IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bes/jnlasa/v99y2004p990-1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Sample Size for Multiple Testing: The Case of Gene Expression Microarrays

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Muller
  • Giovanni Parmigiani
  • Christian Robert
  • Judith Rousseau

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Muller & Giovanni Parmigiani & Christian Robert & Judith Rousseau, 2004. "Optimal Sample Size for Multiple Testing: The Case of Gene Expression Microarrays," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 990-1001, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bes:jnlasa:v:99:y:2004:p:990-1001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asa/jasa/2004/00000099/00000468/art00012
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rossell David & Guerra Rudy & Scott Clayton, 2008. "Semi-Parametric Differential Expression Analysis via Partial Mixture Estimation," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Sudipto Banerjee, 2023. "Discussion of “Optimal test procedures for multiple hypotheses controlling the familywise expected loss” by Willi Maurer, Frank Bretz, and Xiaolei Xun," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2798-2801, December.
    3. Cohen, Arthur & Sackrowitz, Harold B., 2007. "More on the inadmissibility of step-up," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 481-492, March.
    4. Zhaoyang Tian & Kun Liang & Pengfei Li, 2021. "A powerful procedure that controls the false discovery rate with directional information," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 212-222, March.
    5. Jack Jewson & Li Li & Laura Battaglia & Stephen Hansen & David Rossell & Piotr Zwiernik, 2022. "Graphical model inference with external network data," CeMMAP working papers 20/22, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Wang, Xia & Shojaie, Ali & Zou, Jian, 2019. "Bayesian hidden Markov models for dependent large-scale multiple testing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 123-136.
    7. Edsel Peña & Joshua Habiger & Wensong Wu, 2015. "Classes of multiple decision functions strongly controlling FWER and FDR," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(5), pages 563-595, July.
    8. Dickhaus Thorsten, 2015. "Simultaneous Bayesian analysis of contingency tables in genetic association studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(4), pages 347-360, August.
    9. David Lähnemann & Johannes Köster & Ute Fischer & Arndt Borkhardt & Alice C. McHardy & Alexander Schönhuth, 2021. "Accurate and scalable variant calling from single cell DNA sequencing data with ProSolo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Willi Maurer & Frank Bretz & Xiaolei Xun, 2023. "Optimal test procedures for multiple hypotheses controlling the familywise expected loss," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2781-2793, December.
    11. Michele Guindani & Wesley O. Johnson, 2018. "More nonparametric Bayesian inference in applications," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 27(2), pages 239-251, June.
    12. Cheng‐Han Yu & Raquel Prado & Hernando Ombao & Daniel Rowe, 2023. "Bayesian spatiotemporal modeling on complex‐valued fMRI signals via kernel convolutions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 616-628, June.
    13. Ghosh Debashis, 2012. "Incorporating the Empirical Null Hypothesis into the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Xiaoquan Wen, 2017. "Robust Bayesian FDR Control Using Bayes Factors, with Applications to Multi-tissue eQTL Discovery," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(1), pages 28-49, June.
    15. Zichen Ma & Shannon W. Davis & Yen‐Yi Ho, 2023. "Flexible copula model for integrating correlated multi‐omics data from single‐cell experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1559-1572, June.
    16. Willi Maurer & Frank Bretz & Xiaolei Xun, 2023. "Rejoinder to discussions on “Optimal test procedures for multiple hypotheses controlling the familywise expected loss”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 2811-2814, December.
    17. Elisa C. J. Maria & Isabel Salazar & Luis Sanz & Miguel A. Gómez-Villegas, 2020. "Using Copula to Model Dependence When Testing Multiple Hypotheses in DNA Microarray Experiments: A Bayesian Approximation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Bickel David R., 2008. "Correcting the Estimated Level of Differential Expression for Gene Selection Bias: Application to a Microarray Study," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, March.
    19. Noirrit Kiran Chandra & Sourabh Bhattacharya, 2021. "Asymptotic theory of dependent Bayesian multiple testing procedures under possible model misspecification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(5), pages 891-920, October.
    20. Gómez-Villegas Miguel A. & Salazar Isabel & Sanz Luis, 2014. "A Bayesian decision procedure for testing multiple hypotheses in DNA microarray experiments," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 49-65, February.
    21. Kiranmoy Das, 2016. "A semiparametric Bayesian approach for joint modeling of longitudinal trait and event time," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(15), pages 2850-2865, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bes:jnlasa:v:99:y:2004:p:990-1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jasa/index.cfm?fuseaction=main .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.