IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v16y2007i2p185-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group Assessment at Final Degree Level: An Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Gammie
  • Morag Matson

Abstract

There is a growing awareness among educators that it is important to provide a skills-based education as well as one based on academic achievements. This was articulated in the UK by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA, 2000), in its Subject Benchmarking Statement for Accounting (Gloucester: QAAHE). Within the heading 'cognitive abilities and non-subject specific skills', there is a requirement for students to demonstrate abilities and skills in group working (p. 2). In order to capture these key capabilities, curriculum development must focus on utilising appropriate pedagogic techniques, which enhance learning and develop appropriate interpersonal skills. However, universities need to assess these desirable skills otherwise; a 'backwash effect' will stifle innovation. Whilst group assessment has the potential to increase assessment validity, by bringing into the assessment framework skills and competencies, which are more closely related to real-life situations than traditional examinations and essays, appropriate moderation such as peer assessment needs to take place to achieve fairness and objectivity; otherwise the assessment exercise may marginalize reliability. This paper evaluates the introduction of a group assessment project into the final year of an Accounting and Finance degree. Performance data was collected for each student, which facilitated a comparative analysis on both examination and coursework results. Data was also collected from the students by way of questionnaires and a standard module evaluation form. This data provided information on how the groups and the peer assessment operated, together with the students' perceptions of the fairness of the exercise. The paper concludes with recommendations for practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Gammie & Morag Matson, 2007. "Group Assessment at Final Degree Level: An Evaluation," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 185-206.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:185-206
    DOI: 10.1080/09639280701234609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09639280701234609
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639280701234609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evelien Opdecam & Patricia Everaert, 2018. "Seven disagreements about cooperative learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 223-233, May.
    2. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon & John Doran, 2014. "Student Views on Assessment Activities: Perspectives from their Experience on an Undergraduate Programme," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 467-482, October.
    3. Roksana Jahan Tumpa & Samer Skaik & Miriam Ham & Ghulam Chaudhry, 2022. "Authentic Design and Administration of Group-Based Assessments to Improve the Job-Readiness of Project Management Graduates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Margaret Healy & John Doran & Maeve McCutcheon, 2018. "Cooperative learning outcomes from cumulative experiences of group work: differences in student perceptions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 286-308, May.
    5. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.
    6. Ellis, Jennifer Butler & Riley, Mark E. & Shortridge, Rebecca Toppe, 2015. "Incorporating face-to-face peer feedback in a group project setting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 317-331.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:16:y:2007:i:2:p:185-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.