IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v150y2019icp46-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nostalgia promotes intrinsic motivation and effort in the presence of low interactional justice

Author

Listed:
  • van Dijke, Marius
  • Leunissen, Joost M.
  • Wildschut, Tim
  • Sedikides, Constantine

Abstract

We examined whether nostalgia increases intrinsic motivation in situations of low (vs. high) interactional justice, with downstream implications for work effort. In Study 1, we tested employees of various organizations using experience sampling methodology (ESM). High (vs. low) momentary nostalgia predicted stronger momentary intrinsic motivation, particularly when chronic interactional justice was low (vs. high). In Study 2, another ESM study among employees, we induced nostalgia. Induced nostalgia (vs. control) strengthened momentary work effort, via momentary intrinsic motivation, when chronic interactional justice was low (vs. high). This effect emerged for organizational and personal nostalgia. In Study 3, an experiment, we induced nostalgia and interactional justice. Induced nostalgia (vs. control) increased intrinsic motivation among participants experiencing low (vs. high) interactional justice. This effect of nostalgia was mediated by past-self directedness. In the face of low interactional justice, nostalgia makes employees experience their work as pleasant and motivating, leading them to exert more work effort.

Suggested Citation

  • van Dijke, Marius & Leunissen, Joost M. & Wildschut, Tim & Sedikides, Constantine, 2019. "Nostalgia promotes intrinsic motivation and effort in the presence of low interactional justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 46-61.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:150:y:2019:i:c:p:46-61
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597816307683
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinyue Zhou & Tim Wildschut & Constantine Sedikides & Kan Shi & Cong Feng, 2012. "Nostalgia: The Gift That Keeps on Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 39-50.
    2. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    3. van Dijke, Marius & De Cremer, David & Mayer, David M. & Van Quaquebeke, Niels, 2012. "When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leadership types in relational justice models," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 235-248.
    4. Zapata-Phelan, Cindy P. & Colquitt, Jason A. & Scott, Brent A. & Livingston, Beth, 2009. "Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 93-105, January.
    5. Kristopher J. Preacher & Patrick J. Curran & Daniel J. Bauer, 2006. "Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 31(4), pages 437-448, December.
    6. Fox, Matthew & Tost, Leigh Plunkett & Wade-Benzoni, Kimberly A., 2010. "The Legacy Motive: A Catalyst for Sustainable Decision Making in Organizations," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 153-185, April.
    7. Ambrose, Maureen L. & Seabright, Mark A. & Schminke, Marshall, 2002. "Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 947-965, September.
    8. van Dijke, Marius & Wildschut, Tim & Leunissen, Joost M. & Sedikides, Constantine, 2015. "Nostalgia buffers the negative impact of low procedural justice on cooperation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 15-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pade, Robin & Feurer, Sven, 2022. "The mitigating role of nostalgia for consumer price unfairness perceptions in response to disadvantageous personalized pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 277-287.
    2. Giurge, Laura M. & Woolley, Kaitlin, 2022. "Working during non-standard work time undermines intrinsic motivation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Mohd Ridwan ABD RAZAK & Enah ALI, 2020. "Interdependence Between Interactional Justice And Job Satisfaction," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 26-39, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Dijke, Marius & Wildschut, Tim & Leunissen, Joost M. & Sedikides, Constantine, 2015. "Nostalgia buffers the negative impact of low procedural justice on cooperation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 15-29.
    2. Chan, Sow Hup Joanne & Lai, Ho Yan Isabella, 2017. "Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 214-223.
    3. Kim, Andrea & Moon, Jinhee & Shin, Jiseon, 2019. "Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: A social exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 30-42.
    4. Heli Wang & Ming Jia & Zhe Zhang, 2021. "Good Deeds Done in Silence: Stakeholder Management and Quiet Giving by Chinese Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 649-674, May.
    5. Peter Bußwolder & Swetlana Dregert & Peter Letmathe, 2019. "Consequences of Unfair Job Promotions in Organizations," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 71(1), pages 3-26, February.
    6. Ambrose, Maureen L., 2002. "Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 803-812, September.
    7. Matt ZINGONI, 2022. "Inconsistencies in the Perception of Fairness in the Workplace," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(2), pages 97-118, June.
    8. Leif Brandes & Donja Darai, 2014. "The value of top-down communication for organizational performance," ECON - Working Papers 157, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    9. Sangeeta Sahu & Avinash D. Pathardikar, 2014. "Job Cognition and Justice Influencing Organizational Attachment," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    10. Nayel Al Hawamdeh, 2023. "The Moderating Effect of Professional Commitment on the Relationship between Perceived Organisational Injustice and Knowledge-Hiding Behaviour," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(10), pages 1-41, February.
    11. Grover, Steven L. & Coppins, Amber, 2012. "The intersection of justice and leadership: Testing a moderation model of contingent reward and interpersonal fairness," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 490-498.
    12. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu, 2020. "The Mirage of Procedural Justice and the Primacy of Interactional Justice in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 495-512, December.
    13. Scheuerman, Heather L., 2013. "The relationship between injustice and crime: A general strain theory approach," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 375-385.
    14. Rupp, Deborah E. & Cropanzano, Russell, 2002. "The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 925-946, September.
    15. Ozgur Demirtas, 2015. "Ethical Leadership Influence at Organizations: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 273-284, January.
    16. Yan Liu & Christopher Berry, 2013. "Identity, Moral, and Equity Perspectives on the Relationship Between Experienced Injustice and Time Theft," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 73-83, November.
    17. Brandes, Leif & Darai, Donja, 2017. "The value and motivating mechanism of transparency in organizations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 189-198.
    18. Hongwei He & Weichun Zhu & Xiaoming Zheng, 2014. "Procedural Justice and Employee Engagement: Roles of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity Centrality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(4), pages 681-695, July.
    19. Habib Gul & Zahid Rehman & Muhammad Usman & Sikander Hussain, 2015. "The Effect of Organizational Justice on Employee Turnover Intention with the Mediating role of Emotional Exhaustion in the Banking Sector of Afghanistan," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 272-285.
    20. Mehmet Ferhat Özbek & Mohammad Asif Yoldash & Thomas Li-Ping Tang, 2016. "Theory of Justice, OCB, and Individualism: Kyrgyz Citizens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 365-382, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:150:y:2019:i:c:p:46-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.