IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joinma/v22y2008i2p2-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unconscious processing of Web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set

Author

Listed:
  • Yoo, Chan Yun

Abstract

Consumers have become increasingly savvy about technology in recent years, and many of them ignore Web ads during online activities. In this context, measuring advertising effects based on the traditional cognitive models of information processing may undervalue the effectiveness of Web ads. This study experimentally examined the effects of unconscious processing of Web ads by manipulating the level of attention paid to the ad (directed vs. non-directed attention). Online advertisers should be encouraged by the findings of this study. The results suggest that, upon exposure to Web ads, consumers experience priming caused by implicit memory and build a more favorable attitude toward the advertised brand regardless of the levels of attention they paid to the advertisements. Furthermore, those who unconsciously processed Web ads did not remember seeing the ad explicitly, but they were more likely to include the advertised brand in the consideration set than those who had no exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoo, Chan Yun, 2008. "Unconscious processing of Web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 2-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:22:y:2008:i:2:p:2-18
    DOI: 10.1002/dir.20110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996808700070
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/dir.20110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nedungadi, Prakash, 1990. "Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(3), pages 263-276, December.
    2. Janiszewski, Chris, 1990. "The Influence of Print Advertisement Organization on Affect toward a Brand Name," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(1), pages 53-65, June.
    3. Shapiro, Stewart, 1999. "When an Ad's Influence Is Beyond Our Conscious Control: Perceptual and Conceptual Fluency Effects Caused by Incidental Ad Exposure," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 16-36, June.
    4. Janiszewski, Chris, 1993. "Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 376-392, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denter, Philipp, 2020. "Campaign contests," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Rabeb Hamdi* & Romdhane Khemakhem, 2018. "The Effect of E-Communication on the Visit of the Store: An Exploratory Study," Sumerianz Journal of Business Management and Marketing, Sumerianz Publication, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, 04-2018.
    3. Lin Jia & Xin Liu & Yaqian Liu, 2018. "Impact of Different Stakeholders of Bike-Sharing Industry on Users’ Intention of Civilized Use of Bike-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Visentin, Marco & Pizzi, Gabriele & Pichierri, Marco, 2019. "Fake News, Real Problems for Brands: The Impact of Content Truthfulness and Source Credibility on consumers' Behavioral Intentions toward the Advertised Brands," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 99-112.
    5. Winer, Russell S., 2009. "New Communications Approaches in Marketing: Issues and Research Directions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 108-117.
    6. Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon & Baek, Tae Hyun & Sauer, Paul L., 2018. "I See Myself in Service and Product Consumptions: Measuring Self-transformative Consumption Vision (SCV) Evoked by Static and Rich Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 122-139.
    7. Bell, Raoul & Buchner, Axel, 2018. "Positive Effects of Disruptive Advertising on Consumer Preferences," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Imran Anwar Mir, 2017. "Impact of Entertainment Motivational Drivers on User Acceptance of Online Social Network Banner Advertising: A Gratification Perspective," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 20(1), pages 19-47, May.
    9. Landry, Peter, 2022. "Pricing, advertising, and endogenous consideration of an “insistent” product," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wörfel, Philipp, 2021. "Unravelling the intellectual discourse of implicit consumer cognition: A bibliometric review," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4235 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kfir Eliaz & Ran Spiegler, 2011. "Consideration Sets and Competitive Marketing," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 78(1), pages 235-262.
    4. Lizhen Xu & Jason A. Duan & Andrew Whinston, 2014. "Path to Purchase: A Mutually Exciting Point Process Model for Online Advertising and Conversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1392-1412, June.
    5. Hauser, John R., 2014. "Consideration-set heuristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1688-1699.
    6. repec:dgr:rugsom:95b27 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Otterbring, Tobias & Wästlund, Erik & Gustafsson, Anders & Shams, Poja, 2014. "Vision (im)possible? The effects of in-store signage on customers’ visual attention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 676-684.
    8. Gorin, Aleksei & Nedelko, Anastasia & Kosonogov, Vladimir & Vakhviyainen, Maria & Tugin, Sergey & Moiseeva, Victoria & Klucharev, Vasily & Shestakova, Anna, 2022. "N400 correlate of brand associations," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Pieters, Rik G.M. & Rosbergen, Edward & Hartog, Michel, 1995. "Visual attention to advertising : the impact of motivation and repetition," Research Report 95B27, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. D. Vantomme & M. Geuens & J. De Houwer & P. De Pelsmacker, 2004. "Implicit Attitudes Toward Green Consumer Behavior," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/224, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    11. Darvasi, Gábor & Spann, Martin & Zubcsek, Peter Pal, 2024. "How observation of other shoppers increases the in-store use of mobile technology," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Gould, Stephen & Goldsmith, Emily & Lee, Michael, 2020. "The choice polarity effect: An investigation of evolutionary-based trait handedness and perceived magnitudes on laterally displayed choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 627-637.
    13. Lucy F. Ackert & Bryan K. Church & James Tompkins & Ping Zhang, 2005. "What's in a Name? An Experimental Examination of Investment Behavior," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 9(2), pages 281-304.
    14. Marc Vanhuele & Didier Courbet & Sylvain Denis & Frédéric Lavigne & Amélie Borde, 2005. "The Effectiveness of non-focal exposure to web banner ads," Post-Print sic_00078369, HAL.
    15. Mingyu Joo & Kenneth C. Wilbur & Bo Cowgill & Yi Zhu, 2014. "Television Advertising and Online Search," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 56-73, January.
    16. Nordfält, Jens, 2011. "Improving the attention-capturing ability of special displays with the combination effect and the design effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 169-173.
    17. repec:dgr:rugsom:95b28 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Anastasia Nedelko & Olga Lupova & Alexey Gorin & Alexandra Kuznetsova & Vasily Klucharev & Anna Shestakova, 2017. "An Analysis of Brand Association Perception Using N400 Evoked Potential," HSE Working papers WP BRP 77/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    19. Rosbergen, Edward & Pieters, Rik & Wedel, Michel, 1995. "Undirected visual attention to advertising : a segment-level analysis," Research Report 95B28, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Sanktjohanser, Anna & Hörner, Johannes, 2022. "Too Much of A Good Thing?," TSE Working Papers 22-1327, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    21. Kim, Joonkyung & Zhao, Min & Soman, Dilip, 2023. "Converging vs diverging: The effect of visual representation of goal structure on financial decisions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 362-377.
    22. Steenkamp, J-B.E.M. & Nijs, V.R. & Hanssens, D.M. & Dekimpe, M.G., 2002. "Competitive Reactions and the Cross-Sales Effects of Advertising and Promotion," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-20-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    23. Chadwick J. Miller & Daniel C. Brannon & Jim Salas & Martha Troncoza, 2021. "Advertising, incentives, and the upsell: how advertising differentially moderates customer- vs. retailer-directed price incentives’ impact on consumers’ preferences for premium products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1043-1064, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:22:y:2008:i:2:p:2-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-interactive-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.