen, 2009. "A copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 749-765, August.
    8. Stanley Smith & Chris McCarty, 2009. "Fleeing the storm(s): an examination of evacuation behavior during florida’s 2004 hurricane season," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(1), pages 127-145, February.
    9. Susan L. Cutter & Bryan J. Boruff & W. Lynn Shirley, 2003. "Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(2), pages 242-261, June.
    10. Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J. P., 2004. "A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 613-633, August.
    11. Masozera, Michel & Bailey, Melissa & Kerchner, Charles, 2007. "Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: A case study of New Orleans," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 299-306, August.
    12. Genest, Christian & Rémillard, Bruno & Beaudoin, David, 2009. "Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 199-213, April.
    13. Sun, Lijun & Erath, Alexander & Cai, Ming, 2018. "A hierarchical mixture modeling framework for population synthesis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 199-212.
    14. Byungduk Jeong & Wonjoon Lee & Deok-Soo Kim & Hayong Shin, 2016. "Copula-Based Approach to Synthetic Population Generation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Fermanian, Jean-David, 2005. "Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 119-152, July.
    16. Ruijie Bian & Chester G. Wilmot, 2017. "Measuring the vulnerability of disadvantaged populations during hurricane evacuation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 691-707, January.
    17. Dominik Ziemke & Johan W. Joubert & Kai Nagel, 2018. "Accessibility in a Post-Apartheid City: Comparison of Two Approaches for Accessibility Computations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 241-271, June.
    18. Dong, Xiaojing & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E. & Bowman, John L. & Walker, Joan L., 2006. "Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 163-180, February.
    19. Farooq, Bilal & Bierlaire, Michel & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2013. "Simulation based population synthesis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 243-263.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Fournier & Eleni Christofa & Arun Prakash Akkinepally & Carlos Lima Azevedo, 2021. "Integrated population synthesis and workplace assignment using an efficient optimization-based person-household matching method," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 1061-1087, April.
    2. Nicolás C. Bronfman & Paula B. Repetto & Nikole Guerrero & Javiera V. Castañeda & Pamela C. Cisternas, 2021. "Temporal evolution in social vulnerability to natural hazards in Chile," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1757-1784, June.
    3. He, Brian Y. & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2020. "Evaluation of city-scale built environment policies in New York City with an emerging-mobility-accessible synthetic population," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 444-467.
    4. Ma, Lu & Srinivasan, Sivaramakrishnan, 2016. "An empirical assessment of factors affecting the accuracy of target-year synthetic populations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 247-264.
    5. Andrew Bwambale & Charisma F. Choudhury & Stephane Hess & Md. Shahadat Iqbal, 2021. "Getting the best of both worlds: a framework for combining disaggregate travel survey data and aggregate mobile phone data for trip generation modelling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2287-2314, October.
    6. Farooq, Bilal & Bierlaire, Michel & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2013. "Simulation based population synthesis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 243-263.
    7. Sun, Lijun & Erath, Alexander & Cai, Ming, 2018. "A hierarchical mixture modeling framework for population synthesis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 199-212.
    8. Chien-Hao Sung & Shyue-Cherng Liaw, 2021. "Using Spatial Pattern Analysis to Explore the Relationship between Vulnerability and Resilience to Natural Hazards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Saadi, Ismaïl & Mustafa, Ahmed & Teller, Jacques & Farooq, Bilal & Cools, Mario, 2016. "Hidden Markov Model-based population synthesis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-21.
    10. Jelena Kovačević-Majkić & Milena Panić & Dragana Miljanović & Radmila Miletić, 2014. "Vulnerability to natural disasters in Serbia: spatial and temporal comparison," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 72(2), pages 945-968, June.
    11. Jie Huang & Haiming Zhou & Nader Ebrahimi, 2022. "Bayesian Bivariate Cure Rate Models Using Copula Functions," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-9, May.
    12. Wanling Huang & Artem Prokhorov, 2014. "A Goodness-of-fit Test for Copulas," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 751-771, October.
    13. Ozonder, Gozde & Miller, Eric J., 2021. "Longitudinal investigation of skeletal activity episode timing decisions – A copula approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    14. Xun Lu & Kin Lai & Liang Liang, 2014. "Portfolio value-at-risk estimation in energy futures markets with time-varying copula-GARCH model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 333-357, August.
    15. Mohsen Alizadeh & Esmaeil Alizadeh & Sara Asadollahpour Kotenaee & Himan Shahabi & Amin Beiranvand Pour & Mahdi Panahi & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Lee Saro, 2018. "Social Vulnerability Assessment Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Model for Earthquake Hazard in Tabriz City, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Jonathan W. F. Remo & Nicholas Pinter & Moe Mahgoub, 2016. "Assessing Illinois’s flood vulnerability using Hazus-MH," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 265-287, March.
    17. Can, S.U. & Einmahl, John & Laeven, R.J.A., 2020. "Goodness-of-fit testing for copulas: A distribution-free approach," Other publications TiSEM 211b2be9-b46e-41e2-9b95-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Jean-David Fermanian, 2012. "An overview of the goodness-of-fit test problem for copulas," Papers 1211.4416, arXiv.org.
    19. Lu, Xiaohui & Zheng, Xu, 2020. "A goodness-of-fit test for copulas based on martingale transformation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 84-117.
    20. Joseph Karanja & Lawrence M. Kiage, 2022. "Scale implications and evolution of a social vulnerability index in Atlanta, Georgia, USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(1), pages 789-812, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:90:y:2021:i:c:s0966692320309790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.