IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v98y2007i3p481-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More on the inadmissibility of step-up

Author

Listed:
  • Cohen, Arthur
  • Sackrowitz, Harold B.

Abstract

Cohen and Sackrowitz [Characterization of Bayes procedures for multiple endpoint problems and inadmissibility of the step-up procedure, Ann. Statist. 33 (2005) 145-158] proved that the step-up multiple testing procedure is inadmissible for a multivariate normal model with unknown mean vector and known intraclass covariance matrix. The hypotheses tested are each mean is zero vs. each mean is positive. The risk function is a 2x1 vector where one component is average size and the other component is one minus average power. In this paper, we extend the inadmissibility result to several different models, to two-sided alternatives, and to other risk functions. The models include one-parameter exponential families, independent t-variables, independent [chi]2-variables, t-tests arising from the analysis of variance, and t-tests arising from testing treatments against a control. The additional risk functions are linear combinations where one component is the false discovery rate (FDR).

Suggested Citation

  • Cohen, Arthur & Sackrowitz, Harold B., 2007. "More on the inadmissibility of step-up," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 481-492, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:98:y:2007:i:3:p:481-492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-259X(06)00020-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ishwaran H. & Rao J.S., 2003. "Detecting Differentially Expressed Genes in Microarrays Using Bayesian Model Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 438-455, January.
    2. Peter Muller & Giovanni Parmigiani & Christian Robert & Judith Rousseau, 2004. "Optimal Sample Size for Multiple Testing: The Case of Gene Expression Microarrays," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 990-1001, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Youngjo Lee & Jan F. Bjørnstad, 2013. "Extended likelihood approach to large-scale multiple testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 553-575, June.
    2. Ebrahimi, Nader, 2008. "Simultaneous control of false positives and false negatives in multiple hypotheses testing," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 437-450, March.
    3. Gordon, Alexander Y., 2014. "Smoothing of stepwise multiple testing procedures," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 149-157.
    4. Michele Guindani & Peter Müller & Song Zhang, 2009. "A Bayesian discovery procedure," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 905-925, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghosh Debashis, 2012. "Incorporating the Empirical Null Hypothesis into the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Gómez-Villegas Miguel A. & Salazar Isabel & Sanz Luis, 2014. "A Bayesian decision procedure for testing multiple hypotheses in DNA microarray experiments," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 49-65, February.
    3. HyungJun Cho & Jaewoo Kang & Jae Lee, 2009. "Empirical Bayes analysis of unreplicated microarray data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 393-408, August.
    4. Zichen Ma & Shannon W. Davis & Yen‐Yi Ho, 2023. "Flexible copula model for integrating correlated multi‐omics data from single‐cell experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1559-1572, June.
    5. Koop, Gary & Korobilis, Dimitris, 2016. "Model uncertainty in Panel Vector Autoregressive models," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 115-131.
    6. Dazard, Jean-Eudes & Sunil Rao, J., 2012. "Joint adaptive mean–variance regularization and variance stabilization of high dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2317-2333.
    7. Ishwaran, Hemant & Sunil Rao, J., 2008. "Clustering gene expression profile data by selective shrinkage," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(12), pages 1490-1497, September.
    8. Michele Guindani & Wesley O. Johnson, 2018. "More nonparametric Bayesian inference in applications," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(2), pages 239-251, June.
    9. Elisa C. J. Maria & Isabel Salazar & Luis Sanz & Miguel A. Gómez-Villegas, 2020. "Using Copula to Model Dependence When Testing Multiple Hypotheses in DNA Microarray Experiments: A Bayesian Approximation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Zhaoyang Tian & Kun Liang & Pengfei Li, 2021. "A powerful procedure that controls the false discovery rate with directional information," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 212-222, March.
    11. Wagner, Helga & Duller, Christine, 2012. "Bayesian model selection for logistic regression models with random intercept," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1256-1274.
    12. Bickel David R., 2008. "Correcting the Estimated Level of Differential Expression for Gene Selection Bias: Application to a Microarray Study," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Willi Maurer & Frank Bretz & Xiaolei Xun, 2023. "Optimal test procedures for multiple hypotheses controlling the familywise expected loss," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2781-2793, December.
    14. Edsel Peña & Joshua Habiger & Wensong Wu, 2015. "Classes of multiple decision functions strongly controlling FWER and FDR," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(5), pages 563-595, July.
    15. Xiaoquan Wen, 2017. "Robust Bayesian FDR Control Using Bayes Factors, with Applications to Multi-tissue eQTL Discovery," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(1), pages 28-49, June.
    16. Noirrit Kiran Chandra & Sourabh Bhattacharya, 2021. "Asymptotic theory of dependent Bayesian multiple testing procedures under possible model misspecification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(5), pages 891-920, October.
    17. Bansal Naveen K., 2007. "Decision theoretic Bayesian hypothesis testing with the selection goal," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1), pages 19-39, January.
    18. Ishwaran, Hemant & Sunil Rao, J., 2011. "Consistency of spike and slab regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(12), pages 1920-1928.
    19. Sudipto Banerjee, 2023. "Discussion of “Optimal test procedures for multiple hypotheses controlling the familywise expected loss” by Willi Maurer, Frank Bretz, and Xiaolei Xun," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2798-2801, December.
    20. Montazeri Zahra & Yanofsky Corey M. & Bickel David R., 2010. "Shrinkage Estimation of Effect Sizes as an Alternative to Hypothesis Testing Followed by Estimation in High-Dimensional Biology: Applications to Differential Gene Expression," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-33, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:98:y:2007:i:3:p:481-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.