IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v29y2003i4p551-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Bloch, Peter H
  • Brunel, Frederic F
  • Arnold, Todd J

Abstract

This research conceptualizes and develops a scale to measure individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics (CVPA), defined as the level of significance that visual aesthetics hold for a particular consumer in his/her relationship with products. Three related dimensions of product aesthetics centrality emerged from the research: value, acumen, and response intensity. A series of eight studies provided evidence that the CVPA measure possesses satisfactory reliability and validity. Additionally, this research illuminates important differences between high and low CVPA consumers in product-design-related evaluations and behaviors and provides suggestions for future research employing the scale. Copyright 2003 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Bloch, Peter H & Brunel, Frederic F & Arnold, Todd J, 2003. "Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 551-565, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:29:y:2003:i:4:p:551-65
    DOI: 10.1086/346250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/346250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/346250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:29:y:2003:i:4:p:551-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.