IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v27y2018i3p286-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative learning outcomes from cumulative experiences of group work: differences in student perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Healy
  • John Doran
  • Maeve McCutcheon

Abstract

Studies of cooperative learning have focused largely on specific interventions within individual modules. The aim of this paper is to examine the student perceptions of their cumulative experiences at the end of a four-year undergraduate programme, during which cooperative learning work was implemented in a piecemeal manner, and explore how gender and academic ability impact on those experiences. Data was collected using a survey methodology. Students emphasised the process of cooperative learning, including peer learning and social support, rather than the deliverable outputs of group work. Both male and female students reported difficulties, such as dysfunctional interpersonal relationships and organisational challenges; however, these appear to have had a stronger impact on female students. Academic ability influenced the type of benefit students perceived as gained, with higher academic ability students emphasising social aspects and leadership skills. The results suggest that repeated exposure to cooperative learning had benefits, in terms of social benefits, peer learning and transferable skills, even where the manner of its implementation did not conform to the ideal framework for cooperative learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Healy & John Doran & Maeve McCutcheon, 2018. "Cooperative learning outcomes from cumulative experiences of group work: differences in student perceptions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 286-308, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:27:y:2018:i:3:p:286-308
    DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2018.1476893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2018.1476893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639284.2018.1476893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon & John Doran, 2014. "Student Views on Assessment Activities: Perspectives from their Experience on an Undergraduate Programme," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 467-482, October.
    2. Maria Cadiz Dyball & Anna Reid & Philip Ross & Herbert Schoch, 2007. "Evaluating Assessed Group-work in a Second-year Management Accounting Subject," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 145-162.
    3. Susan Ravenscroft & Frank Buckless & Trevor Hassall, 1999. "Cooperative learning - a literature guide," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 163-176.
    4. Elizabeth Gammie & Morag Matson, 2007. "Group Assessment at Final Degree Level: An Evaluation," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 185-206.
    5. Joan Ballantine & Patricia Mccourt Larres, 2007. "Final Year Accounting Undergraduates' Attitudes to Group Assessment and the Role of Learning Logs," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 163-183.
    6. Margaret Tanner & Tim Lindquist, 1998. "TEACHING RESOURCE Using MONOPOLY TM and Teams-GamesTournaments in accounting education: a cooperative learning teaching resource," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 139-162.
    7. Joan Ballantine & Patricia McCourt Larres, 2009. "Accounting Undergraduates' Perceptions of Cooperative Learning as a Model for Enhancing their Interpersonal and Communication Skills to Interface Successfully with Professional Accountancy Education a," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 387-402.
    8. Sidney Weil & Peter Oyelere & Elizabeth Rainsbury, 2004. "The usefulness of case studies in developing core competencies in a professional accounting programme: a New Zealand study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 139-169.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prerana Agrawal & Jacqueline Birt & Lyndie Bayne & Nikki Schonfeldt, 2022. "The use of case studies in developing students’ understanding of the concept ‘material misstatement’," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1307-1338, April.
    2. Bayne, Lyndie & Birt, Jacqueline & Hancock, Phil & Schonfeldt, Nikki & Agrawal, Prerana, 2022. "Best practices for group assessment tasks," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Eva Blondeel & Patricia Everaert & Evelien Opdecam, 2021. "And Then There Was COVID-19: Do the Benefits of Cooperative Learning Disappear When Switching to Online Education?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Hickey, Anna, 2019. "Accounting education literature review (2018)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evelien Opdecam & Patricia Everaert, 2018. "Seven disagreements about cooperative learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 223-233, May.
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.
    3. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon & John Doran, 2014. "Student Views on Assessment Activities: Perspectives from their Experience on an Undergraduate Programme," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 467-482, October.
    4. Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2010. "Developing skills via work placements in accounting: Student and employer views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 89-108.
    5. Dixon, Keith, 2011. "Assessment at the centre of strategies of [accountant] learning in groups, substantiated with qualitative reflections in student assessments," MPRA Paper 29861, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Roksana Jahan Tumpa & Samer Skaik & Miriam Ham & Ghulam Chaudhry, 2022. "Authentic Design and Administration of Group-Based Assessments to Improve the Job-Readiness of Project Management Graduates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Tan, Hwee Cheng, 2019. "Using a structured collaborative learning approach in a case-based management accounting course," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    8. E. Opdecam & P. Everaert, 2011. "Improving student satisfaction and time spent by team learning in accounting education," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 11/759, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    9. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon, 2010. "Teaching with Case Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Accounting Lecturers' Experiences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 555-567.
    10. Cipriano, Michael & Hamilton, Erin L. & Vandervelde, Scott D., 2016. "Newport Soup Inc.: An interactive inherent risk assessment case," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 13-23.
    11. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2015. "Accounting education literature review (2013–2014)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 69-127.
    12. Fordham, David R., 2012. "Applying a real-world fraud to multiple learning objectives: Considerations and an example from the systems course," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 325-354.
    13. Delgado Hurtado, María del Mar & Castrillo Lara, Luis Ángel, 2015. "Efectividad del aprendizaje cooperativo en contabilidad: una contrastación empírica," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 138-147.
    14. Ellis, Jennifer Butler & Riley, Mark E. & Shortridge, Rebecca Toppe, 2015. "Incorporating face-to-face peer feedback in a group project setting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 317-331.
    15. Bruce Morley, 2016. "Teaching empirical finance courses: A project on portfolio management," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1167157-116, December.
    16. Gowri Shankar, Premila & Seow, Jean Lin, 2010. "The association between accounting students’ lone wolf tendencies and their perceptions, preferences and performance outcomes in team projects," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 75-84.
    17. Jean Lin Seow & Premila Gowri Shankar, 2018. "Effects of team-skills guidance on accounting students with lone wolf tendencies," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 309-332, May.
    18. Sidney Weil & Peter Oyelere & Elizabeth Rainsbury, 2004. "The usefulness of case studies in developing core competencies in a professional accounting programme: a New Zealand study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 139-169.
    19. Chiang, Christina & Wells, Paul K. & Xu, Gina, 2021. "How does experiential learning encourage active learning in auditing education?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Maria Cadiz Dyball & Anna Reid & Philip Ross & Herbert Schoch, 2010. "Compulsory group work – accounting students' conceptions and suggestions," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 92-105, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:27:y:2018:i:3:p:286-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.