IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v20y2010i02p153-185_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Legacy Motive: A Catalyst for Sustainable Decision Making in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Fox, Matthew
  • Tost, Leigh Plunkett
  • Wade-Benzoni, Kimberly A.

Abstract

In this article, we review and build on intergenerational and behavioral ethics research to consider how the motive to build a lasting legacy can impact ethical behavior in intergenerational decision making. We discuss how people can utilize their relationships to organizations to craft their legacies. Further, we elucidate how the legacy motive can enhance business ethics, incorporating theory and empirical findings from research on intergenerational decision making, generativity, and terror management theory to develop the legacy construct and to outline the psychological underpinnings of motivations to leave a positive legacy. We discuss the ways in which legacies can provide a link between life-meaning and pro-social motivation, and we consider the ways in which individuals’ social environments can moderate the intensity of the legacy motive and can impact legacy-building behavior by determining the types of legacies that are valued. Finally, we highlight the implications of these ideas for ethical behavior and sustainable decision making in business contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Fox, Matthew & Tost, Leigh Plunkett & Wade-Benzoni, Kimberly A., 2010. "The Legacy Motive: A Catalyst for Sustainable Decision Making in Organizations," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 153-185, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:20:y:2010:i:02:p:153-185_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00002864/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pankaj Koirala & Raja Rajendra Timilsina & Koji Kotani, 2021. "Deliberative Forms of Democracy and Intergenerational Sustainability Dilemma," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Lumpkin, G.T. & Bacq, Sophie, 2022. "Family business, community embeddedness, and civic wealth creation," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2).
    3. Vanessa Diaz-Moriana & Eric Clinton & Nadine Kammerlander & G. T. Lumpkin & Justin B. Craig, 2020. "Innovation Motives in Family Firms: A Transgenerational View," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(2), pages 256-287, March.
    4. Nathaniel Geiger & Bryan McLaughlin & John Velez, 2021. "Not all boomers: temporal orientation explains inter- and intra-cultural variability in the link between age and climate engagement," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-20, May.
    5. van Dijke, Marius & Leunissen, Joost M. & Wildschut, Tim & Sedikides, Constantine, 2019. "Nostalgia promotes intrinsic motivation and effort in the presence of low interactional justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 46-61.
    6. Jordi Honey-Rosés & Marc Menestrel & Daniel Arenas & Felix Rauschmayer & Julian Rode, 2014. "Enriching Intergenerational Decision-Making with Guided Visualization Exercises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(4), pages 675-680, July.
    7. Giuseppe Danese, 2017. "A social contract approach to sustainability," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 64(4), pages 327-339, December.
    8. McCarter, Matthew W. & Wade-Benzoni, Kimberly A. & Kamal, Darcy K. Fudge & Bang, H. Min & Hyde, Steven J. & Maredia, Reshma, 2020. "Models of intragroup conflict in management: A literature review," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 925-946.
    9. Robert Phillips & Judith Schrempf-Stirling & Christian Stutz, 2020. "The Past, History, and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 203-213, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:20:y:2010:i:02:p:153-185_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.