IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v23y1995i2p221-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision support systems: an extended research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Khoong, C. M.

Abstract

Decision support systems (DSS) have been an active area of research and application for more than 20 years. The role and benefits of DSS are widely recognized today around the world. Drawing from diverse, reported (success and failure) stories of DSS deployment, we develop an agenda for driving DSS research and development (R & D) into the next century. The guiding philosophy in the agenda is the concept of anywhere, anytime, anybody decision making. Three key projects are presented to illustrate the R & D agenda: an integrated framework of decision support tools for manpower and service management; a decision support system for distribution planning; and a decision support model for competitive gaming

Suggested Citation

  • Khoong, C. M., 1995. "Decision support systems: an extended research agenda," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 221-229, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:2:p:221-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(95)00002-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. L. Dietrich, 1991. "A Taxonomy of Discrete Manufacturing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 886-902, December.
    2. Eom, Hyun B. & Lee, Sang M., 1990. "Decision support systems applications research: A bibliography (1971-1988)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 333-342, June.
    3. Howard, Nigel, 1987. "The present and future of metagame analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Igor Mayer & Martin de Jong, 2004. "Combining GDSS and Gaming for Decision Support," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 223-241, May.
    2. T R Willemain & W A Wallace & K R Fleischmann & L B Waisel & S N Ganaway, 2003. "Bad numbers: coping with flawed decision support," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(9), pages 949-957, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bennett, Peter & Howard, Nigel, 1996. "Rationality, emotion and preference change Drama-theoretic models of choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 603-614, August.
    2. Kyoichi Kijima, 2001. "Why Stratification of Networks Emerges in Innovative Society: Intelligent Poly-Agent Systems Approach," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 45-62, June.
    3. Miyaji, Isao & Nakagawa, Yuji & Ohno, Katsuhisa, 1995. "Decision support system for the composition of the examination problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 130-138, January.
    4. Klein, Jonathan H., 2000. "Telling stories: a metagame description of a conflict," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Ismahene Aouadni & Abdelwaheb Rebai, 2017. "Decision support system based on genetic algorithm and multi-criteria satisfaction analysis (MUSA) method for measuring job satisfaction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 3-20, September.
    6. Bryant, J., 1997. "The plot thickens: Understanding interaction through the metaphor of drama," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 255-266, June.
    7. Bennett, Peter, 1998. "Confrontation analysis as a diagnostic tool," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 465-482, September.
    8. Miguel Ramirez de la Huerga & Víctor A. Bañuls Silvera & Murray Turoff & Manuel Rincón Roldan, 2019. "Evaluation Tool for Business Success," Working Papers 19.01, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Business Organization and Marketing (former Department of Business Administration).
    9. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    10. Powell, John & Powell, Philip, 2004. "Scenario networks to align and specify strategic information systems: A case-based study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 146-172, October.
    11. Eom, Sean B., 1998. "Relationships between the decision support system subspecialities and reference disciplines: An empirical investigation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 31-45, January.
    12. Powell, J. H., 2001. "Blackmailing the mayor: Using semi-formal state-based game theory methods to inform a security situation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 330-345, October.
    13. Eom, S. B., 1995. "Decision support systems research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 511-523, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:23:y:1995:i:2:p:221-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.