IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v61y2008i6p684-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability of global brands to negative feedback effects

Author

Listed:
  • Milberg, Sandra J.
  • Sinn, Francisca

Abstract

Going global is a successful strategy to leverage a brand's equity, in part, because global is synonymous of quality for consumers. This research examines the impact of competitor brand familiarity on the quality perceptions of global brands in Chile when the brand extends into new product categories. The results indicate that there is a negative impact on the quality perceptions of brand extensions when an extension competes with well-known and well-liked competitor brands. However, brand extension quality beliefs seem to produce negative feedback effects on parent brand quality beliefs only for narrowly extended parent brands but not for broadly extended ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Milberg, Sandra J. & Sinn, Francisca, 2008. "Vulnerability of global brands to negative feedback effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 684-690, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:61:y:2008:i:6:p:684-690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(07)00244-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barone, Michael J & Miniard, Paul W & Romeo, Jean B, 2000. "The Influence of Positive Mood on Brand Extension Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 386-400, March.
    2. Sheinin, Daniel A. & Schmitt, Bernd H., 1994. "Extending brands with new product concepts: The role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-10, September.
    3. Zhang, Shi & Sood, Sanjay, 2002. ""Deep" and "Surface" Cues: Brand Extension Evaluations by Children and Adults," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 129-141, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massoud Moslehpour & Ka Yin Chau & Alaleh Dadvari & Ben-Roy Do & Victoria Seitz, 2019. "What Killed HTC and Kept Apple Alive? Brand Sustainability Comparison of Two Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Massoud Moslehpour & Sahand E. P. Faez & Brij B. Gupta & Varsha Arya, 2023. "A Fuzzy-Based Analysis of the Mediating Factors Affecting Sustainable Purchase Intentions of Smartphones: The Case of Two Brands in Two Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Farías, Pablo, 2015. "Determinantes do sucesso de marcas globais e locais na América Latina," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 55(5), September.
    4. Adedayo Akeem Musari & Mofoluwake Folasayo Ayo, 2019. "Product Branding on the Effectiveness and Performance of Manufacturing Industry," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 181-198, December.
    5. Celedon, Paulina & Milberg, Sandra & Sinn, Francisca, 2013. "Attraction and superiority effects in the Chilean marketplace: Do they exist with real brands?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1780-1786.
    6. Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2010. "Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1237-1244, November.
    7. Rajesh Sharma, 2017. "Building Customer-based Brand Equity of Domestic Brands: Role of Brand Equity Dimensions," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 16(1), pages 45-59, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Lane Keller, 2016. "Reflections on customer-based brand equity: perspectives, progress, and priorities," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Martínez, Eva & Montaner, Teresa & Pina, José M., 2009. "Brand extension feedback: The role of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 305-313, March.
    3. Franziska Völckner & Henrik Sattler, 2005. "Markentransfererfolgsanalysen bei kurzlebigen Konsumgütern unter Berücksichtigung von Konsumentenheterogenität," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 57(8), pages 669-688, December.
    4. Miha Dominko & Miroslav Verbič, 2022. "The effect of subjective well‐being on consumption behavior," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 876-898, June.
    5. Drichoutis, Andreas & Nayga, Rodolfo & Klonaris, Stathis, 2010. "The Effects of Induced Mood on Preference Reversals and Bidding Behavior in Experimental Auction Valuation," MPRA Paper 25597, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Özge Sýðýrcý & A. Müge Yalçýn, 2010. "Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations Of Brand Extensions," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 67-90.
    7. Gordon Liu & Wai Wai Ko, 2014. "An integrated model of cause-related marketing strategy development," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 4(3), pages 78-95, December.
    8. Tarunija Chandra & Vibhuti Tripathi, 2023. "Antecedents and Mediators for Building and Integrated Research Framework towards Successful Brand Revitalisation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 133-163.
    9. Kim, Kyeongheui & Park, Jongwon, 2019. "Cultural influences on brand extension judgments: Opposing effects of thinking style and regulatory focus," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 137-150.
    10. David Hirshleifer, 2001. "Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1533-1597, August.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4202 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Marco Giarratana & Alessandra Perri, 2014. "Product and Marketing Actions in a Competitive Scenario," Working Papers 30, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    13. Gierl, Heribert & Huettl, Verena, 2011. "A closer look at similarity: The effects of perceived similarity and conjunctive cues on brand extension evaluation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 120-133.
    14. Esra Arikan & Cengiz Yilmaz & Muzaffer Bodur, 2016. "Expanding the boundary of brand extensions through brand relationship quality," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 930-944, November.
    15. Jeffrey Radighieri & Babu John Mariadoss & Yany Grégoire & Jean Johnson, 2014. "Ingredient branding and feedback effects: The impact of product outcomes, initial parent brand strength asymmetry, and parent brand role," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 123-138, June.
    16. Beichen Liang & Wei Fu, 2021. "The choice of brand extension: the moderating role of brand loyalty on fit and brand familiarity," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 17-32, March.
    17. Nathalie Fleck-Dousteyssier & Elyette Roux & Denis Darpy, 2006. "La congruence dans le parrainage : définition, rôle et mesure," Post-Print hal-01518919, HAL.
    18. Richard Klink, 2009. "Gender differences in new brand name response," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 313-326, September.
    19. Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2013. "Eliciting risk and time preferences under induced mood states," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 18-27.
    20. Kim, Chung K. & Lavack, Anne M. & Smith, Margo, 2001. "Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 211-222, June.
    21. Pourazad, Naser & Stocchi, Lara & Pare, Vipul, 2019. "Brand attribute associations, emotional consumer-brand relationship and evaluation of brand extensions," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 249-260.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:61:y:2008:i:6:p:684-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.